Cargando…
Sessile serrated lesion detection rates continue to increase: 2008–2020
Background and study aims We assessed sessile serrated lesion detection rate (SSLDR) at a large academic medical center from 2008 to 2020 and modeled a local, aspirational target SSLDR. We also assessed SSLDRs among all gastroenterology fellows to better understand the relationship between SSLDRs a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9879655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36712908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1990-0509 |
_version_ | 1784878739475136512 |
---|---|
author | Edwardson, Nicholas Adsul, Prajakta Gonzalez, Zorisadday Pankratz, V. Shane Parasher, Gulshan English, Kevin Mishra, Shiraz |
author_facet | Edwardson, Nicholas Adsul, Prajakta Gonzalez, Zorisadday Pankratz, V. Shane Parasher, Gulshan English, Kevin Mishra, Shiraz |
author_sort | Edwardson, Nicholas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and study aims We assessed sessile serrated lesion detection rate (SSLDR) at a large academic medical center from 2008 to 2020 and modeled a local, aspirational target SSLDR. We also assessed SSLDRs among all gastroenterology fellows to better understand the relationship between SSLDRs and total colonoscopies performed. Patients and methods SSL-positive pathology results were flagged from a dataset composed of all screening colonoscopies for average-risk patients from 2008 to 2020. Unadjusted SSLDRs were calculated for individual endoscopists by year. A mixed effects logistic regression was used to estimate the log odds of SSL detection, with one model estimating division-wide predictors of SSL detection and a second model focused exclusively on colonoscopies performed by fellows. Model-adjusted SSLDRs were estimated for all 13 years and across both categories of all endoscopists and fellows only. Results Adjusted SSLDRs showed a consistent improvement in SSLDR from a low of 0.37 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.10–0.63) in 2008 to a high of 7.94 % (95 % CI: 6.34–9.54) in 2020. Among fellows only, the odds of SSL detection were significantly lower during their first year compared to their second year (OR: 0.80, 95 % CI: 0.66–0.98) but not significantly higher in their third year compared to their second year (OR: 1.09, 95 % CI: 0.85–1.4). Conclusions SSLDR increased steadily and significantly throughout our study period but variance among endoscopists persists. The peak SSLDR from 2020 of 7.94 % should serve as the local aspirational target for this division’s attendings and fellows but should be continuously reevaluated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9879655 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98796552023-01-27 Sessile serrated lesion detection rates continue to increase: 2008–2020 Edwardson, Nicholas Adsul, Prajakta Gonzalez, Zorisadday Pankratz, V. Shane Parasher, Gulshan English, Kevin Mishra, Shiraz Endosc Int Open Background and study aims We assessed sessile serrated lesion detection rate (SSLDR) at a large academic medical center from 2008 to 2020 and modeled a local, aspirational target SSLDR. We also assessed SSLDRs among all gastroenterology fellows to better understand the relationship between SSLDRs and total colonoscopies performed. Patients and methods SSL-positive pathology results were flagged from a dataset composed of all screening colonoscopies for average-risk patients from 2008 to 2020. Unadjusted SSLDRs were calculated for individual endoscopists by year. A mixed effects logistic regression was used to estimate the log odds of SSL detection, with one model estimating division-wide predictors of SSL detection and a second model focused exclusively on colonoscopies performed by fellows. Model-adjusted SSLDRs were estimated for all 13 years and across both categories of all endoscopists and fellows only. Results Adjusted SSLDRs showed a consistent improvement in SSLDR from a low of 0.37 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.10–0.63) in 2008 to a high of 7.94 % (95 % CI: 6.34–9.54) in 2020. Among fellows only, the odds of SSL detection were significantly lower during their first year compared to their second year (OR: 0.80, 95 % CI: 0.66–0.98) but not significantly higher in their third year compared to their second year (OR: 1.09, 95 % CI: 0.85–1.4). Conclusions SSLDR increased steadily and significantly throughout our study period but variance among endoscopists persists. The peak SSLDR from 2020 of 7.94 % should serve as the local aspirational target for this division’s attendings and fellows but should be continuously reevaluated. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2023-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9879655/ /pubmed/36712908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1990-0509 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Edwardson, Nicholas Adsul, Prajakta Gonzalez, Zorisadday Pankratz, V. Shane Parasher, Gulshan English, Kevin Mishra, Shiraz Sessile serrated lesion detection rates continue to increase: 2008–2020 |
title | Sessile serrated lesion detection rates continue to increase: 2008–2020 |
title_full | Sessile serrated lesion detection rates continue to increase: 2008–2020 |
title_fullStr | Sessile serrated lesion detection rates continue to increase: 2008–2020 |
title_full_unstemmed | Sessile serrated lesion detection rates continue to increase: 2008–2020 |
title_short | Sessile serrated lesion detection rates continue to increase: 2008–2020 |
title_sort | sessile serrated lesion detection rates continue to increase: 2008–2020 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9879655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36712908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1990-0509 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT edwardsonnicholas sessileserratedlesiondetectionratescontinuetoincrease20082020 AT adsulprajakta sessileserratedlesiondetectionratescontinuetoincrease20082020 AT gonzalezzorisadday sessileserratedlesiondetectionratescontinuetoincrease20082020 AT pankratzvshane sessileserratedlesiondetectionratescontinuetoincrease20082020 AT parashergulshan sessileserratedlesiondetectionratescontinuetoincrease20082020 AT englishkevin sessileserratedlesiondetectionratescontinuetoincrease20082020 AT mishrashiraz sessileserratedlesiondetectionratescontinuetoincrease20082020 |