Cargando…

Digital maturity and its determinants in General Practice: A cross-sectional study in 20 countries

BACKGROUND: The extent to which digital technologies are employed to promote the delivery of high-quality healthcare is known as Digital Maturity. Individual and systemic digital maturity are both necessary to ensure a successful, scalable and sustainable digital transformation in healthcare. Howeve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Teixeira, Fábia, Li, Edmond, Laranjo, Liliana, Collins, Claire, Irving, Greg, Fernandez, Maria Jose, Car, Josip, Ungan, Mehmet, Petek, Davorina, Hoffman, Robert, Majeed, Azeem, Nessler, Katarzyna, Lingner, Heidrun, Jimenez, Geronimo, Darzi, Ara, Jácome, Cristina, Neves, Ana Luísa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9880412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36711349
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.962924
_version_ 1784878904690868224
author Teixeira, Fábia
Li, Edmond
Laranjo, Liliana
Collins, Claire
Irving, Greg
Fernandez, Maria Jose
Car, Josip
Ungan, Mehmet
Petek, Davorina
Hoffman, Robert
Majeed, Azeem
Nessler, Katarzyna
Lingner, Heidrun
Jimenez, Geronimo
Darzi, Ara
Jácome, Cristina
Neves, Ana Luísa
author_facet Teixeira, Fábia
Li, Edmond
Laranjo, Liliana
Collins, Claire
Irving, Greg
Fernandez, Maria Jose
Car, Josip
Ungan, Mehmet
Petek, Davorina
Hoffman, Robert
Majeed, Azeem
Nessler, Katarzyna
Lingner, Heidrun
Jimenez, Geronimo
Darzi, Ara
Jácome, Cristina
Neves, Ana Luísa
author_sort Teixeira, Fábia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The extent to which digital technologies are employed to promote the delivery of high-quality healthcare is known as Digital Maturity. Individual and systemic digital maturity are both necessary to ensure a successful, scalable and sustainable digital transformation in healthcare. However, digital maturity in primary care has been scarcely evaluated. OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the digital maturity in General Practice (GP) globally and evaluated its association with participants' demographic characteristics, practice characteristics and features of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) use. METHODS: GPs across 20 countries completed an online questionnaire between June and September 2020. Demographic data, practice characteristics, and features of EHRs use were collected. Digital maturity was evaluated through a framework based on usage, resources and abilities (divided in this study in its collective and individual components), interoperability, general evaluation methods and impact of digital technologies. Each dimension was rated as 1 or 0. The digital maturity score was calculated as the sum of the six dimensions and ranged between 0 to 6 (maximum digital maturity). Multivariable linear regression was used to model the total score, while multivariable logistic regression was used to model the probability of meeting each dimension of the score. RESULTS: One thousand six hundred GPs (61% female, 68% Europeans) participated. GPs had a median digital maturity of 4 (P25–P75: 3–5). Positive associations with digital maturity were found with: male gender [B = 0.18 (95% CI 0.01; 0.36)], use of EHRs for longer periods [B = 0.45 (95% CI 0.35; 0.54)] and higher frequencies of access to EHRs [B = 0.33 (95% CI 0.17; 0.48)]. Practicing in a rural setting was negatively associated with digital maturity [B = −0.25 (95%CI −0.43; −0.08)]. Usage (90%) was the most acknowledged dimension while interoperability (47%) and use of best practice general evaluation methods (28%) were the least. Shorter durations of EHRs use were negatively associated with all digital maturity dimensions (aOR from 0.09 to 0.77). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated notable factors that impact digital maturity and exposed discrepancies in digital transformation across healthcare settings. It provides guidance for policymakers to develop more efficacious interventions to hasten the digital transformation of General Practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9880412
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98804122023-01-28 Digital maturity and its determinants in General Practice: A cross-sectional study in 20 countries Teixeira, Fábia Li, Edmond Laranjo, Liliana Collins, Claire Irving, Greg Fernandez, Maria Jose Car, Josip Ungan, Mehmet Petek, Davorina Hoffman, Robert Majeed, Azeem Nessler, Katarzyna Lingner, Heidrun Jimenez, Geronimo Darzi, Ara Jácome, Cristina Neves, Ana Luísa Front Public Health Public Health BACKGROUND: The extent to which digital technologies are employed to promote the delivery of high-quality healthcare is known as Digital Maturity. Individual and systemic digital maturity are both necessary to ensure a successful, scalable and sustainable digital transformation in healthcare. However, digital maturity in primary care has been scarcely evaluated. OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the digital maturity in General Practice (GP) globally and evaluated its association with participants' demographic characteristics, practice characteristics and features of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) use. METHODS: GPs across 20 countries completed an online questionnaire between June and September 2020. Demographic data, practice characteristics, and features of EHRs use were collected. Digital maturity was evaluated through a framework based on usage, resources and abilities (divided in this study in its collective and individual components), interoperability, general evaluation methods and impact of digital technologies. Each dimension was rated as 1 or 0. The digital maturity score was calculated as the sum of the six dimensions and ranged between 0 to 6 (maximum digital maturity). Multivariable linear regression was used to model the total score, while multivariable logistic regression was used to model the probability of meeting each dimension of the score. RESULTS: One thousand six hundred GPs (61% female, 68% Europeans) participated. GPs had a median digital maturity of 4 (P25–P75: 3–5). Positive associations with digital maturity were found with: male gender [B = 0.18 (95% CI 0.01; 0.36)], use of EHRs for longer periods [B = 0.45 (95% CI 0.35; 0.54)] and higher frequencies of access to EHRs [B = 0.33 (95% CI 0.17; 0.48)]. Practicing in a rural setting was negatively associated with digital maturity [B = −0.25 (95%CI −0.43; −0.08)]. Usage (90%) was the most acknowledged dimension while interoperability (47%) and use of best practice general evaluation methods (28%) were the least. Shorter durations of EHRs use were negatively associated with all digital maturity dimensions (aOR from 0.09 to 0.77). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated notable factors that impact digital maturity and exposed discrepancies in digital transformation across healthcare settings. It provides guidance for policymakers to develop more efficacious interventions to hasten the digital transformation of General Practice. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9880412/ /pubmed/36711349 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.962924 Text en Copyright © 2023 Teixeira, Li, Laranjo, Collins, Irving, Fernandez, Car, Ungan, Petek, Hoffman, Majeed, Nessler, Lingner, Jimenez, Darzi, Jácome and Neves. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Teixeira, Fábia
Li, Edmond
Laranjo, Liliana
Collins, Claire
Irving, Greg
Fernandez, Maria Jose
Car, Josip
Ungan, Mehmet
Petek, Davorina
Hoffman, Robert
Majeed, Azeem
Nessler, Katarzyna
Lingner, Heidrun
Jimenez, Geronimo
Darzi, Ara
Jácome, Cristina
Neves, Ana Luísa
Digital maturity and its determinants in General Practice: A cross-sectional study in 20 countries
title Digital maturity and its determinants in General Practice: A cross-sectional study in 20 countries
title_full Digital maturity and its determinants in General Practice: A cross-sectional study in 20 countries
title_fullStr Digital maturity and its determinants in General Practice: A cross-sectional study in 20 countries
title_full_unstemmed Digital maturity and its determinants in General Practice: A cross-sectional study in 20 countries
title_short Digital maturity and its determinants in General Practice: A cross-sectional study in 20 countries
title_sort digital maturity and its determinants in general practice: a cross-sectional study in 20 countries
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9880412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36711349
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.962924
work_keys_str_mv AT teixeirafabia digitalmaturityanditsdeterminantsingeneralpracticeacrosssectionalstudyin20countries
AT liedmond digitalmaturityanditsdeterminantsingeneralpracticeacrosssectionalstudyin20countries
AT laranjoliliana digitalmaturityanditsdeterminantsingeneralpracticeacrosssectionalstudyin20countries
AT collinsclaire digitalmaturityanditsdeterminantsingeneralpracticeacrosssectionalstudyin20countries
AT irvinggreg digitalmaturityanditsdeterminantsingeneralpracticeacrosssectionalstudyin20countries
AT fernandezmariajose digitalmaturityanditsdeterminantsingeneralpracticeacrosssectionalstudyin20countries
AT carjosip digitalmaturityanditsdeterminantsingeneralpracticeacrosssectionalstudyin20countries
AT unganmehmet digitalmaturityanditsdeterminantsingeneralpracticeacrosssectionalstudyin20countries
AT petekdavorina digitalmaturityanditsdeterminantsingeneralpracticeacrosssectionalstudyin20countries
AT hoffmanrobert digitalmaturityanditsdeterminantsingeneralpracticeacrosssectionalstudyin20countries
AT majeedazeem digitalmaturityanditsdeterminantsingeneralpracticeacrosssectionalstudyin20countries
AT nesslerkatarzyna digitalmaturityanditsdeterminantsingeneralpracticeacrosssectionalstudyin20countries
AT lingnerheidrun digitalmaturityanditsdeterminantsingeneralpracticeacrosssectionalstudyin20countries
AT jimenezgeronimo digitalmaturityanditsdeterminantsingeneralpracticeacrosssectionalstudyin20countries
AT darziara digitalmaturityanditsdeterminantsingeneralpracticeacrosssectionalstudyin20countries
AT jacomecristina digitalmaturityanditsdeterminantsingeneralpracticeacrosssectionalstudyin20countries
AT nevesanaluisa digitalmaturityanditsdeterminantsingeneralpracticeacrosssectionalstudyin20countries