Cargando…

A systematic review of real-world healthcare resource use and costs of Clostridioides difficile infections

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of published real-world evidence describing the cost and healthcare resource use for Clostridiodes difficile infection (CDI) in the United States. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted searching for terms for CDI and healthcare costs. Titles...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malone, Daniel C., Armstrong, Edward P., Gratie, Dan, Pham, Sissi V., Amin, Alpesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9879868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36714290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2022.369
_version_ 1784878783775375360
author Malone, Daniel C.
Armstrong, Edward P.
Gratie, Dan
Pham, Sissi V.
Amin, Alpesh
author_facet Malone, Daniel C.
Armstrong, Edward P.
Gratie, Dan
Pham, Sissi V.
Amin, Alpesh
author_sort Malone, Daniel C.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of published real-world evidence describing the cost and healthcare resource use for Clostridiodes difficile infection (CDI) in the United States. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted searching for terms for CDI and healthcare costs. Titles of articles and abstracts were reviewed to identify those that met study criteria. Studies were evaluated to examine overall design and comparison groups in terms of healthcare resource use and cost for CDI. RESULTS: In total, 28 articles met the inclusion criteria. Moreover, 20 studies evaluated primary CDI or did not specify, and 8 studies( 1–8 ) evaluated both primary CDI and recurrent (rCDI). Data from Medicare were used in 6 studies. Nearly all studies used a comparison group, either controls without CDI (N = 20) or comparison between primary CDI and rCDI (N = 7). Two studies examined costs of rCDI by the number of recurrences. Overall, the burden of CDI is significant, with higher aggregate costs for patients with rCDI. Compared with non-CDI controls, hospital length of stay increased in patients with both primary and rCDI compared to patients without CDI. Patients with primary CDI cost healthcare systems $24,000 more than patients without CDI. Additionally, 2 studies that evaluated the impact of recurrence among those patients with an index case of CDI demonstrated significantly higher direct all-cause medical costs among those with rCDI compared to those without. CONCLUSION: CDI, and particularly rCDI, is a costly condition with hospitalizations being the main cost driver.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9879868
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98798682023-01-28 A systematic review of real-world healthcare resource use and costs of Clostridioides difficile infections Malone, Daniel C. Armstrong, Edward P. Gratie, Dan Pham, Sissi V. Amin, Alpesh Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of published real-world evidence describing the cost and healthcare resource use for Clostridiodes difficile infection (CDI) in the United States. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted searching for terms for CDI and healthcare costs. Titles of articles and abstracts were reviewed to identify those that met study criteria. Studies were evaluated to examine overall design and comparison groups in terms of healthcare resource use and cost for CDI. RESULTS: In total, 28 articles met the inclusion criteria. Moreover, 20 studies evaluated primary CDI or did not specify, and 8 studies( 1–8 ) evaluated both primary CDI and recurrent (rCDI). Data from Medicare were used in 6 studies. Nearly all studies used a comparison group, either controls without CDI (N = 20) or comparison between primary CDI and rCDI (N = 7). Two studies examined costs of rCDI by the number of recurrences. Overall, the burden of CDI is significant, with higher aggregate costs for patients with rCDI. Compared with non-CDI controls, hospital length of stay increased in patients with both primary and rCDI compared to patients without CDI. Patients with primary CDI cost healthcare systems $24,000 more than patients without CDI. Additionally, 2 studies that evaluated the impact of recurrence among those patients with an index case of CDI demonstrated significantly higher direct all-cause medical costs among those with rCDI compared to those without. CONCLUSION: CDI, and particularly rCDI, is a costly condition with hospitalizations being the main cost driver. Cambridge University Press 2023-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9879868/ /pubmed/36714290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2022.369 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Malone, Daniel C.
Armstrong, Edward P.
Gratie, Dan
Pham, Sissi V.
Amin, Alpesh
A systematic review of real-world healthcare resource use and costs of Clostridioides difficile infections
title A systematic review of real-world healthcare resource use and costs of Clostridioides difficile infections
title_full A systematic review of real-world healthcare resource use and costs of Clostridioides difficile infections
title_fullStr A systematic review of real-world healthcare resource use and costs of Clostridioides difficile infections
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of real-world healthcare resource use and costs of Clostridioides difficile infections
title_short A systematic review of real-world healthcare resource use and costs of Clostridioides difficile infections
title_sort systematic review of real-world healthcare resource use and costs of clostridioides difficile infections
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9879868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36714290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2022.369
work_keys_str_mv AT malonedanielc asystematicreviewofrealworldhealthcareresourceuseandcostsofclostridioidesdifficileinfections
AT armstrongedwardp asystematicreviewofrealworldhealthcareresourceuseandcostsofclostridioidesdifficileinfections
AT gratiedan asystematicreviewofrealworldhealthcareresourceuseandcostsofclostridioidesdifficileinfections
AT phamsissiv asystematicreviewofrealworldhealthcareresourceuseandcostsofclostridioidesdifficileinfections
AT aminalpesh asystematicreviewofrealworldhealthcareresourceuseandcostsofclostridioidesdifficileinfections
AT malonedanielc systematicreviewofrealworldhealthcareresourceuseandcostsofclostridioidesdifficileinfections
AT armstrongedwardp systematicreviewofrealworldhealthcareresourceuseandcostsofclostridioidesdifficileinfections
AT gratiedan systematicreviewofrealworldhealthcareresourceuseandcostsofclostridioidesdifficileinfections
AT phamsissiv systematicreviewofrealworldhealthcareresourceuseandcostsofclostridioidesdifficileinfections
AT aminalpesh systematicreviewofrealworldhealthcareresourceuseandcostsofclostridioidesdifficileinfections