Cargando…

Association of SARS-CoV-2 viral load distributions with individual demographics and suspected variant type: results from the Liverpool community testing pilot, England, 6 November 2020 to 8 September 2021

BACKGROUND: The PCR quantification cycle (C(q)) is a proxy measure of the viral load of a SARS-CoV-2-infected individual. AIM: To investigate if C(q) values vary according to different population characteristics, in particular demographic ones, and within the COVID-19 pandemic context, notably the S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hughes, David M, Cheyne, Christopher P, Ashton, Matthew, Coffey, Emer, Crozier, Alex, Semple, Malcolm G, Buchan, Iain, García-Fiñana, Marta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9881177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36700865
http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.4.2200129
_version_ 1784879058737168384
author Hughes, David M
Cheyne, Christopher P
Ashton, Matthew
Coffey, Emer
Crozier, Alex
Semple, Malcolm G
Buchan, Iain
García-Fiñana, Marta
author_facet Hughes, David M
Cheyne, Christopher P
Ashton, Matthew
Coffey, Emer
Crozier, Alex
Semple, Malcolm G
Buchan, Iain
García-Fiñana, Marta
author_sort Hughes, David M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The PCR quantification cycle (C(q)) is a proxy measure of the viral load of a SARS-CoV-2-infected individual. AIM: To investigate if C(q) values vary according to different population characteristics, in particular demographic ones, and within the COVID-19 pandemic context, notably the SARS-CoV-2 type/variant individuals get infected with. METHODS: We considered all positive PCR results from Cheshire and Merseyside, England, between 6 November 2020 and 8 September 2021. C(q) distributions were inspected with Kernel density estimates. Multivariable quantile regression models assessed associations between people’s features and C(q). RESULTS: We report C(q) values for 188,821 SARS-CoV-2 positive individuals. Median C(q)s increased with decreasing age for suspected wild-type virus and Alpha variant infections, but less so, if not, for Delta. For example, compared to 30–39-year-olds (median age group), 5–11-year-olds exhibited 1.8 (95% CI: 1.5 to 2.1), 2.2 (95% CI: 1.8 to 2.6) and 0.8 (95% CI: 0.6 to 0.9) higher median C(q)s for suspected wild-type, Alpha and Delta positives, respectively, in multivariable analysis. 12–18-year-olds also had higher C(q)s for wild-type and Alpha positives, however, not for Delta. Overall, in univariable analysis, suspected Delta positives reported 2.8 lower median C(q)s than wild-type positives (95% CI: 2.7 to 2.8; p < 0.001). Suspected Alpha positives had 1.5 (95% CI: 1.4 to 1.5; p < 0.001) lower median C(q)s than wild type. CONCLUSIONS: Wild-type- or Alpha-infected school-aged children (5–11-year-olds) might transmit less than adults (> 18 years old), but have greater mixing exposures. Smaller differences in viral loads with age occurred in suspected Delta infections. Suspected-Alpha- or Delta-infections involved higher viral loads than wild type, suggesting increased transmission risk. COVID-19 control strategies should consider age and dominant variant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9881177
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98811772023-02-08 Association of SARS-CoV-2 viral load distributions with individual demographics and suspected variant type: results from the Liverpool community testing pilot, England, 6 November 2020 to 8 September 2021 Hughes, David M Cheyne, Christopher P Ashton, Matthew Coffey, Emer Crozier, Alex Semple, Malcolm G Buchan, Iain García-Fiñana, Marta Euro Surveill Research BACKGROUND: The PCR quantification cycle (C(q)) is a proxy measure of the viral load of a SARS-CoV-2-infected individual. AIM: To investigate if C(q) values vary according to different population characteristics, in particular demographic ones, and within the COVID-19 pandemic context, notably the SARS-CoV-2 type/variant individuals get infected with. METHODS: We considered all positive PCR results from Cheshire and Merseyside, England, between 6 November 2020 and 8 September 2021. C(q) distributions were inspected with Kernel density estimates. Multivariable quantile regression models assessed associations between people’s features and C(q). RESULTS: We report C(q) values for 188,821 SARS-CoV-2 positive individuals. Median C(q)s increased with decreasing age for suspected wild-type virus and Alpha variant infections, but less so, if not, for Delta. For example, compared to 30–39-year-olds (median age group), 5–11-year-olds exhibited 1.8 (95% CI: 1.5 to 2.1), 2.2 (95% CI: 1.8 to 2.6) and 0.8 (95% CI: 0.6 to 0.9) higher median C(q)s for suspected wild-type, Alpha and Delta positives, respectively, in multivariable analysis. 12–18-year-olds also had higher C(q)s for wild-type and Alpha positives, however, not for Delta. Overall, in univariable analysis, suspected Delta positives reported 2.8 lower median C(q)s than wild-type positives (95% CI: 2.7 to 2.8; p < 0.001). Suspected Alpha positives had 1.5 (95% CI: 1.4 to 1.5; p < 0.001) lower median C(q)s than wild type. CONCLUSIONS: Wild-type- or Alpha-infected school-aged children (5–11-year-olds) might transmit less than adults (> 18 years old), but have greater mixing exposures. Smaller differences in viral loads with age occurred in suspected Delta infections. Suspected-Alpha- or Delta-infections involved higher viral loads than wild type, suggesting increased transmission risk. COVID-19 control strategies should consider age and dominant variant. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) 2023-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9881177/ /pubmed/36700865 http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.4.2200129 Text en This article is copyright of the authors or their affiliated institutions, 2023. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) Licence. You may share and adapt the material, but must give appropriate credit to the source, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Hughes, David M
Cheyne, Christopher P
Ashton, Matthew
Coffey, Emer
Crozier, Alex
Semple, Malcolm G
Buchan, Iain
García-Fiñana, Marta
Association of SARS-CoV-2 viral load distributions with individual demographics and suspected variant type: results from the Liverpool community testing pilot, England, 6 November 2020 to 8 September 2021
title Association of SARS-CoV-2 viral load distributions with individual demographics and suspected variant type: results from the Liverpool community testing pilot, England, 6 November 2020 to 8 September 2021
title_full Association of SARS-CoV-2 viral load distributions with individual demographics and suspected variant type: results from the Liverpool community testing pilot, England, 6 November 2020 to 8 September 2021
title_fullStr Association of SARS-CoV-2 viral load distributions with individual demographics and suspected variant type: results from the Liverpool community testing pilot, England, 6 November 2020 to 8 September 2021
title_full_unstemmed Association of SARS-CoV-2 viral load distributions with individual demographics and suspected variant type: results from the Liverpool community testing pilot, England, 6 November 2020 to 8 September 2021
title_short Association of SARS-CoV-2 viral load distributions with individual demographics and suspected variant type: results from the Liverpool community testing pilot, England, 6 November 2020 to 8 September 2021
title_sort association of sars-cov-2 viral load distributions with individual demographics and suspected variant type: results from the liverpool community testing pilot, england, 6 november 2020 to 8 september 2021
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9881177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36700865
http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.4.2200129
work_keys_str_mv AT hughesdavidm associationofsarscov2viralloaddistributionswithindividualdemographicsandsuspectedvarianttyperesultsfromtheliverpoolcommunitytestingpilotengland6november2020to8september2021
AT cheynechristopherp associationofsarscov2viralloaddistributionswithindividualdemographicsandsuspectedvarianttyperesultsfromtheliverpoolcommunitytestingpilotengland6november2020to8september2021
AT ashtonmatthew associationofsarscov2viralloaddistributionswithindividualdemographicsandsuspectedvarianttyperesultsfromtheliverpoolcommunitytestingpilotengland6november2020to8september2021
AT coffeyemer associationofsarscov2viralloaddistributionswithindividualdemographicsandsuspectedvarianttyperesultsfromtheliverpoolcommunitytestingpilotengland6november2020to8september2021
AT crozieralex associationofsarscov2viralloaddistributionswithindividualdemographicsandsuspectedvarianttyperesultsfromtheliverpoolcommunitytestingpilotengland6november2020to8september2021
AT semplemalcolmg associationofsarscov2viralloaddistributionswithindividualdemographicsandsuspectedvarianttyperesultsfromtheliverpoolcommunitytestingpilotengland6november2020to8september2021
AT buchaniain associationofsarscov2viralloaddistributionswithindividualdemographicsandsuspectedvarianttyperesultsfromtheliverpoolcommunitytestingpilotengland6november2020to8september2021
AT garciafinanamarta associationofsarscov2viralloaddistributionswithindividualdemographicsandsuspectedvarianttyperesultsfromtheliverpoolcommunitytestingpilotengland6november2020to8september2021