Cargando…

Clinical impact of a multiplex rapid diagnostic pneumonia panel in critically ill patients

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical impact of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel (PNA panel) in critically ill patients. DESIGN: Single-center, preintervention and postintervention retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary-care academic medical center. PATIENTS: Adult ICU patients. METHODS: P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Esplund, Jayda N., Taylor, Alex D., Stone, Tyler J., Palavecino, Elizabeth L., Kilic, Abdullah, Luther, Vera P., Ohl, Christopher A., Beardsley, James R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9879924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36714280
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2022.358
_version_ 1784878797295714304
author Esplund, Jayda N.
Taylor, Alex D.
Stone, Tyler J.
Palavecino, Elizabeth L.
Kilic, Abdullah
Luther, Vera P.
Ohl, Christopher A.
Beardsley, James R.
author_facet Esplund, Jayda N.
Taylor, Alex D.
Stone, Tyler J.
Palavecino, Elizabeth L.
Kilic, Abdullah
Luther, Vera P.
Ohl, Christopher A.
Beardsley, James R.
author_sort Esplund, Jayda N.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical impact of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel (PNA panel) in critically ill patients. DESIGN: Single-center, preintervention and postintervention retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary-care academic medical center. PATIENTS: Adult ICU patients. METHODS: Patients with quantitative bacterial cultures obtained by bronchoalveolar lavage or tracheal aspirate either before (January–March 2021, preintervention period) or after (January–March 2022, postintervention period) implementation of the PNA panel were randomly screened until 25 patients per study month (75 in each cohort) who met the study criteria were included. Antibiotic use from the day of culture collection through day 5 was compared. RESULTS: The primary outcome of median time to first antibiotic change based on microbiologic data was 50 hours before the intervention versus 21 hours after the intervention (P = .0006). Also, 56 postintervention regimens (75%) were eligible for change based on PNA panel results; actual change occurred in 30 regimens (54%). Median antibiotic days of therapy (DOTs) were 8 before the intervention versus 6 after the intervention (P = .07). For the patients with antibiotic changes made based on PNA panel results, the median time to first antibiotic change was 10 hours. For patients who were initially on inadequate therapy, time to adequate therapy was 67 hours before the intervention versus 37 hours after the intervention (P = .27). CONCLUSIONS: The PNA panel was associated with decreased time to first antibiotic change and fewer antibiotic DOTs. Its impact may have been larger if a higher percentage of potential antibiotic changes had been implemented. The PNA panel is a promising tool to enhance antibiotic stewardship.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9879924
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98799242023-01-28 Clinical impact of a multiplex rapid diagnostic pneumonia panel in critically ill patients Esplund, Jayda N. Taylor, Alex D. Stone, Tyler J. Palavecino, Elizabeth L. Kilic, Abdullah Luther, Vera P. Ohl, Christopher A. Beardsley, James R. Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical impact of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel (PNA panel) in critically ill patients. DESIGN: Single-center, preintervention and postintervention retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary-care academic medical center. PATIENTS: Adult ICU patients. METHODS: Patients with quantitative bacterial cultures obtained by bronchoalveolar lavage or tracheal aspirate either before (January–March 2021, preintervention period) or after (January–March 2022, postintervention period) implementation of the PNA panel were randomly screened until 25 patients per study month (75 in each cohort) who met the study criteria were included. Antibiotic use from the day of culture collection through day 5 was compared. RESULTS: The primary outcome of median time to first antibiotic change based on microbiologic data was 50 hours before the intervention versus 21 hours after the intervention (P = .0006). Also, 56 postintervention regimens (75%) were eligible for change based on PNA panel results; actual change occurred in 30 regimens (54%). Median antibiotic days of therapy (DOTs) were 8 before the intervention versus 6 after the intervention (P = .07). For the patients with antibiotic changes made based on PNA panel results, the median time to first antibiotic change was 10 hours. For patients who were initially on inadequate therapy, time to adequate therapy was 67 hours before the intervention versus 37 hours after the intervention (P = .27). CONCLUSIONS: The PNA panel was associated with decreased time to first antibiotic change and fewer antibiotic DOTs. Its impact may have been larger if a higher percentage of potential antibiotic changes had been implemented. The PNA panel is a promising tool to enhance antibiotic stewardship. Cambridge University Press 2023-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9879924/ /pubmed/36714280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2022.358 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Esplund, Jayda N.
Taylor, Alex D.
Stone, Tyler J.
Palavecino, Elizabeth L.
Kilic, Abdullah
Luther, Vera P.
Ohl, Christopher A.
Beardsley, James R.
Clinical impact of a multiplex rapid diagnostic pneumonia panel in critically ill patients
title Clinical impact of a multiplex rapid diagnostic pneumonia panel in critically ill patients
title_full Clinical impact of a multiplex rapid diagnostic pneumonia panel in critically ill patients
title_fullStr Clinical impact of a multiplex rapid diagnostic pneumonia panel in critically ill patients
title_full_unstemmed Clinical impact of a multiplex rapid diagnostic pneumonia panel in critically ill patients
title_short Clinical impact of a multiplex rapid diagnostic pneumonia panel in critically ill patients
title_sort clinical impact of a multiplex rapid diagnostic pneumonia panel in critically ill patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9879924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36714280
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2022.358
work_keys_str_mv AT esplundjaydan clinicalimpactofamultiplexrapiddiagnosticpneumoniapanelincriticallyillpatients
AT tayloralexd clinicalimpactofamultiplexrapiddiagnosticpneumoniapanelincriticallyillpatients
AT stonetylerj clinicalimpactofamultiplexrapiddiagnosticpneumoniapanelincriticallyillpatients
AT palavecinoelizabethl clinicalimpactofamultiplexrapiddiagnosticpneumoniapanelincriticallyillpatients
AT kilicabdullah clinicalimpactofamultiplexrapiddiagnosticpneumoniapanelincriticallyillpatients
AT lutherverap clinicalimpactofamultiplexrapiddiagnosticpneumoniapanelincriticallyillpatients
AT ohlchristophera clinicalimpactofamultiplexrapiddiagnosticpneumoniapanelincriticallyillpatients
AT beardsleyjamesr clinicalimpactofamultiplexrapiddiagnosticpneumoniapanelincriticallyillpatients