Cargando…

The usefulness of laparoscopic surgery for inguinal endometriosis

BACKGROUND: Inguinal endometriosis is a rare clinical disease with an unclear etiology and pathogenesis, and its diagnosis requires accurate medical history-taking and histological examination. However, surgical treatment for the condition has not yet been standardized. This report presents two case...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mushiake, Shu, Kawaguchi, Nao, Asakuma, Mitsuhiro, Komeda, Koji, Shimizu, Tetsunosuke, Hirokawa, Fumitoshi, Shimomura, Tomoo, Lee, Sang-Woong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9880114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36701044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40792-022-01571-x
_version_ 1784878837272674304
author Mushiake, Shu
Kawaguchi, Nao
Asakuma, Mitsuhiro
Komeda, Koji
Shimizu, Tetsunosuke
Hirokawa, Fumitoshi
Shimomura, Tomoo
Lee, Sang-Woong
author_facet Mushiake, Shu
Kawaguchi, Nao
Asakuma, Mitsuhiro
Komeda, Koji
Shimizu, Tetsunosuke
Hirokawa, Fumitoshi
Shimomura, Tomoo
Lee, Sang-Woong
author_sort Mushiake, Shu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Inguinal endometriosis is a rare clinical disease with an unclear etiology and pathogenesis, and its diagnosis requires accurate medical history-taking and histological examination. However, surgical treatment for the condition has not yet been standardized. This report presents two cases of inguinal endometriosis. CASE PRESENTATION: The first patient was a 36-year-old woman who complained of pain and swelling in her right inguinal region. Physical examination revealed a soft, tender right inguinal mass. The size of the mass repeatedly increased and decreased during menstruation and did not show swelling with abdominal pressure. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a 3.5 × 2.5 cm mass with high intensity on T2-weighted imaging in the right inguinal canal, and no communication was found between the lesion site and the abdominal cavity. We diagnosed this case as inguinal endometriosis and managed it using an anterior approach and laparoscopic observation. The second patient was a 51-year-old woman who presented with an intermittently painful mass in her right inguinal region. The mass tended to increase in size, with worsening pain before menstruation. Abdominal computed tomography revealed a 2 × 2 cm cystic mass in the right inguinal region. We made a diagnosis of inguinal ectopic endometriosis and decided to operate via the totally extraperitoneal (TEP) method for excision plus transabdominal observation. The postoperative course in both cases was uneventful with no recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Inguinal endometriosis is a rare entity that should be suspected in patients with cyclical symptoms of inguinal pain and swelling that correlate with their menstrual cycle, which might otherwise be attributed to inguinal hernia. It is crucial to make a preoperative diagnosis based on a careful medical review, physical examination, and imaging studies, and to make an appropriate surgical plan. Particularly, in the case of ectopic inguinal endometriosis involving the canal of Nuck, laparoscopic observation is useful for the intraoperative diagnosis of inguinal endometriosis to help rule out the involvement of other abdominal sites. However, it is important to select and modify the surgical technique to avoid rupturing the endometrisis mass and prevent postoperative recurrence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9880114
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98801142023-01-28 The usefulness of laparoscopic surgery for inguinal endometriosis Mushiake, Shu Kawaguchi, Nao Asakuma, Mitsuhiro Komeda, Koji Shimizu, Tetsunosuke Hirokawa, Fumitoshi Shimomura, Tomoo Lee, Sang-Woong Surg Case Rep Case Report BACKGROUND: Inguinal endometriosis is a rare clinical disease with an unclear etiology and pathogenesis, and its diagnosis requires accurate medical history-taking and histological examination. However, surgical treatment for the condition has not yet been standardized. This report presents two cases of inguinal endometriosis. CASE PRESENTATION: The first patient was a 36-year-old woman who complained of pain and swelling in her right inguinal region. Physical examination revealed a soft, tender right inguinal mass. The size of the mass repeatedly increased and decreased during menstruation and did not show swelling with abdominal pressure. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a 3.5 × 2.5 cm mass with high intensity on T2-weighted imaging in the right inguinal canal, and no communication was found between the lesion site and the abdominal cavity. We diagnosed this case as inguinal endometriosis and managed it using an anterior approach and laparoscopic observation. The second patient was a 51-year-old woman who presented with an intermittently painful mass in her right inguinal region. The mass tended to increase in size, with worsening pain before menstruation. Abdominal computed tomography revealed a 2 × 2 cm cystic mass in the right inguinal region. We made a diagnosis of inguinal ectopic endometriosis and decided to operate via the totally extraperitoneal (TEP) method for excision plus transabdominal observation. The postoperative course in both cases was uneventful with no recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Inguinal endometriosis is a rare entity that should be suspected in patients with cyclical symptoms of inguinal pain and swelling that correlate with their menstrual cycle, which might otherwise be attributed to inguinal hernia. It is crucial to make a preoperative diagnosis based on a careful medical review, physical examination, and imaging studies, and to make an appropriate surgical plan. Particularly, in the case of ectopic inguinal endometriosis involving the canal of Nuck, laparoscopic observation is useful for the intraoperative diagnosis of inguinal endometriosis to help rule out the involvement of other abdominal sites. However, it is important to select and modify the surgical technique to avoid rupturing the endometrisis mass and prevent postoperative recurrence. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9880114/ /pubmed/36701044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40792-022-01571-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Case Report
Mushiake, Shu
Kawaguchi, Nao
Asakuma, Mitsuhiro
Komeda, Koji
Shimizu, Tetsunosuke
Hirokawa, Fumitoshi
Shimomura, Tomoo
Lee, Sang-Woong
The usefulness of laparoscopic surgery for inguinal endometriosis
title The usefulness of laparoscopic surgery for inguinal endometriosis
title_full The usefulness of laparoscopic surgery for inguinal endometriosis
title_fullStr The usefulness of laparoscopic surgery for inguinal endometriosis
title_full_unstemmed The usefulness of laparoscopic surgery for inguinal endometriosis
title_short The usefulness of laparoscopic surgery for inguinal endometriosis
title_sort usefulness of laparoscopic surgery for inguinal endometriosis
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9880114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36701044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40792-022-01571-x
work_keys_str_mv AT mushiakeshu theusefulnessoflaparoscopicsurgeryforinguinalendometriosis
AT kawaguchinao theusefulnessoflaparoscopicsurgeryforinguinalendometriosis
AT asakumamitsuhiro theusefulnessoflaparoscopicsurgeryforinguinalendometriosis
AT komedakoji theusefulnessoflaparoscopicsurgeryforinguinalendometriosis
AT shimizutetsunosuke theusefulnessoflaparoscopicsurgeryforinguinalendometriosis
AT hirokawafumitoshi theusefulnessoflaparoscopicsurgeryforinguinalendometriosis
AT shimomuratomoo theusefulnessoflaparoscopicsurgeryforinguinalendometriosis
AT leesangwoong theusefulnessoflaparoscopicsurgeryforinguinalendometriosis
AT mushiakeshu usefulnessoflaparoscopicsurgeryforinguinalendometriosis
AT kawaguchinao usefulnessoflaparoscopicsurgeryforinguinalendometriosis
AT asakumamitsuhiro usefulnessoflaparoscopicsurgeryforinguinalendometriosis
AT komedakoji usefulnessoflaparoscopicsurgeryforinguinalendometriosis
AT shimizutetsunosuke usefulnessoflaparoscopicsurgeryforinguinalendometriosis
AT hirokawafumitoshi usefulnessoflaparoscopicsurgeryforinguinalendometriosis
AT shimomuratomoo usefulnessoflaparoscopicsurgeryforinguinalendometriosis
AT leesangwoong usefulnessoflaparoscopicsurgeryforinguinalendometriosis