Cargando…
Association of SARS-CoV-2 viral load distributions with individual demographics and suspected variant type: results from the Liverpool community testing pilot, England, 6 November 2020 to 8 September 2021
BACKGROUND: The PCR quantification cycle (C(q)) is a proxy measure of the viral load of a SARS-CoV-2-infected individual. AIM: To investigate if C(q) values vary according to different population characteristics, in particular demographic ones, and within the COVID-19 pandemic context, notably the S...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9881177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36700865 http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.4.2200129 |
_version_ | 1784879058737168384 |
---|---|
author | Hughes, David M Cheyne, Christopher P Ashton, Matthew Coffey, Emer Crozier, Alex Semple, Malcolm G Buchan, Iain García-Fiñana, Marta |
author_facet | Hughes, David M Cheyne, Christopher P Ashton, Matthew Coffey, Emer Crozier, Alex Semple, Malcolm G Buchan, Iain García-Fiñana, Marta |
author_sort | Hughes, David M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The PCR quantification cycle (C(q)) is a proxy measure of the viral load of a SARS-CoV-2-infected individual. AIM: To investigate if C(q) values vary according to different population characteristics, in particular demographic ones, and within the COVID-19 pandemic context, notably the SARS-CoV-2 type/variant individuals get infected with. METHODS: We considered all positive PCR results from Cheshire and Merseyside, England, between 6 November 2020 and 8 September 2021. C(q) distributions were inspected with Kernel density estimates. Multivariable quantile regression models assessed associations between people’s features and C(q). RESULTS: We report C(q) values for 188,821 SARS-CoV-2 positive individuals. Median C(q)s increased with decreasing age for suspected wild-type virus and Alpha variant infections, but less so, if not, for Delta. For example, compared to 30–39-year-olds (median age group), 5–11-year-olds exhibited 1.8 (95% CI: 1.5 to 2.1), 2.2 (95% CI: 1.8 to 2.6) and 0.8 (95% CI: 0.6 to 0.9) higher median C(q)s for suspected wild-type, Alpha and Delta positives, respectively, in multivariable analysis. 12–18-year-olds also had higher C(q)s for wild-type and Alpha positives, however, not for Delta. Overall, in univariable analysis, suspected Delta positives reported 2.8 lower median C(q)s than wild-type positives (95% CI: 2.7 to 2.8; p < 0.001). Suspected Alpha positives had 1.5 (95% CI: 1.4 to 1.5; p < 0.001) lower median C(q)s than wild type. CONCLUSIONS: Wild-type- or Alpha-infected school-aged children (5–11-year-olds) might transmit less than adults (> 18 years old), but have greater mixing exposures. Smaller differences in viral loads with age occurred in suspected Delta infections. Suspected-Alpha- or Delta-infections involved higher viral loads than wild type, suggesting increased transmission risk. COVID-19 control strategies should consider age and dominant variant. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9881177 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98811772023-02-08 Association of SARS-CoV-2 viral load distributions with individual demographics and suspected variant type: results from the Liverpool community testing pilot, England, 6 November 2020 to 8 September 2021 Hughes, David M Cheyne, Christopher P Ashton, Matthew Coffey, Emer Crozier, Alex Semple, Malcolm G Buchan, Iain García-Fiñana, Marta Euro Surveill Research BACKGROUND: The PCR quantification cycle (C(q)) is a proxy measure of the viral load of a SARS-CoV-2-infected individual. AIM: To investigate if C(q) values vary according to different population characteristics, in particular demographic ones, and within the COVID-19 pandemic context, notably the SARS-CoV-2 type/variant individuals get infected with. METHODS: We considered all positive PCR results from Cheshire and Merseyside, England, between 6 November 2020 and 8 September 2021. C(q) distributions were inspected with Kernel density estimates. Multivariable quantile regression models assessed associations between people’s features and C(q). RESULTS: We report C(q) values for 188,821 SARS-CoV-2 positive individuals. Median C(q)s increased with decreasing age for suspected wild-type virus and Alpha variant infections, but less so, if not, for Delta. For example, compared to 30–39-year-olds (median age group), 5–11-year-olds exhibited 1.8 (95% CI: 1.5 to 2.1), 2.2 (95% CI: 1.8 to 2.6) and 0.8 (95% CI: 0.6 to 0.9) higher median C(q)s for suspected wild-type, Alpha and Delta positives, respectively, in multivariable analysis. 12–18-year-olds also had higher C(q)s for wild-type and Alpha positives, however, not for Delta. Overall, in univariable analysis, suspected Delta positives reported 2.8 lower median C(q)s than wild-type positives (95% CI: 2.7 to 2.8; p < 0.001). Suspected Alpha positives had 1.5 (95% CI: 1.4 to 1.5; p < 0.001) lower median C(q)s than wild type. CONCLUSIONS: Wild-type- or Alpha-infected school-aged children (5–11-year-olds) might transmit less than adults (> 18 years old), but have greater mixing exposures. Smaller differences in viral loads with age occurred in suspected Delta infections. Suspected-Alpha- or Delta-infections involved higher viral loads than wild type, suggesting increased transmission risk. COVID-19 control strategies should consider age and dominant variant. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) 2023-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9881177/ /pubmed/36700865 http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.4.2200129 Text en This article is copyright of the authors or their affiliated institutions, 2023. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) Licence. You may share and adapt the material, but must give appropriate credit to the source, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Hughes, David M Cheyne, Christopher P Ashton, Matthew Coffey, Emer Crozier, Alex Semple, Malcolm G Buchan, Iain García-Fiñana, Marta Association of SARS-CoV-2 viral load distributions with individual demographics and suspected variant type: results from the Liverpool community testing pilot, England, 6 November 2020 to 8 September 2021 |
title | Association of SARS-CoV-2 viral load distributions with individual demographics and suspected variant type: results from the Liverpool community testing pilot, England, 6 November 2020 to 8 September 2021 |
title_full | Association of SARS-CoV-2 viral load distributions with individual demographics and suspected variant type: results from the Liverpool community testing pilot, England, 6 November 2020 to 8 September 2021 |
title_fullStr | Association of SARS-CoV-2 viral load distributions with individual demographics and suspected variant type: results from the Liverpool community testing pilot, England, 6 November 2020 to 8 September 2021 |
title_full_unstemmed | Association of SARS-CoV-2 viral load distributions with individual demographics and suspected variant type: results from the Liverpool community testing pilot, England, 6 November 2020 to 8 September 2021 |
title_short | Association of SARS-CoV-2 viral load distributions with individual demographics and suspected variant type: results from the Liverpool community testing pilot, England, 6 November 2020 to 8 September 2021 |
title_sort | association of sars-cov-2 viral load distributions with individual demographics and suspected variant type: results from the liverpool community testing pilot, england, 6 november 2020 to 8 september 2021 |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9881177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36700865 http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.4.2200129 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hughesdavidm associationofsarscov2viralloaddistributionswithindividualdemographicsandsuspectedvarianttyperesultsfromtheliverpoolcommunitytestingpilotengland6november2020to8september2021 AT cheynechristopherp associationofsarscov2viralloaddistributionswithindividualdemographicsandsuspectedvarianttyperesultsfromtheliverpoolcommunitytestingpilotengland6november2020to8september2021 AT ashtonmatthew associationofsarscov2viralloaddistributionswithindividualdemographicsandsuspectedvarianttyperesultsfromtheliverpoolcommunitytestingpilotengland6november2020to8september2021 AT coffeyemer associationofsarscov2viralloaddistributionswithindividualdemographicsandsuspectedvarianttyperesultsfromtheliverpoolcommunitytestingpilotengland6november2020to8september2021 AT crozieralex associationofsarscov2viralloaddistributionswithindividualdemographicsandsuspectedvarianttyperesultsfromtheliverpoolcommunitytestingpilotengland6november2020to8september2021 AT semplemalcolmg associationofsarscov2viralloaddistributionswithindividualdemographicsandsuspectedvarianttyperesultsfromtheliverpoolcommunitytestingpilotengland6november2020to8september2021 AT buchaniain associationofsarscov2viralloaddistributionswithindividualdemographicsandsuspectedvarianttyperesultsfromtheliverpoolcommunitytestingpilotengland6november2020to8september2021 AT garciafinanamarta associationofsarscov2viralloaddistributionswithindividualdemographicsandsuspectedvarianttyperesultsfromtheliverpoolcommunitytestingpilotengland6november2020to8september2021 |