Cargando…

Clinical profile and outcomes of semi-permanent pacing in a tertiary care institute in southern India

BACKGROUND: Semi-permanent pacing (SPP) includes the placement of a permanent lead through the internal jugular vein and connection to a pulse generator on the skin outside the venous access site. AIM: To evaluate the clinical profile and outcomes of semi-permanent pacing in a tertiary care institut...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raghuram, Karthik, Nair, Krishna Kumar Mohanan, Namboodiri, Narayanan, Abhilash, Sreevilasam Pushpangadhan, Valaparambil, Ajit Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9880884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36372273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2022.11.001
_version_ 1784878990633205760
author Raghuram, Karthik
Nair, Krishna Kumar Mohanan
Namboodiri, Narayanan
Abhilash, Sreevilasam Pushpangadhan
Valaparambil, Ajit Kumar
author_facet Raghuram, Karthik
Nair, Krishna Kumar Mohanan
Namboodiri, Narayanan
Abhilash, Sreevilasam Pushpangadhan
Valaparambil, Ajit Kumar
author_sort Raghuram, Karthik
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Semi-permanent pacing (SPP) includes the placement of a permanent lead through the internal jugular vein and connection to a pulse generator on the skin outside the venous access site. AIM: To evaluate the clinical profile and outcomes of semi-permanent pacing in a tertiary care institute in Southern India. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study. All patients admitted and requiring management with semi-permanent pacing from January 2017 to June 2020 were included. RESULTS: From January 2017 to June 2020, 20 patients underwent semi-permanent pacing (SPP) with a median age of 54 (21–74) years. Males comprised a majority of the patients (55%). Hypertension was noted in 50% of patients and 30% were diabetic. The right internal jugular vein was the most common access in 95% of patients. The most common indication for semi-permanent pacing was pocket site infection in 30% of patients. There were no procedural complications. The median duration on SPP was 7 (5–14) days and the median duration of hospital stay was 13 (8–21) days. Permanent pacemaker implantation was done in 55% of patients. Mortality in our study group was 15% with 10% dying due to cardiogenic shock (post resuscitated cardiac arrest) and 5% dying due to non-cardiac cause (Epidural hematoma). CONCLUSION: In our study, semi-permanent pacing was noted to be a safe procedure and was more commonly indicated in emergent conditions with complete heart block secondary to underlying reversible causes and in the management of pocket site infection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9880884
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98808842023-01-28 Clinical profile and outcomes of semi-permanent pacing in a tertiary care institute in southern India Raghuram, Karthik Nair, Krishna Kumar Mohanan Namboodiri, Narayanan Abhilash, Sreevilasam Pushpangadhan Valaparambil, Ajit Kumar Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Semi-permanent pacing (SPP) includes the placement of a permanent lead through the internal jugular vein and connection to a pulse generator on the skin outside the venous access site. AIM: To evaluate the clinical profile and outcomes of semi-permanent pacing in a tertiary care institute in Southern India. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study. All patients admitted and requiring management with semi-permanent pacing from January 2017 to June 2020 were included. RESULTS: From January 2017 to June 2020, 20 patients underwent semi-permanent pacing (SPP) with a median age of 54 (21–74) years. Males comprised a majority of the patients (55%). Hypertension was noted in 50% of patients and 30% were diabetic. The right internal jugular vein was the most common access in 95% of patients. The most common indication for semi-permanent pacing was pocket site infection in 30% of patients. There were no procedural complications. The median duration on SPP was 7 (5–14) days and the median duration of hospital stay was 13 (8–21) days. Permanent pacemaker implantation was done in 55% of patients. Mortality in our study group was 15% with 10% dying due to cardiogenic shock (post resuscitated cardiac arrest) and 5% dying due to non-cardiac cause (Epidural hematoma). CONCLUSION: In our study, semi-permanent pacing was noted to be a safe procedure and was more commonly indicated in emergent conditions with complete heart block secondary to underlying reversible causes and in the management of pocket site infection. Elsevier 2022-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9880884/ /pubmed/36372273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2022.11.001 Text en © 2022 Indian Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Raghuram, Karthik
Nair, Krishna Kumar Mohanan
Namboodiri, Narayanan
Abhilash, Sreevilasam Pushpangadhan
Valaparambil, Ajit Kumar
Clinical profile and outcomes of semi-permanent pacing in a tertiary care institute in southern India
title Clinical profile and outcomes of semi-permanent pacing in a tertiary care institute in southern India
title_full Clinical profile and outcomes of semi-permanent pacing in a tertiary care institute in southern India
title_fullStr Clinical profile and outcomes of semi-permanent pacing in a tertiary care institute in southern India
title_full_unstemmed Clinical profile and outcomes of semi-permanent pacing in a tertiary care institute in southern India
title_short Clinical profile and outcomes of semi-permanent pacing in a tertiary care institute in southern India
title_sort clinical profile and outcomes of semi-permanent pacing in a tertiary care institute in southern india
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9880884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36372273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2022.11.001
work_keys_str_mv AT raghuramkarthik clinicalprofileandoutcomesofsemipermanentpacinginatertiarycareinstituteinsouthernindia
AT nairkrishnakumarmohanan clinicalprofileandoutcomesofsemipermanentpacinginatertiarycareinstituteinsouthernindia
AT namboodirinarayanan clinicalprofileandoutcomesofsemipermanentpacinginatertiarycareinstituteinsouthernindia
AT abhilashsreevilasampushpangadhan clinicalprofileandoutcomesofsemipermanentpacinginatertiarycareinstituteinsouthernindia
AT valaparambilajitkumar clinicalprofileandoutcomesofsemipermanentpacinginatertiarycareinstituteinsouthernindia