Cargando…
Radiation biology workforce in the United States
In recent decades, the principal goals of participants in the field of radiation biologists have included defining dose thresholds for cancer and non‐cancer endpoints to be used by regulators, clinicians and industry, as well as informing on best practice radiation utilization and protection applica...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9880969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36705246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13743 |
_version_ | 1784879011362504704 |
---|---|
author | Williams, Jacqueline P. Anscher, Mitchell S. Vazquez, Marcelo Kronenberg, Amy Willey, Jeffrey S. Lawrence, Theodore Woloschak, Gayle E. Marples, Brian Wong, Rosemary Howell, Roger W. |
author_facet | Williams, Jacqueline P. Anscher, Mitchell S. Vazquez, Marcelo Kronenberg, Amy Willey, Jeffrey S. Lawrence, Theodore Woloschak, Gayle E. Marples, Brian Wong, Rosemary Howell, Roger W. |
author_sort | Williams, Jacqueline P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In recent decades, the principal goals of participants in the field of radiation biologists have included defining dose thresholds for cancer and non‐cancer endpoints to be used by regulators, clinicians and industry, as well as informing on best practice radiation utilization and protection applications. Importantly, much of this work has required an intimate relationship between “bench” radiation biology scientists and their target audiences (such as physicists, medical practitioners and epidemiologists) in order to ensure that the requisite gaps in knowledge are adequately addressed. However, despite the growing risk for public exposure to higher‐than‐background levels of radiation, e.g. from long‐distance travel, the increasing use of ionizing radiation during medical procedures, the threat from geopolitical instability, and so forth, there has been a dramatic decline in the number of qualified radiation biologists in the U.S. Contributing factors are thought to include the loss of applicable training programs, loss of jobs, and declining opportunities for advancement. This report was undertaken in order to begin addressing this situation since inaction may threaten the viability of radiation biology as a scientific discipline. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9880969 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98809692023-01-30 Radiation biology workforce in the United States Williams, Jacqueline P. Anscher, Mitchell S. Vazquez, Marcelo Kronenberg, Amy Willey, Jeffrey S. Lawrence, Theodore Woloschak, Gayle E. Marples, Brian Wong, Rosemary Howell, Roger W. J Appl Clin Med Phys Review Articles In recent decades, the principal goals of participants in the field of radiation biologists have included defining dose thresholds for cancer and non‐cancer endpoints to be used by regulators, clinicians and industry, as well as informing on best practice radiation utilization and protection applications. Importantly, much of this work has required an intimate relationship between “bench” radiation biology scientists and their target audiences (such as physicists, medical practitioners and epidemiologists) in order to ensure that the requisite gaps in knowledge are adequately addressed. However, despite the growing risk for public exposure to higher‐than‐background levels of radiation, e.g. from long‐distance travel, the increasing use of ionizing radiation during medical procedures, the threat from geopolitical instability, and so forth, there has been a dramatic decline in the number of qualified radiation biologists in the U.S. Contributing factors are thought to include the loss of applicable training programs, loss of jobs, and declining opportunities for advancement. This report was undertaken in order to begin addressing this situation since inaction may threaten the viability of radiation biology as a scientific discipline. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9880969/ /pubmed/36705246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13743 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Williams, Jacqueline P. Anscher, Mitchell S. Vazquez, Marcelo Kronenberg, Amy Willey, Jeffrey S. Lawrence, Theodore Woloschak, Gayle E. Marples, Brian Wong, Rosemary Howell, Roger W. Radiation biology workforce in the United States |
title | Radiation biology workforce in the United States |
title_full | Radiation biology workforce in the United States |
title_fullStr | Radiation biology workforce in the United States |
title_full_unstemmed | Radiation biology workforce in the United States |
title_short | Radiation biology workforce in the United States |
title_sort | radiation biology workforce in the united states |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9880969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36705246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13743 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT williamsjacquelinep radiationbiologyworkforceintheunitedstates AT anschermitchells radiationbiologyworkforceintheunitedstates AT vazquezmarcelo radiationbiologyworkforceintheunitedstates AT kronenbergamy radiationbiologyworkforceintheunitedstates AT willeyjeffreys radiationbiologyworkforceintheunitedstates AT lawrencetheodore radiationbiologyworkforceintheunitedstates AT woloschakgaylee radiationbiologyworkforceintheunitedstates AT marplesbrian radiationbiologyworkforceintheunitedstates AT wongrosemary radiationbiologyworkforceintheunitedstates AT howellrogerw radiationbiologyworkforceintheunitedstates |