Cargando…

Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of workplace health promotion programs: Employers' perceptions

BACKGROUND: Workplace health promotion programs (WHPPs) can benefit the lifestyle and health of employees. However, not all WHPPs have been successful in their implementation, and thus their effectiveness. This study aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators to implementing an integrated WHPP,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Campmans, Jennifer M. D., Smit, Denise J. M., van Oostrom, Sandra H., Engels, Josephine A., Proper, Karin I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9879575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36711336
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1035064
_version_ 1784878721921974272
author Campmans, Jennifer M. D.
Smit, Denise J. M.
van Oostrom, Sandra H.
Engels, Josephine A.
Proper, Karin I.
author_facet Campmans, Jennifer M. D.
Smit, Denise J. M.
van Oostrom, Sandra H.
Engels, Josephine A.
Proper, Karin I.
author_sort Campmans, Jennifer M. D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Workplace health promotion programs (WHPPs) can benefit the lifestyle and health of employees. However, not all WHPPs have been successful in their implementation, and thus their effectiveness. This study aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators to implementing an integrated WHPP, which targets multiple lifestyle factors at different levels (individual and organizational), from an employer's perspective. METHODS: Data were collected by two online focus groups among 18 representatives of eight different organizations. Data from the focus group discussions were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis. Data were coded both inductively and deductively, using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) consisting of the following five domains: (1) intervention characteristics, (2) outer setting, (3) inner setting, (4) characteristics of individuals, and (5) process. Ratings were performed to indicate the positive or negative influence and strength of a construct regarding the implementation of WHPPs. RESULTS: Barriers and facilitators in all domains of the CFIR were found. Regarding characteristics of the WHPP, complexity and costs hindered implementation, while high adaptability facilitated it. An organization that met the needs of employees (the outer setting) facilitated implementation. Available resources, access to knowledge, leadership involvement, and continuity of communication were facilitators within the inner setting. Barriers were different approaches to implementation within one organization and the perceived interference with employees' lives. For the implementation process, the involvement of key stakeholders, including employees, was identified as an important facilitator. CONCLUSION: Various barriers and facilitators in different domains play a role in the implementation of integrated WHPPs, according to employers. Strategies that tackle the identified barriers and incorporate the facilitators will likely contribute to the successful implementation of integrated WHPPs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9879575
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98795752023-01-27 Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of workplace health promotion programs: Employers' perceptions Campmans, Jennifer M. D. Smit, Denise J. M. van Oostrom, Sandra H. Engels, Josephine A. Proper, Karin I. Front Public Health Public Health BACKGROUND: Workplace health promotion programs (WHPPs) can benefit the lifestyle and health of employees. However, not all WHPPs have been successful in their implementation, and thus their effectiveness. This study aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators to implementing an integrated WHPP, which targets multiple lifestyle factors at different levels (individual and organizational), from an employer's perspective. METHODS: Data were collected by two online focus groups among 18 representatives of eight different organizations. Data from the focus group discussions were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis. Data were coded both inductively and deductively, using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) consisting of the following five domains: (1) intervention characteristics, (2) outer setting, (3) inner setting, (4) characteristics of individuals, and (5) process. Ratings were performed to indicate the positive or negative influence and strength of a construct regarding the implementation of WHPPs. RESULTS: Barriers and facilitators in all domains of the CFIR were found. Regarding characteristics of the WHPP, complexity and costs hindered implementation, while high adaptability facilitated it. An organization that met the needs of employees (the outer setting) facilitated implementation. Available resources, access to knowledge, leadership involvement, and continuity of communication were facilitators within the inner setting. Barriers were different approaches to implementation within one organization and the perceived interference with employees' lives. For the implementation process, the involvement of key stakeholders, including employees, was identified as an important facilitator. CONCLUSION: Various barriers and facilitators in different domains play a role in the implementation of integrated WHPPs, according to employers. Strategies that tackle the identified barriers and incorporate the facilitators will likely contribute to the successful implementation of integrated WHPPs. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9879575/ /pubmed/36711336 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1035064 Text en Copyright © 2023 Campmans, Smit, van Oostrom, Engels and Proper. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Campmans, Jennifer M. D.
Smit, Denise J. M.
van Oostrom, Sandra H.
Engels, Josephine A.
Proper, Karin I.
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of workplace health promotion programs: Employers' perceptions
title Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of workplace health promotion programs: Employers' perceptions
title_full Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of workplace health promotion programs: Employers' perceptions
title_fullStr Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of workplace health promotion programs: Employers' perceptions
title_full_unstemmed Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of workplace health promotion programs: Employers' perceptions
title_short Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of workplace health promotion programs: Employers' perceptions
title_sort barriers and facilitators to the implementation of workplace health promotion programs: employers' perceptions
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9879575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36711336
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1035064
work_keys_str_mv AT campmansjennifermd barriersandfacilitatorstotheimplementationofworkplacehealthpromotionprogramsemployersperceptions
AT smitdenisejm barriersandfacilitatorstotheimplementationofworkplacehealthpromotionprogramsemployersperceptions
AT vanoostromsandrah barriersandfacilitatorstotheimplementationofworkplacehealthpromotionprogramsemployersperceptions
AT engelsjosephinea barriersandfacilitatorstotheimplementationofworkplacehealthpromotionprogramsemployersperceptions
AT properkarini barriersandfacilitatorstotheimplementationofworkplacehealthpromotionprogramsemployersperceptions