Cargando…

Current practices in diagnosis of Hymenoptera venom allergy in Poland

INTRODUCTION: Hymenoptera venom allergy (HVA) is associated with a high risk of anaphylaxis. Effective treatment of HVA patients requires allergologists’ familiarity with the latest HVA recommendations. AIM: Evaluation of current practices in HVA diagnosis in Poland. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A survey q...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cichocka-Jarosz, Ewa, Brzyski, Piotr, Jedynak-Wąsowicz, Urszula, Nittner-Marszalska, Marita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9880773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36751544
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ada.2021.106200
_version_ 1784878967606476800
author Cichocka-Jarosz, Ewa
Brzyski, Piotr
Jedynak-Wąsowicz, Urszula
Nittner-Marszalska, Marita
author_facet Cichocka-Jarosz, Ewa
Brzyski, Piotr
Jedynak-Wąsowicz, Urszula
Nittner-Marszalska, Marita
author_sort Cichocka-Jarosz, Ewa
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Hymenoptera venom allergy (HVA) is associated with a high risk of anaphylaxis. Effective treatment of HVA patients requires allergologists’ familiarity with the latest HVA recommendations. AIM: Evaluation of current practices in HVA diagnosis in Poland. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A survey questionnaire was conducted in 32 HVA centres in Poland. RESULTS: The response rate was 97%. There were 1829 patients evaluated due to HVA in 2015. Sixty six percent (n = 21) of the centres used skin prick tests, out which 90% (n = 19) used 100 µg/ml of the venom extract as the highest concentration. All the centres performed intradermal tests (IDT) and serum specific IgE (sIgE), an initial diagnostic tool in 91% (n = 29). The highest venom concentration in IDT was 1 µg/ml in 75% (n = 24), 0.1 µg/ml in 16% (n = 5), 0.01 µg/ml in 3% (n = 1) and 10 µg/ml in 6% (n = 2). Baseline serum tryptase was assessed in 84% of the centres (n = 27), out of which 53% (n = 17) tested all their patients, whereas 31% (n = 10) checked only those with life-threatening reactions. In case of negative IDT/sIgE, 59% of the centres (n = 19) performed components evaluation, while 19% (n = 6) did the basophil activation test. In case of no identification of the culprit insect and sensitization to both venoms, VIT employed venom with higher sIgE. CONCLUSIONS: Most allergology centres in Poland follow HVA guidelines. We identified two inaccuracies in their HVA management including non-adequate venom concentration in IDT and a false belief in correspondence between sIgE concentration and severity of allergic reactions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9880773
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98807732023-02-06 Current practices in diagnosis of Hymenoptera venom allergy in Poland Cichocka-Jarosz, Ewa Brzyski, Piotr Jedynak-Wąsowicz, Urszula Nittner-Marszalska, Marita Postepy Dermatol Alergol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Hymenoptera venom allergy (HVA) is associated with a high risk of anaphylaxis. Effective treatment of HVA patients requires allergologists’ familiarity with the latest HVA recommendations. AIM: Evaluation of current practices in HVA diagnosis in Poland. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A survey questionnaire was conducted in 32 HVA centres in Poland. RESULTS: The response rate was 97%. There were 1829 patients evaluated due to HVA in 2015. Sixty six percent (n = 21) of the centres used skin prick tests, out which 90% (n = 19) used 100 µg/ml of the venom extract as the highest concentration. All the centres performed intradermal tests (IDT) and serum specific IgE (sIgE), an initial diagnostic tool in 91% (n = 29). The highest venom concentration in IDT was 1 µg/ml in 75% (n = 24), 0.1 µg/ml in 16% (n = 5), 0.01 µg/ml in 3% (n = 1) and 10 µg/ml in 6% (n = 2). Baseline serum tryptase was assessed in 84% of the centres (n = 27), out of which 53% (n = 17) tested all their patients, whereas 31% (n = 10) checked only those with life-threatening reactions. In case of negative IDT/sIgE, 59% of the centres (n = 19) performed components evaluation, while 19% (n = 6) did the basophil activation test. In case of no identification of the culprit insect and sensitization to both venoms, VIT employed venom with higher sIgE. CONCLUSIONS: Most allergology centres in Poland follow HVA guidelines. We identified two inaccuracies in their HVA management including non-adequate venom concentration in IDT and a false belief in correspondence between sIgE concentration and severity of allergic reactions. Termedia Publishing House 2021-05-22 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9880773/ /pubmed/36751544 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ada.2021.106200 Text en Copyright © 2022 Termedia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Original Paper
Cichocka-Jarosz, Ewa
Brzyski, Piotr
Jedynak-Wąsowicz, Urszula
Nittner-Marszalska, Marita
Current practices in diagnosis of Hymenoptera venom allergy in Poland
title Current practices in diagnosis of Hymenoptera venom allergy in Poland
title_full Current practices in diagnosis of Hymenoptera venom allergy in Poland
title_fullStr Current practices in diagnosis of Hymenoptera venom allergy in Poland
title_full_unstemmed Current practices in diagnosis of Hymenoptera venom allergy in Poland
title_short Current practices in diagnosis of Hymenoptera venom allergy in Poland
title_sort current practices in diagnosis of hymenoptera venom allergy in poland
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9880773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36751544
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ada.2021.106200
work_keys_str_mv AT cichockajaroszewa currentpracticesindiagnosisofhymenopteravenomallergyinpoland
AT brzyskipiotr currentpracticesindiagnosisofhymenopteravenomallergyinpoland
AT jedynakwasowiczurszula currentpracticesindiagnosisofhymenopteravenomallergyinpoland
AT nittnermarszalskamarita currentpracticesindiagnosisofhymenopteravenomallergyinpoland
AT currentpracticesindiagnosisofhymenopteravenomallergyinpoland