Cargando…
Understanding Financial Toxicity in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review
BACKGROUND: Cancer treatment often results in financial burdens for patients including healthcare costs as well as treatment-induced disability leading to “financial toxicity” (FT) and decreased quality of life. The purpose of this review is to describe FT related to head and neck cancer (HNC) treat...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9880590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36710886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11795549221147730 |
_version_ | 1784878948278075392 |
---|---|
author | Rosi-Schumacher, Mattie Patel, Shivam Phan, Chandat Goyal, Neerav |
author_facet | Rosi-Schumacher, Mattie Patel, Shivam Phan, Chandat Goyal, Neerav |
author_sort | Rosi-Schumacher, Mattie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cancer treatment often results in financial burdens for patients including healthcare costs as well as treatment-induced disability leading to “financial toxicity” (FT) and decreased quality of life. The purpose of this review is to describe FT related to head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment, including quantifications of direct and indirect costs and descriptions of measurement tools. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched to identify articles published before April 2022. Full-text published studies were included if they assessed direct or indirect costs of HNC treatment; studies were excluded if they did not focus on HNC or financial burden. The risk of bias was assessed, and the results of the studies were synthesized. RESULTS: Database searches yielded 530 unique studies, and 33 studies met the criteria for inclusion. Medical expenses for patients with HNC were higher than for patients with other cancers or controls in several studies. Major surgical procedures, neck dissection, free-flap reconstruction, and intensive care unit admission increased hospital costs. Trimodal therapy with surgery plus chemoradiation represented the most expensive treatment, and chemoradiation increased complication-related health care costs. In several studies, >50% of patients treated for HNC were disabled and did not return to work. One of the greatest contributors to the indirect cost of HNC treatment is the loss of lifetime wages. Patients with HNC are at risk for depression, anxiety, and social isolation, which are linked to a decreased quality of life and treatment non-adherence. The only tools used to assess FT in patients with HNC are the Comprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) and the Financial Index of Toxicity (FIT). CONCLUSION: Financial toxicity is highly prevalent among patients with HNC. Further research is needed to validate the assessment tools for quantifying FT in HNC patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9880590 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98805902023-01-28 Understanding Financial Toxicity in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review Rosi-Schumacher, Mattie Patel, Shivam Phan, Chandat Goyal, Neerav Clin Med Insights Oncol Head and neck cancers: Current concepts in the diagnosis, management, reconstruction, and rehabilitation BACKGROUND: Cancer treatment often results in financial burdens for patients including healthcare costs as well as treatment-induced disability leading to “financial toxicity” (FT) and decreased quality of life. The purpose of this review is to describe FT related to head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment, including quantifications of direct and indirect costs and descriptions of measurement tools. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched to identify articles published before April 2022. Full-text published studies were included if they assessed direct or indirect costs of HNC treatment; studies were excluded if they did not focus on HNC or financial burden. The risk of bias was assessed, and the results of the studies were synthesized. RESULTS: Database searches yielded 530 unique studies, and 33 studies met the criteria for inclusion. Medical expenses for patients with HNC were higher than for patients with other cancers or controls in several studies. Major surgical procedures, neck dissection, free-flap reconstruction, and intensive care unit admission increased hospital costs. Trimodal therapy with surgery plus chemoradiation represented the most expensive treatment, and chemoradiation increased complication-related health care costs. In several studies, >50% of patients treated for HNC were disabled and did not return to work. One of the greatest contributors to the indirect cost of HNC treatment is the loss of lifetime wages. Patients with HNC are at risk for depression, anxiety, and social isolation, which are linked to a decreased quality of life and treatment non-adherence. The only tools used to assess FT in patients with HNC are the Comprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) and the Financial Index of Toxicity (FIT). CONCLUSION: Financial toxicity is highly prevalent among patients with HNC. Further research is needed to validate the assessment tools for quantifying FT in HNC patients. SAGE Publications 2023-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9880590/ /pubmed/36710886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11795549221147730 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Head and neck cancers: Current concepts in the diagnosis, management, reconstruction, and rehabilitation Rosi-Schumacher, Mattie Patel, Shivam Phan, Chandat Goyal, Neerav Understanding Financial Toxicity in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review |
title | Understanding Financial Toxicity in Patients with Head and Neck
Cancer: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Understanding Financial Toxicity in Patients with Head and Neck
Cancer: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Understanding Financial Toxicity in Patients with Head and Neck
Cancer: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Understanding Financial Toxicity in Patients with Head and Neck
Cancer: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Understanding Financial Toxicity in Patients with Head and Neck
Cancer: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | understanding financial toxicity in patients with head and neck
cancer: a systematic review |
topic | Head and neck cancers: Current concepts in the diagnosis, management, reconstruction, and rehabilitation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9880590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36710886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11795549221147730 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rosischumachermattie understandingfinancialtoxicityinpatientswithheadandneckcancerasystematicreview AT patelshivam understandingfinancialtoxicityinpatientswithheadandneckcancerasystematicreview AT phanchandat understandingfinancialtoxicityinpatientswithheadandneckcancerasystematicreview AT goyalneerav understandingfinancialtoxicityinpatientswithheadandneckcancerasystematicreview |