A Comparative Study of Left Atrial Function Index of Hypertensive Heart Failure Patients Versus Controls in a Teaching Hospital, Sub-Saharan Africa

Background and aim: The left atrium contributes significantly to the left ventricular filling as it functions as a reservoir, conduit, and pump. These functions are referred to as the phasic function of the left atrium and they are assessed using left atrial volumes. The left atrial function index on the other hand is a rhythmic independent composite index which is a better marker of left atrial function. The study therefore aimed at comparing left atrial function (using the left atrial function index) among hypertensive heart failure patients, patients with hypertension but not in heart failure, and normotensive patients. Method: The study was a cross-sectional analytical study that was carried out at Delta State University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria. A total of 80 hypertensive heart failure patients, 80 hypertensive, and 40 normotensive patients who met the inclusion criteria were recruited from the cardiology clinics using the convenience sampling method. The left atrial function index was determined using the volumetric method. Significance was assessed at p < 0.05. Result: The left atrial function index (21.13 ± 8.83 versus 42.28 ± 10.40 versus 50.47 ± 14.37, p = 0.001) of the hypertensive heart failure group was significantly lowest when compared with the hypertensive (p < 0.001) and normotensive (p < 0.001) groups. Although the left atrial function index of the hypertensive group (42.28 ± 10.40) was lower than the normotensive group (50.47 ± 14.37), it was however not found to be significant (p = 0.12). Also, the left atrial function index was significantly (p = 0.001) worse among the patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (13.5 ± 5.94) compared to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (40.81 ± 12.12). Conclusion: Left atrial function index was lowest among hypertensive heart failure patients compared with hypertensive and normotensive cohorts, and it was worse among heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients. However, there was no significant difference between the left atrial function index of the hypertensive and normotensive groups. As a result, we recommend that the left atrial function index should be incorporated into the routine echocardiographic assessment of patients in our day-to-day clinical practice and large studies should be carried out to determine the cut-off value for the left atrial function.