Cargando…

A Systematic Review of Parent–Child Communication Measures: Instruments and Their Psychometric Properties

Parent–child communication represents an important variable in clinical child and family psychology due to its association with a variety of psychosocial outcomes. To give an overview of instruments designed to measure the quality of parent–child communication from the child’s (8–21 years) perspecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zapf, Holger, Boettcher, Johannes, Haukeland, Yngvild, Orm, Stian, Coslar, Sarah, Wiegand-Grefe, Silke, Fjermestad, Krister
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9879831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36166179
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10567-022-00414-3
_version_ 1784878775541956608
author Zapf, Holger
Boettcher, Johannes
Haukeland, Yngvild
Orm, Stian
Coslar, Sarah
Wiegand-Grefe, Silke
Fjermestad, Krister
author_facet Zapf, Holger
Boettcher, Johannes
Haukeland, Yngvild
Orm, Stian
Coslar, Sarah
Wiegand-Grefe, Silke
Fjermestad, Krister
author_sort Zapf, Holger
collection PubMed
description Parent–child communication represents an important variable in clinical child and family psychology due to its association with a variety of psychosocial outcomes. To give an overview of instruments designed to measure the quality of parent–child communication from the child’s (8–21 years) perspective and to assess the psychometric quality of these instruments, we performed a systematic literature search in Medline and PsycInfo (last: February 25, 2022). Peer-reviewed journal articles published in English with a child-rated instrument measuring the quality of parent–child communication were included. Initial screening for eligibility and inclusion, subsequent data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted by couples of review team members. Based on the screening of 5115 articles, 106 studies reported in 126 papers were included. We identified 12 parent–child communication instruments across the studies. The Parent-Adolescent Communication Scale (PACS) was used in 75% of the studies. On average, the evidence for psychometric quality of the instruments was low. Few instruments were used in clinical and at-risk samples. Several instruments are available to rate parent–child communication from the child’s perspective. However, their psychometric evidence is limited and the theoretical foundation is largely undocumented. This review has limitations with regard to selection criteria and language bias. Registration PROSPERO: CRD42021255264. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10567-022-00414-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9879831
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98798312023-01-28 A Systematic Review of Parent–Child Communication Measures: Instruments and Their Psychometric Properties Zapf, Holger Boettcher, Johannes Haukeland, Yngvild Orm, Stian Coslar, Sarah Wiegand-Grefe, Silke Fjermestad, Krister Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev Article Parent–child communication represents an important variable in clinical child and family psychology due to its association with a variety of psychosocial outcomes. To give an overview of instruments designed to measure the quality of parent–child communication from the child’s (8–21 years) perspective and to assess the psychometric quality of these instruments, we performed a systematic literature search in Medline and PsycInfo (last: February 25, 2022). Peer-reviewed journal articles published in English with a child-rated instrument measuring the quality of parent–child communication were included. Initial screening for eligibility and inclusion, subsequent data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted by couples of review team members. Based on the screening of 5115 articles, 106 studies reported in 126 papers were included. We identified 12 parent–child communication instruments across the studies. The Parent-Adolescent Communication Scale (PACS) was used in 75% of the studies. On average, the evidence for psychometric quality of the instruments was low. Few instruments were used in clinical and at-risk samples. Several instruments are available to rate parent–child communication from the child’s perspective. However, their psychometric evidence is limited and the theoretical foundation is largely undocumented. This review has limitations with regard to selection criteria and language bias. Registration PROSPERO: CRD42021255264. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10567-022-00414-3. Springer US 2022-09-27 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9879831/ /pubmed/36166179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10567-022-00414-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Zapf, Holger
Boettcher, Johannes
Haukeland, Yngvild
Orm, Stian
Coslar, Sarah
Wiegand-Grefe, Silke
Fjermestad, Krister
A Systematic Review of Parent–Child Communication Measures: Instruments and Their Psychometric Properties
title A Systematic Review of Parent–Child Communication Measures: Instruments and Their Psychometric Properties
title_full A Systematic Review of Parent–Child Communication Measures: Instruments and Their Psychometric Properties
title_fullStr A Systematic Review of Parent–Child Communication Measures: Instruments and Their Psychometric Properties
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review of Parent–Child Communication Measures: Instruments and Their Psychometric Properties
title_short A Systematic Review of Parent–Child Communication Measures: Instruments and Their Psychometric Properties
title_sort systematic review of parent–child communication measures: instruments and their psychometric properties
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9879831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36166179
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10567-022-00414-3
work_keys_str_mv AT zapfholger asystematicreviewofparentchildcommunicationmeasuresinstrumentsandtheirpsychometricproperties
AT boettcherjohannes asystematicreviewofparentchildcommunicationmeasuresinstrumentsandtheirpsychometricproperties
AT haukelandyngvild asystematicreviewofparentchildcommunicationmeasuresinstrumentsandtheirpsychometricproperties
AT ormstian asystematicreviewofparentchildcommunicationmeasuresinstrumentsandtheirpsychometricproperties
AT coslarsarah asystematicreviewofparentchildcommunicationmeasuresinstrumentsandtheirpsychometricproperties
AT wiegandgrefesilke asystematicreviewofparentchildcommunicationmeasuresinstrumentsandtheirpsychometricproperties
AT fjermestadkrister asystematicreviewofparentchildcommunicationmeasuresinstrumentsandtheirpsychometricproperties
AT zapfholger systematicreviewofparentchildcommunicationmeasuresinstrumentsandtheirpsychometricproperties
AT boettcherjohannes systematicreviewofparentchildcommunicationmeasuresinstrumentsandtheirpsychometricproperties
AT haukelandyngvild systematicreviewofparentchildcommunicationmeasuresinstrumentsandtheirpsychometricproperties
AT ormstian systematicreviewofparentchildcommunicationmeasuresinstrumentsandtheirpsychometricproperties
AT coslarsarah systematicreviewofparentchildcommunicationmeasuresinstrumentsandtheirpsychometricproperties
AT wiegandgrefesilke systematicreviewofparentchildcommunicationmeasuresinstrumentsandtheirpsychometricproperties
AT fjermestadkrister systematicreviewofparentchildcommunicationmeasuresinstrumentsandtheirpsychometricproperties