Cargando…

Development of the key performance indicators for digital health interventions: A scoping review

BACKGROUND: Digital health interventions offer new methods for delivering healthcare, with the potential to innovate healthcare services. Key performance indicators play a role in the evaluation, measurement, and improvement in healthcare quality and service performance. The aim of this scoping revi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brenner, Maria, Weir, Arielle, McCann, Margaret, Doyle, Carmel, Hughes, Mary, Moen, Anne, Ingvar, Martin, Nauwelaerts, Koen, Turk, Eva, McCabe, Catherine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9880566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36714542
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076231152160
_version_ 1784878942360961024
author Brenner, Maria
Weir, Arielle
McCann, Margaret
Doyle, Carmel
Hughes, Mary
Moen, Anne
Ingvar, Martin
Nauwelaerts, Koen
Turk, Eva
McCabe, Catherine
author_facet Brenner, Maria
Weir, Arielle
McCann, Margaret
Doyle, Carmel
Hughes, Mary
Moen, Anne
Ingvar, Martin
Nauwelaerts, Koen
Turk, Eva
McCabe, Catherine
author_sort Brenner, Maria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Digital health interventions offer new methods for delivering healthcare, with the potential to innovate healthcare services. Key performance indicators play a role in the evaluation, measurement, and improvement in healthcare quality and service performance. The aim of this scoping review was to identify current knowledge and evidence surrounding the development of key performance indicators for digital health interventions. METHODS: A literature search was conducted across ten key databases: AMED – The Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, CINAHL – Complete, Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition, MEDLINE, APA PsycINFO, EMBASE, EBM Reviews – Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, EBM Reviews – Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, EBM Reviews – Health Technology Assessment, and IEEE Xplore. RESULTS: Five references were eligible for the review. Two were articles on original research studies of a specific digital health intervention, and two were overviews of methods for developing digital health interventions (not specific to a single digital health intervention). All the included reports discussed the involvement of stakeholders in developing key performance indicators for digital health interventions. The step of identifying and defining the key performance indicators was completed using various methodologies, but all centred on a form of stakeholder involvement. Potential options for stakeholder involvement for key performance indicator identification include the use of an elicitation framework, a factorial survey approach, or a Delphi study. CONCLUSIONS: Few articles were identified, highlighting a significant gap in evidence-based knowledge in this domain. All the included articles discussed the involvement of stakeholders in developing key performance indicators for digital health interventions, which were performed using various methodologies. The articles acknowledged a lack of literature related to key performance indicator development for digital health interventions. To allow comparability between key performance indicator initiatives and facilitate work in the field, further research would be beneficial to develop a common methodology for key performance indicators development for digital health interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9880566
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98805662023-01-28 Development of the key performance indicators for digital health interventions: A scoping review Brenner, Maria Weir, Arielle McCann, Margaret Doyle, Carmel Hughes, Mary Moen, Anne Ingvar, Martin Nauwelaerts, Koen Turk, Eva McCabe, Catherine Digit Health Review Article BACKGROUND: Digital health interventions offer new methods for delivering healthcare, with the potential to innovate healthcare services. Key performance indicators play a role in the evaluation, measurement, and improvement in healthcare quality and service performance. The aim of this scoping review was to identify current knowledge and evidence surrounding the development of key performance indicators for digital health interventions. METHODS: A literature search was conducted across ten key databases: AMED – The Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, CINAHL – Complete, Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition, MEDLINE, APA PsycINFO, EMBASE, EBM Reviews – Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, EBM Reviews – Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, EBM Reviews – Health Technology Assessment, and IEEE Xplore. RESULTS: Five references were eligible for the review. Two were articles on original research studies of a specific digital health intervention, and two were overviews of methods for developing digital health interventions (not specific to a single digital health intervention). All the included reports discussed the involvement of stakeholders in developing key performance indicators for digital health interventions. The step of identifying and defining the key performance indicators was completed using various methodologies, but all centred on a form of stakeholder involvement. Potential options for stakeholder involvement for key performance indicator identification include the use of an elicitation framework, a factorial survey approach, or a Delphi study. CONCLUSIONS: Few articles were identified, highlighting a significant gap in evidence-based knowledge in this domain. All the included articles discussed the involvement of stakeholders in developing key performance indicators for digital health interventions, which were performed using various methodologies. The articles acknowledged a lack of literature related to key performance indicator development for digital health interventions. To allow comparability between key performance indicator initiatives and facilitate work in the field, further research would be beneficial to develop a common methodology for key performance indicators development for digital health interventions. SAGE Publications 2023-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9880566/ /pubmed/36714542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076231152160 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review Article
Brenner, Maria
Weir, Arielle
McCann, Margaret
Doyle, Carmel
Hughes, Mary
Moen, Anne
Ingvar, Martin
Nauwelaerts, Koen
Turk, Eva
McCabe, Catherine
Development of the key performance indicators for digital health interventions: A scoping review
title Development of the key performance indicators for digital health interventions: A scoping review
title_full Development of the key performance indicators for digital health interventions: A scoping review
title_fullStr Development of the key performance indicators for digital health interventions: A scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Development of the key performance indicators for digital health interventions: A scoping review
title_short Development of the key performance indicators for digital health interventions: A scoping review
title_sort development of the key performance indicators for digital health interventions: a scoping review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9880566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36714542
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076231152160
work_keys_str_mv AT brennermaria developmentofthekeyperformanceindicatorsfordigitalhealthinterventionsascopingreview
AT weirarielle developmentofthekeyperformanceindicatorsfordigitalhealthinterventionsascopingreview
AT mccannmargaret developmentofthekeyperformanceindicatorsfordigitalhealthinterventionsascopingreview
AT doylecarmel developmentofthekeyperformanceindicatorsfordigitalhealthinterventionsascopingreview
AT hughesmary developmentofthekeyperformanceindicatorsfordigitalhealthinterventionsascopingreview
AT moenanne developmentofthekeyperformanceindicatorsfordigitalhealthinterventionsascopingreview
AT ingvarmartin developmentofthekeyperformanceindicatorsfordigitalhealthinterventionsascopingreview
AT nauwelaertskoen developmentofthekeyperformanceindicatorsfordigitalhealthinterventionsascopingreview
AT turkeva developmentofthekeyperformanceindicatorsfordigitalhealthinterventionsascopingreview
AT mccabecatherine developmentofthekeyperformanceindicatorsfordigitalhealthinterventionsascopingreview