Cargando…
Clinical profile and outcomes of semi-permanent pacing in a tertiary care institute in southern India
BACKGROUND: Semi-permanent pacing (SPP) includes the placement of a permanent lead through the internal jugular vein and connection to a pulse generator on the skin outside the venous access site. AIM: To evaluate the clinical profile and outcomes of semi-permanent pacing in a tertiary care institut...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9880884/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36372273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2022.11.001 |
_version_ | 1784878990633205760 |
---|---|
author | Raghuram, Karthik Nair, Krishna Kumar Mohanan Namboodiri, Narayanan Abhilash, Sreevilasam Pushpangadhan Valaparambil, Ajit Kumar |
author_facet | Raghuram, Karthik Nair, Krishna Kumar Mohanan Namboodiri, Narayanan Abhilash, Sreevilasam Pushpangadhan Valaparambil, Ajit Kumar |
author_sort | Raghuram, Karthik |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Semi-permanent pacing (SPP) includes the placement of a permanent lead through the internal jugular vein and connection to a pulse generator on the skin outside the venous access site. AIM: To evaluate the clinical profile and outcomes of semi-permanent pacing in a tertiary care institute in Southern India. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study. All patients admitted and requiring management with semi-permanent pacing from January 2017 to June 2020 were included. RESULTS: From January 2017 to June 2020, 20 patients underwent semi-permanent pacing (SPP) with a median age of 54 (21–74) years. Males comprised a majority of the patients (55%). Hypertension was noted in 50% of patients and 30% were diabetic. The right internal jugular vein was the most common access in 95% of patients. The most common indication for semi-permanent pacing was pocket site infection in 30% of patients. There were no procedural complications. The median duration on SPP was 7 (5–14) days and the median duration of hospital stay was 13 (8–21) days. Permanent pacemaker implantation was done in 55% of patients. Mortality in our study group was 15% with 10% dying due to cardiogenic shock (post resuscitated cardiac arrest) and 5% dying due to non-cardiac cause (Epidural hematoma). CONCLUSION: In our study, semi-permanent pacing was noted to be a safe procedure and was more commonly indicated in emergent conditions with complete heart block secondary to underlying reversible causes and in the management of pocket site infection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9880884 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98808842023-01-28 Clinical profile and outcomes of semi-permanent pacing in a tertiary care institute in southern India Raghuram, Karthik Nair, Krishna Kumar Mohanan Namboodiri, Narayanan Abhilash, Sreevilasam Pushpangadhan Valaparambil, Ajit Kumar Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Semi-permanent pacing (SPP) includes the placement of a permanent lead through the internal jugular vein and connection to a pulse generator on the skin outside the venous access site. AIM: To evaluate the clinical profile and outcomes of semi-permanent pacing in a tertiary care institute in Southern India. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study. All patients admitted and requiring management with semi-permanent pacing from January 2017 to June 2020 were included. RESULTS: From January 2017 to June 2020, 20 patients underwent semi-permanent pacing (SPP) with a median age of 54 (21–74) years. Males comprised a majority of the patients (55%). Hypertension was noted in 50% of patients and 30% were diabetic. The right internal jugular vein was the most common access in 95% of patients. The most common indication for semi-permanent pacing was pocket site infection in 30% of patients. There were no procedural complications. The median duration on SPP was 7 (5–14) days and the median duration of hospital stay was 13 (8–21) days. Permanent pacemaker implantation was done in 55% of patients. Mortality in our study group was 15% with 10% dying due to cardiogenic shock (post resuscitated cardiac arrest) and 5% dying due to non-cardiac cause (Epidural hematoma). CONCLUSION: In our study, semi-permanent pacing was noted to be a safe procedure and was more commonly indicated in emergent conditions with complete heart block secondary to underlying reversible causes and in the management of pocket site infection. Elsevier 2022-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9880884/ /pubmed/36372273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2022.11.001 Text en © 2022 Indian Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Raghuram, Karthik Nair, Krishna Kumar Mohanan Namboodiri, Narayanan Abhilash, Sreevilasam Pushpangadhan Valaparambil, Ajit Kumar Clinical profile and outcomes of semi-permanent pacing in a tertiary care institute in southern India |
title | Clinical profile and outcomes of semi-permanent pacing in a tertiary care institute in southern India |
title_full | Clinical profile and outcomes of semi-permanent pacing in a tertiary care institute in southern India |
title_fullStr | Clinical profile and outcomes of semi-permanent pacing in a tertiary care institute in southern India |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical profile and outcomes of semi-permanent pacing in a tertiary care institute in southern India |
title_short | Clinical profile and outcomes of semi-permanent pacing in a tertiary care institute in southern India |
title_sort | clinical profile and outcomes of semi-permanent pacing in a tertiary care institute in southern india |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9880884/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36372273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2022.11.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT raghuramkarthik clinicalprofileandoutcomesofsemipermanentpacinginatertiarycareinstituteinsouthernindia AT nairkrishnakumarmohanan clinicalprofileandoutcomesofsemipermanentpacinginatertiarycareinstituteinsouthernindia AT namboodirinarayanan clinicalprofileandoutcomesofsemipermanentpacinginatertiarycareinstituteinsouthernindia AT abhilashsreevilasampushpangadhan clinicalprofileandoutcomesofsemipermanentpacinginatertiarycareinstituteinsouthernindia AT valaparambilajitkumar clinicalprofileandoutcomesofsemipermanentpacinginatertiarycareinstituteinsouthernindia |