Cargando…

Sessile serrated lesion detection rates continue to increase: 2008–2020

Background and study aims  We assessed sessile serrated lesion detection rate (SSLDR) at a large academic medical center from 2008 to 2020 and modeled a local, aspirational target SSLDR. We also assessed SSLDRs among all gastroenterology fellows to better understand the relationship between SSLDRs a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Edwardson, Nicholas, Adsul, Prajakta, Gonzalez, Zorisadday, Pankratz, V. Shane, Parasher, Gulshan, English, Kevin, Mishra, Shiraz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9879655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36712908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1990-0509
_version_ 1784878739475136512
author Edwardson, Nicholas
Adsul, Prajakta
Gonzalez, Zorisadday
Pankratz, V. Shane
Parasher, Gulshan
English, Kevin
Mishra, Shiraz
author_facet Edwardson, Nicholas
Adsul, Prajakta
Gonzalez, Zorisadday
Pankratz, V. Shane
Parasher, Gulshan
English, Kevin
Mishra, Shiraz
author_sort Edwardson, Nicholas
collection PubMed
description Background and study aims  We assessed sessile serrated lesion detection rate (SSLDR) at a large academic medical center from 2008 to 2020 and modeled a local, aspirational target SSLDR. We also assessed SSLDRs among all gastroenterology fellows to better understand the relationship between SSLDRs and total colonoscopies performed. Patients and methods  SSL-positive pathology results were flagged from a dataset composed of all screening colonoscopies for average-risk patients from 2008 to 2020. Unadjusted SSLDRs were calculated for individual endoscopists by year. A mixed effects logistic regression was used to estimate the log odds of SSL detection, with one model estimating division-wide predictors of SSL detection and a second model focused exclusively on colonoscopies performed by fellows. Model-adjusted SSLDRs were estimated for all 13 years and across both categories of all endoscopists and fellows only. Results  Adjusted SSLDRs showed a consistent improvement in SSLDR from a low of 0.37 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.10–0.63) in 2008 to a high of 7.94 % (95 % CI: 6.34–9.54) in 2020. Among fellows only, the odds of SSL detection were significantly lower during their first year compared to their second year (OR: 0.80, 95 % CI: 0.66–0.98) but not significantly higher in their third year compared to their second year (OR: 1.09, 95 % CI: 0.85–1.4). Conclusions  SSLDR increased steadily and significantly throughout our study period but variance among endoscopists persists. The peak SSLDR from 2020 of 7.94 % should serve as the local aspirational target for this division’s attendings and fellows but should be continuously reevaluated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9879655
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98796552023-01-27 Sessile serrated lesion detection rates continue to increase: 2008–2020 Edwardson, Nicholas Adsul, Prajakta Gonzalez, Zorisadday Pankratz, V. Shane Parasher, Gulshan English, Kevin Mishra, Shiraz Endosc Int Open Background and study aims  We assessed sessile serrated lesion detection rate (SSLDR) at a large academic medical center from 2008 to 2020 and modeled a local, aspirational target SSLDR. We also assessed SSLDRs among all gastroenterology fellows to better understand the relationship between SSLDRs and total colonoscopies performed. Patients and methods  SSL-positive pathology results were flagged from a dataset composed of all screening colonoscopies for average-risk patients from 2008 to 2020. Unadjusted SSLDRs were calculated for individual endoscopists by year. A mixed effects logistic regression was used to estimate the log odds of SSL detection, with one model estimating division-wide predictors of SSL detection and a second model focused exclusively on colonoscopies performed by fellows. Model-adjusted SSLDRs were estimated for all 13 years and across both categories of all endoscopists and fellows only. Results  Adjusted SSLDRs showed a consistent improvement in SSLDR from a low of 0.37 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.10–0.63) in 2008 to a high of 7.94 % (95 % CI: 6.34–9.54) in 2020. Among fellows only, the odds of SSL detection were significantly lower during their first year compared to their second year (OR: 0.80, 95 % CI: 0.66–0.98) but not significantly higher in their third year compared to their second year (OR: 1.09, 95 % CI: 0.85–1.4). Conclusions  SSLDR increased steadily and significantly throughout our study period but variance among endoscopists persists. The peak SSLDR from 2020 of 7.94 % should serve as the local aspirational target for this division’s attendings and fellows but should be continuously reevaluated. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2023-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9879655/ /pubmed/36712908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1990-0509 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Edwardson, Nicholas
Adsul, Prajakta
Gonzalez, Zorisadday
Pankratz, V. Shane
Parasher, Gulshan
English, Kevin
Mishra, Shiraz
Sessile serrated lesion detection rates continue to increase: 2008–2020
title Sessile serrated lesion detection rates continue to increase: 2008–2020
title_full Sessile serrated lesion detection rates continue to increase: 2008–2020
title_fullStr Sessile serrated lesion detection rates continue to increase: 2008–2020
title_full_unstemmed Sessile serrated lesion detection rates continue to increase: 2008–2020
title_short Sessile serrated lesion detection rates continue to increase: 2008–2020
title_sort sessile serrated lesion detection rates continue to increase: 2008–2020
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9879655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36712908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1990-0509
work_keys_str_mv AT edwardsonnicholas sessileserratedlesiondetectionratescontinuetoincrease20082020
AT adsulprajakta sessileserratedlesiondetectionratescontinuetoincrease20082020
AT gonzalezzorisadday sessileserratedlesiondetectionratescontinuetoincrease20082020
AT pankratzvshane sessileserratedlesiondetectionratescontinuetoincrease20082020
AT parashergulshan sessileserratedlesiondetectionratescontinuetoincrease20082020
AT englishkevin sessileserratedlesiondetectionratescontinuetoincrease20082020
AT mishrashiraz sessileserratedlesiondetectionratescontinuetoincrease20082020