Cargando…
A Systematic Review of Parent–Child Communication Measures: Instruments and Their Psychometric Properties
Parent–child communication represents an important variable in clinical child and family psychology due to its association with a variety of psychosocial outcomes. To give an overview of instruments designed to measure the quality of parent–child communication from the child’s (8–21 years) perspecti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9879831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36166179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10567-022-00414-3 |
_version_ | 1784878775541956608 |
---|---|
author | Zapf, Holger Boettcher, Johannes Haukeland, Yngvild Orm, Stian Coslar, Sarah Wiegand-Grefe, Silke Fjermestad, Krister |
author_facet | Zapf, Holger Boettcher, Johannes Haukeland, Yngvild Orm, Stian Coslar, Sarah Wiegand-Grefe, Silke Fjermestad, Krister |
author_sort | Zapf, Holger |
collection | PubMed |
description | Parent–child communication represents an important variable in clinical child and family psychology due to its association with a variety of psychosocial outcomes. To give an overview of instruments designed to measure the quality of parent–child communication from the child’s (8–21 years) perspective and to assess the psychometric quality of these instruments, we performed a systematic literature search in Medline and PsycInfo (last: February 25, 2022). Peer-reviewed journal articles published in English with a child-rated instrument measuring the quality of parent–child communication were included. Initial screening for eligibility and inclusion, subsequent data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted by couples of review team members. Based on the screening of 5115 articles, 106 studies reported in 126 papers were included. We identified 12 parent–child communication instruments across the studies. The Parent-Adolescent Communication Scale (PACS) was used in 75% of the studies. On average, the evidence for psychometric quality of the instruments was low. Few instruments were used in clinical and at-risk samples. Several instruments are available to rate parent–child communication from the child’s perspective. However, their psychometric evidence is limited and the theoretical foundation is largely undocumented. This review has limitations with regard to selection criteria and language bias. Registration PROSPERO: CRD42021255264. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10567-022-00414-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9879831 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98798312023-01-28 A Systematic Review of Parent–Child Communication Measures: Instruments and Their Psychometric Properties Zapf, Holger Boettcher, Johannes Haukeland, Yngvild Orm, Stian Coslar, Sarah Wiegand-Grefe, Silke Fjermestad, Krister Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev Article Parent–child communication represents an important variable in clinical child and family psychology due to its association with a variety of psychosocial outcomes. To give an overview of instruments designed to measure the quality of parent–child communication from the child’s (8–21 years) perspective and to assess the psychometric quality of these instruments, we performed a systematic literature search in Medline and PsycInfo (last: February 25, 2022). Peer-reviewed journal articles published in English with a child-rated instrument measuring the quality of parent–child communication were included. Initial screening for eligibility and inclusion, subsequent data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted by couples of review team members. Based on the screening of 5115 articles, 106 studies reported in 126 papers were included. We identified 12 parent–child communication instruments across the studies. The Parent-Adolescent Communication Scale (PACS) was used in 75% of the studies. On average, the evidence for psychometric quality of the instruments was low. Few instruments were used in clinical and at-risk samples. Several instruments are available to rate parent–child communication from the child’s perspective. However, their psychometric evidence is limited and the theoretical foundation is largely undocumented. This review has limitations with regard to selection criteria and language bias. Registration PROSPERO: CRD42021255264. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10567-022-00414-3. Springer US 2022-09-27 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9879831/ /pubmed/36166179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10567-022-00414-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Zapf, Holger Boettcher, Johannes Haukeland, Yngvild Orm, Stian Coslar, Sarah Wiegand-Grefe, Silke Fjermestad, Krister A Systematic Review of Parent–Child Communication Measures: Instruments and Their Psychometric Properties |
title | A Systematic Review of Parent–Child Communication Measures: Instruments and Their Psychometric Properties |
title_full | A Systematic Review of Parent–Child Communication Measures: Instruments and Their Psychometric Properties |
title_fullStr | A Systematic Review of Parent–Child Communication Measures: Instruments and Their Psychometric Properties |
title_full_unstemmed | A Systematic Review of Parent–Child Communication Measures: Instruments and Their Psychometric Properties |
title_short | A Systematic Review of Parent–Child Communication Measures: Instruments and Their Psychometric Properties |
title_sort | systematic review of parent–child communication measures: instruments and their psychometric properties |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9879831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36166179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10567-022-00414-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zapfholger asystematicreviewofparentchildcommunicationmeasuresinstrumentsandtheirpsychometricproperties AT boettcherjohannes asystematicreviewofparentchildcommunicationmeasuresinstrumentsandtheirpsychometricproperties AT haukelandyngvild asystematicreviewofparentchildcommunicationmeasuresinstrumentsandtheirpsychometricproperties AT ormstian asystematicreviewofparentchildcommunicationmeasuresinstrumentsandtheirpsychometricproperties AT coslarsarah asystematicreviewofparentchildcommunicationmeasuresinstrumentsandtheirpsychometricproperties AT wiegandgrefesilke asystematicreviewofparentchildcommunicationmeasuresinstrumentsandtheirpsychometricproperties AT fjermestadkrister asystematicreviewofparentchildcommunicationmeasuresinstrumentsandtheirpsychometricproperties AT zapfholger systematicreviewofparentchildcommunicationmeasuresinstrumentsandtheirpsychometricproperties AT boettcherjohannes systematicreviewofparentchildcommunicationmeasuresinstrumentsandtheirpsychometricproperties AT haukelandyngvild systematicreviewofparentchildcommunicationmeasuresinstrumentsandtheirpsychometricproperties AT ormstian systematicreviewofparentchildcommunicationmeasuresinstrumentsandtheirpsychometricproperties AT coslarsarah systematicreviewofparentchildcommunicationmeasuresinstrumentsandtheirpsychometricproperties AT wiegandgrefesilke systematicreviewofparentchildcommunicationmeasuresinstrumentsandtheirpsychometricproperties AT fjermestadkrister systematicreviewofparentchildcommunicationmeasuresinstrumentsandtheirpsychometricproperties |