Cargando…
Clinical impact of a multiplex rapid diagnostic pneumonia panel in critically ill patients
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical impact of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel (PNA panel) in critically ill patients. DESIGN: Single-center, preintervention and postintervention retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary-care academic medical center. PATIENTS: Adult ICU patients. METHODS: P...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9879924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36714280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2022.358 |
_version_ | 1784878797295714304 |
---|---|
author | Esplund, Jayda N. Taylor, Alex D. Stone, Tyler J. Palavecino, Elizabeth L. Kilic, Abdullah Luther, Vera P. Ohl, Christopher A. Beardsley, James R. |
author_facet | Esplund, Jayda N. Taylor, Alex D. Stone, Tyler J. Palavecino, Elizabeth L. Kilic, Abdullah Luther, Vera P. Ohl, Christopher A. Beardsley, James R. |
author_sort | Esplund, Jayda N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical impact of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel (PNA panel) in critically ill patients. DESIGN: Single-center, preintervention and postintervention retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary-care academic medical center. PATIENTS: Adult ICU patients. METHODS: Patients with quantitative bacterial cultures obtained by bronchoalveolar lavage or tracheal aspirate either before (January–March 2021, preintervention period) or after (January–March 2022, postintervention period) implementation of the PNA panel were randomly screened until 25 patients per study month (75 in each cohort) who met the study criteria were included. Antibiotic use from the day of culture collection through day 5 was compared. RESULTS: The primary outcome of median time to first antibiotic change based on microbiologic data was 50 hours before the intervention versus 21 hours after the intervention (P = .0006). Also, 56 postintervention regimens (75%) were eligible for change based on PNA panel results; actual change occurred in 30 regimens (54%). Median antibiotic days of therapy (DOTs) were 8 before the intervention versus 6 after the intervention (P = .07). For the patients with antibiotic changes made based on PNA panel results, the median time to first antibiotic change was 10 hours. For patients who were initially on inadequate therapy, time to adequate therapy was 67 hours before the intervention versus 37 hours after the intervention (P = .27). CONCLUSIONS: The PNA panel was associated with decreased time to first antibiotic change and fewer antibiotic DOTs. Its impact may have been larger if a higher percentage of potential antibiotic changes had been implemented. The PNA panel is a promising tool to enhance antibiotic stewardship. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9879924 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98799242023-01-28 Clinical impact of a multiplex rapid diagnostic pneumonia panel in critically ill patients Esplund, Jayda N. Taylor, Alex D. Stone, Tyler J. Palavecino, Elizabeth L. Kilic, Abdullah Luther, Vera P. Ohl, Christopher A. Beardsley, James R. Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical impact of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel (PNA panel) in critically ill patients. DESIGN: Single-center, preintervention and postintervention retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary-care academic medical center. PATIENTS: Adult ICU patients. METHODS: Patients with quantitative bacterial cultures obtained by bronchoalveolar lavage or tracheal aspirate either before (January–March 2021, preintervention period) or after (January–March 2022, postintervention period) implementation of the PNA panel were randomly screened until 25 patients per study month (75 in each cohort) who met the study criteria were included. Antibiotic use from the day of culture collection through day 5 was compared. RESULTS: The primary outcome of median time to first antibiotic change based on microbiologic data was 50 hours before the intervention versus 21 hours after the intervention (P = .0006). Also, 56 postintervention regimens (75%) were eligible for change based on PNA panel results; actual change occurred in 30 regimens (54%). Median antibiotic days of therapy (DOTs) were 8 before the intervention versus 6 after the intervention (P = .07). For the patients with antibiotic changes made based on PNA panel results, the median time to first antibiotic change was 10 hours. For patients who were initially on inadequate therapy, time to adequate therapy was 67 hours before the intervention versus 37 hours after the intervention (P = .27). CONCLUSIONS: The PNA panel was associated with decreased time to first antibiotic change and fewer antibiotic DOTs. Its impact may have been larger if a higher percentage of potential antibiotic changes had been implemented. The PNA panel is a promising tool to enhance antibiotic stewardship. Cambridge University Press 2023-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9879924/ /pubmed/36714280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2022.358 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Esplund, Jayda N. Taylor, Alex D. Stone, Tyler J. Palavecino, Elizabeth L. Kilic, Abdullah Luther, Vera P. Ohl, Christopher A. Beardsley, James R. Clinical impact of a multiplex rapid diagnostic pneumonia panel in critically ill patients |
title | Clinical impact of a multiplex rapid diagnostic pneumonia panel in critically ill patients |
title_full | Clinical impact of a multiplex rapid diagnostic pneumonia panel in critically ill patients |
title_fullStr | Clinical impact of a multiplex rapid diagnostic pneumonia panel in critically ill patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical impact of a multiplex rapid diagnostic pneumonia panel in critically ill patients |
title_short | Clinical impact of a multiplex rapid diagnostic pneumonia panel in critically ill patients |
title_sort | clinical impact of a multiplex rapid diagnostic pneumonia panel in critically ill patients |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9879924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36714280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2022.358 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT esplundjaydan clinicalimpactofamultiplexrapiddiagnosticpneumoniapanelincriticallyillpatients AT tayloralexd clinicalimpactofamultiplexrapiddiagnosticpneumoniapanelincriticallyillpatients AT stonetylerj clinicalimpactofamultiplexrapiddiagnosticpneumoniapanelincriticallyillpatients AT palavecinoelizabethl clinicalimpactofamultiplexrapiddiagnosticpneumoniapanelincriticallyillpatients AT kilicabdullah clinicalimpactofamultiplexrapiddiagnosticpneumoniapanelincriticallyillpatients AT lutherverap clinicalimpactofamultiplexrapiddiagnosticpneumoniapanelincriticallyillpatients AT ohlchristophera clinicalimpactofamultiplexrapiddiagnosticpneumoniapanelincriticallyillpatients AT beardsleyjamesr clinicalimpactofamultiplexrapiddiagnosticpneumoniapanelincriticallyillpatients |