Cargando…

Radiation biology workforce in the United States

In recent decades, the principal goals of participants in the field of radiation biologists have included defining dose thresholds for cancer and non‐cancer endpoints to be used by regulators, clinicians and industry, as well as informing on best practice radiation utilization and protection applica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Williams, Jacqueline P., Anscher, Mitchell S., Vazquez, Marcelo, Kronenberg, Amy, Willey, Jeffrey S., Lawrence, Theodore, Woloschak, Gayle E., Marples, Brian, Wong, Rosemary, Howell, Roger W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9880969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36705246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13743
_version_ 1784879011362504704
author Williams, Jacqueline P.
Anscher, Mitchell S.
Vazquez, Marcelo
Kronenberg, Amy
Willey, Jeffrey S.
Lawrence, Theodore
Woloschak, Gayle E.
Marples, Brian
Wong, Rosemary
Howell, Roger W.
author_facet Williams, Jacqueline P.
Anscher, Mitchell S.
Vazquez, Marcelo
Kronenberg, Amy
Willey, Jeffrey S.
Lawrence, Theodore
Woloschak, Gayle E.
Marples, Brian
Wong, Rosemary
Howell, Roger W.
author_sort Williams, Jacqueline P.
collection PubMed
description In recent decades, the principal goals of participants in the field of radiation biologists have included defining dose thresholds for cancer and non‐cancer endpoints to be used by regulators, clinicians and industry, as well as informing on best practice radiation utilization and protection applications. Importantly, much of this work has required an intimate relationship between “bench” radiation biology scientists and their target audiences (such as physicists, medical practitioners and epidemiologists) in order to ensure that the requisite gaps in knowledge are adequately addressed. However, despite the growing risk for public exposure to higher‐than‐background levels of radiation, e.g. from long‐distance travel, the increasing use of ionizing radiation during medical procedures, the threat from geopolitical instability, and so forth, there has been a dramatic decline in the number of qualified radiation biologists in the U.S. Contributing factors are thought to include the loss of applicable training programs, loss of jobs, and declining opportunities for advancement. This report was undertaken in order to begin addressing this situation since inaction may threaten the viability of radiation biology as a scientific discipline.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9880969
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98809692023-01-30 Radiation biology workforce in the United States Williams, Jacqueline P. Anscher, Mitchell S. Vazquez, Marcelo Kronenberg, Amy Willey, Jeffrey S. Lawrence, Theodore Woloschak, Gayle E. Marples, Brian Wong, Rosemary Howell, Roger W. J Appl Clin Med Phys Review Articles In recent decades, the principal goals of participants in the field of radiation biologists have included defining dose thresholds for cancer and non‐cancer endpoints to be used by regulators, clinicians and industry, as well as informing on best practice radiation utilization and protection applications. Importantly, much of this work has required an intimate relationship between “bench” radiation biology scientists and their target audiences (such as physicists, medical practitioners and epidemiologists) in order to ensure that the requisite gaps in knowledge are adequately addressed. However, despite the growing risk for public exposure to higher‐than‐background levels of radiation, e.g. from long‐distance travel, the increasing use of ionizing radiation during medical procedures, the threat from geopolitical instability, and so forth, there has been a dramatic decline in the number of qualified radiation biologists in the U.S. Contributing factors are thought to include the loss of applicable training programs, loss of jobs, and declining opportunities for advancement. This report was undertaken in order to begin addressing this situation since inaction may threaten the viability of radiation biology as a scientific discipline. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9880969/ /pubmed/36705246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13743 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Williams, Jacqueline P.
Anscher, Mitchell S.
Vazquez, Marcelo
Kronenberg, Amy
Willey, Jeffrey S.
Lawrence, Theodore
Woloschak, Gayle E.
Marples, Brian
Wong, Rosemary
Howell, Roger W.
Radiation biology workforce in the United States
title Radiation biology workforce in the United States
title_full Radiation biology workforce in the United States
title_fullStr Radiation biology workforce in the United States
title_full_unstemmed Radiation biology workforce in the United States
title_short Radiation biology workforce in the United States
title_sort radiation biology workforce in the united states
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9880969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36705246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13743
work_keys_str_mv AT williamsjacquelinep radiationbiologyworkforceintheunitedstates
AT anschermitchells radiationbiologyworkforceintheunitedstates
AT vazquezmarcelo radiationbiologyworkforceintheunitedstates
AT kronenbergamy radiationbiologyworkforceintheunitedstates
AT willeyjeffreys radiationbiologyworkforceintheunitedstates
AT lawrencetheodore radiationbiologyworkforceintheunitedstates
AT woloschakgaylee radiationbiologyworkforceintheunitedstates
AT marplesbrian radiationbiologyworkforceintheunitedstates
AT wongrosemary radiationbiologyworkforceintheunitedstates
AT howellrogerw radiationbiologyworkforceintheunitedstates