Cargando…

Assessment of genetically modified maize GA21 × T25 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐DE‐2016‐137)

Genetically modified maize GA21 × T25 was developed by crossing to combine two single events: GA21 and T25. The GMO Panel previously assessed the two single maize events and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single maize events were identified that could lead to modification of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mullins, Ewen, Bresson, Jean‐Louis, Dalmay, Tamas, Dewhurst, Ian Crawford, Epstein, Michelle M, Firbank, Leslie George, Guerche, Philippe, Hejatko, Jan, Moreno, Francisco Javier, Naegeli, Hanspeter, Nogué, Fabien, Rostoks, Nils, Serrano, Jose Juan Sánchez, Savoini, Giovanni, Veromann, Eve, Veronesi, Fabio, Álvarez, Fernando, Ardizzone, Michele, De Sanctis, Giacomo, Devos, Yann, Federici, Silvia, Fernandez Dumont, Antonio, Gennaro, Andrea, Gómez Ruiz, José Ángel, Goumperis, Tilemachos, Kagkli, Dafni Maria, Lanzoni, Anna, Lenzi, Paolo, Camargo, Ana Martin, Neri, Franco Maria, Papadopoulou, Nikoletta, Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos, Raffaello, Tommaso, Streissl, Franz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9880721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36721864
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7729
_version_ 1784878962001838080
author Mullins, Ewen
Bresson, Jean‐Louis
Dalmay, Tamas
Dewhurst, Ian Crawford
Epstein, Michelle M
Firbank, Leslie George
Guerche, Philippe
Hejatko, Jan
Moreno, Francisco Javier
Naegeli, Hanspeter
Nogué, Fabien
Rostoks, Nils
Serrano, Jose Juan Sánchez
Savoini, Giovanni
Veromann, Eve
Veronesi, Fabio
Álvarez, Fernando
Ardizzone, Michele
De Sanctis, Giacomo
Devos, Yann
Federici, Silvia
Fernandez Dumont, Antonio
Gennaro, Andrea
Gómez Ruiz, José Ángel
Goumperis, Tilemachos
Kagkli, Dafni Maria
Lanzoni, Anna
Lenzi, Paolo
Camargo, Ana Martin
Neri, Franco Maria
Papadopoulou, Nikoletta
Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos
Raffaello, Tommaso
Streissl, Franz
author_facet Mullins, Ewen
Bresson, Jean‐Louis
Dalmay, Tamas
Dewhurst, Ian Crawford
Epstein, Michelle M
Firbank, Leslie George
Guerche, Philippe
Hejatko, Jan
Moreno, Francisco Javier
Naegeli, Hanspeter
Nogué, Fabien
Rostoks, Nils
Serrano, Jose Juan Sánchez
Savoini, Giovanni
Veromann, Eve
Veronesi, Fabio
Álvarez, Fernando
Ardizzone, Michele
De Sanctis, Giacomo
Devos, Yann
Federici, Silvia
Fernandez Dumont, Antonio
Gennaro, Andrea
Gómez Ruiz, José Ángel
Goumperis, Tilemachos
Kagkli, Dafni Maria
Lanzoni, Anna
Lenzi, Paolo
Camargo, Ana Martin
Neri, Franco Maria
Papadopoulou, Nikoletta
Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos
Raffaello, Tommaso
Streissl, Franz
collection PubMed
description Genetically modified maize GA21 × T25 was developed by crossing to combine two single events: GA21 and T25. The GMO Panel previously assessed the two single maize events and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single maize events were identified that could lead to modification of the original conclusions on their safety. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment indicate that the combination of the single maize events and of the newly expressed proteins in maize GA21 × T25 does not give rise to food and feed safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that maize GA21 × T25, as described in this application, is as safe as its conventional counterpart and the non‐GM reference varieties tested, and no post‐market monitoring of food and feed is considered necessary. In the case of accidental release of viable maize GA21 × T25 grains into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of maize GA21 × T25. Post‐market monitoring of food and feed is not considered necessary. The GMO Panel concludes that maize GA21 × T25 is as safe as its conventional counterpart and the non‐GM reference varieties tested, with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9880721
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98807212023-01-30 Assessment of genetically modified maize GA21 × T25 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐DE‐2016‐137) Mullins, Ewen Bresson, Jean‐Louis Dalmay, Tamas Dewhurst, Ian Crawford Epstein, Michelle M Firbank, Leslie George Guerche, Philippe Hejatko, Jan Moreno, Francisco Javier Naegeli, Hanspeter Nogué, Fabien Rostoks, Nils Serrano, Jose Juan Sánchez Savoini, Giovanni Veromann, Eve Veronesi, Fabio Álvarez, Fernando Ardizzone, Michele De Sanctis, Giacomo Devos, Yann Federici, Silvia Fernandez Dumont, Antonio Gennaro, Andrea Gómez Ruiz, José Ángel Goumperis, Tilemachos Kagkli, Dafni Maria Lanzoni, Anna Lenzi, Paolo Camargo, Ana Martin Neri, Franco Maria Papadopoulou, Nikoletta Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos Raffaello, Tommaso Streissl, Franz EFSA J Scientific Opinion Genetically modified maize GA21 × T25 was developed by crossing to combine two single events: GA21 and T25. The GMO Panel previously assessed the two single maize events and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single maize events were identified that could lead to modification of the original conclusions on their safety. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment indicate that the combination of the single maize events and of the newly expressed proteins in maize GA21 × T25 does not give rise to food and feed safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that maize GA21 × T25, as described in this application, is as safe as its conventional counterpart and the non‐GM reference varieties tested, and no post‐market monitoring of food and feed is considered necessary. In the case of accidental release of viable maize GA21 × T25 grains into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of maize GA21 × T25. Post‐market monitoring of food and feed is not considered necessary. The GMO Panel concludes that maize GA21 × T25 is as safe as its conventional counterpart and the non‐GM reference varieties tested, with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9880721/ /pubmed/36721864 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7729 Text en © 2023 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Mullins, Ewen
Bresson, Jean‐Louis
Dalmay, Tamas
Dewhurst, Ian Crawford
Epstein, Michelle M
Firbank, Leslie George
Guerche, Philippe
Hejatko, Jan
Moreno, Francisco Javier
Naegeli, Hanspeter
Nogué, Fabien
Rostoks, Nils
Serrano, Jose Juan Sánchez
Savoini, Giovanni
Veromann, Eve
Veronesi, Fabio
Álvarez, Fernando
Ardizzone, Michele
De Sanctis, Giacomo
Devos, Yann
Federici, Silvia
Fernandez Dumont, Antonio
Gennaro, Andrea
Gómez Ruiz, José Ángel
Goumperis, Tilemachos
Kagkli, Dafni Maria
Lanzoni, Anna
Lenzi, Paolo
Camargo, Ana Martin
Neri, Franco Maria
Papadopoulou, Nikoletta
Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos
Raffaello, Tommaso
Streissl, Franz
Assessment of genetically modified maize GA21 × T25 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐DE‐2016‐137)
title Assessment of genetically modified maize GA21 × T25 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐DE‐2016‐137)
title_full Assessment of genetically modified maize GA21 × T25 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐DE‐2016‐137)
title_fullStr Assessment of genetically modified maize GA21 × T25 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐DE‐2016‐137)
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of genetically modified maize GA21 × T25 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐DE‐2016‐137)
title_short Assessment of genetically modified maize GA21 × T25 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐DE‐2016‐137)
title_sort assessment of genetically modified maize ga21 × t25 for food and feed uses, under regulation (ec) no 1829/2003 (application efsa‐gmo‐de‐2016‐137)
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9880721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36721864
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7729
work_keys_str_mv AT assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21t25forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2016137
AT mullinsewen assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21t25forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2016137
AT bressonjeanlouis assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21t25forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2016137
AT dalmaytamas assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21t25forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2016137
AT dewhurstiancrawford assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21t25forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2016137
AT epsteinmichellem assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21t25forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2016137
AT firbanklesliegeorge assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21t25forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2016137
AT guerchephilippe assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21t25forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2016137
AT hejatkojan assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21t25forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2016137
AT morenofranciscojavier assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21t25forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2016137
AT naegelihanspeter assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21t25forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2016137
AT noguefabien assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21t25forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2016137
AT rostoksnils assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21t25forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2016137
AT serranojosejuansanchez assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21t25forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2016137
AT savoinigiovanni assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21t25forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2016137
AT veromanneve assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21t25forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2016137
AT veronesifabio assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21t25forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2016137
AT alvarezfernando assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21t25forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2016137
AT ardizzonemichele assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21t25forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2016137
AT desanctisgiacomo assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21t25forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2016137
AT devosyann assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21t25forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2016137
AT federicisilvia assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21t25forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2016137
AT fernandezdumontantonio assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21t25forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2016137
AT gennaroandrea assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21t25forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2016137
AT gomezruizjoseangel assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21t25forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2016137
AT goumperistilemachos assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21t25forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2016137
AT kagklidafnimaria assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21t25forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2016137
AT lanzonianna assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21t25forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2016137
AT lenzipaolo assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21t25forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2016137
AT camargoanamartin assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21t25forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2016137
AT nerifrancomaria assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21t25forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2016137
AT papadopoulounikoletta assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21t25forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2016137
AT paraskevopouloskonstantinos assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21t25forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2016137
AT raffaellotommaso assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21t25forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2016137
AT streisslfranz assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21t25forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2016137