Cargando…

Screening for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings: An implementation-oriented systematic review

BACKGROUND: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a population health problem affecting millions of women worldwide. Screening for IPV within healthcare settings can identify women who experience IPV and inform counseling, referrals, and interventions to improve their health outcomes. Unfortunately, ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miller, Christopher J, Adjognon, Omonyêlé L, Brady, Julianne E, Dichter, Melissa E, Iverson, Katherine M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9881185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36712586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26334895211039894
_version_ 1784879059974488064
author Miller, Christopher J
Adjognon, Omonyêlé L
Brady, Julianne E
Dichter, Melissa E
Iverson, Katherine M
author_facet Miller, Christopher J
Adjognon, Omonyêlé L
Brady, Julianne E
Dichter, Melissa E
Iverson, Katherine M
author_sort Miller, Christopher J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a population health problem affecting millions of women worldwide. Screening for IPV within healthcare settings can identify women who experience IPV and inform counseling, referrals, and interventions to improve their health outcomes. Unfortunately, many screening programs used to detect IPV have only been tested in research contexts featuring externally funded study staff and resources. This systematic review therefore investigated the utility of IPV screening administered by frontline clinical personnel. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review focusing on studies of IPV screening programs for women delivered by frontline healthcare staff. We based our data synthesis on two widely used implementation models (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance [RE-AIM] and Proctor's dimensions of implementation effectiveness). RESULTS: We extracted data from 59 qualifying studies. Based on data extraction guided by the RE-AIM framework, the median reach of the IPV screening programs was high (80%), but Emergency Department (ED) settings were found to have a much lower reach (47%). The median screen positive rate was 11%, which is comparable to the screen-positive rate found in studies using externally funded research staff. Among those screening positive, a median of 32% received a referral to follow-up services. Based on data extraction guided by Proctor's dimension of appropriateness, a lack of available referral services frustrated some efforts to implement IPV screening. Among studies reporting data on maintenance or sustainability of IPV screening programs, only half concluded that IPV screening rates held steady during the maintenance phase. Other domains of the RE-AIM and Proctor frameworks (e.g., implementation fidelity and costs) were reported less frequently. CONCLUSIONS: IPV is a population health issue, and successfully implementing IPV screening programs may be part of the solution. Our review emphasizes the importance of ongoing provider trainings, readily available referral sources, and consistent institutional support in maintaining appropriate IPV screening programs. PLAIN LANGUAGE ABSTRACT: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a population health problem affecting millions of women worldwide. IPV screening and response can identify women who experience IPV and can inform interventions to improve their health outcomes. Unfortunately, many of the screening programs used to detect IPV have only been tested in research contexts featuring administration by externally funded study staff. This systematic review of IPV screening programs for women is particularly novel, as previous reviews have not focused on clinical implementation. It provides a better understanding of successful ways of implementing IPV screening and response practices with frontline clinical personnel in the context of routine care. Successfully implementing IPV screening programs may help mitigate the harms resulting from IPV against women. Findings from this review can inform future efforts to improve implementation of IPV screening programs in clinical settings to ensure that the victims of IPV have access to appropriate counseling, resources, and referrals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9881185
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98811852023-01-27 Screening for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings: An implementation-oriented systematic review Miller, Christopher J Adjognon, Omonyêlé L Brady, Julianne E Dichter, Melissa E Iverson, Katherine M Implement Res Pract Review BACKGROUND: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a population health problem affecting millions of women worldwide. Screening for IPV within healthcare settings can identify women who experience IPV and inform counseling, referrals, and interventions to improve their health outcomes. Unfortunately, many screening programs used to detect IPV have only been tested in research contexts featuring externally funded study staff and resources. This systematic review therefore investigated the utility of IPV screening administered by frontline clinical personnel. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review focusing on studies of IPV screening programs for women delivered by frontline healthcare staff. We based our data synthesis on two widely used implementation models (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance [RE-AIM] and Proctor's dimensions of implementation effectiveness). RESULTS: We extracted data from 59 qualifying studies. Based on data extraction guided by the RE-AIM framework, the median reach of the IPV screening programs was high (80%), but Emergency Department (ED) settings were found to have a much lower reach (47%). The median screen positive rate was 11%, which is comparable to the screen-positive rate found in studies using externally funded research staff. Among those screening positive, a median of 32% received a referral to follow-up services. Based on data extraction guided by Proctor's dimension of appropriateness, a lack of available referral services frustrated some efforts to implement IPV screening. Among studies reporting data on maintenance or sustainability of IPV screening programs, only half concluded that IPV screening rates held steady during the maintenance phase. Other domains of the RE-AIM and Proctor frameworks (e.g., implementation fidelity and costs) were reported less frequently. CONCLUSIONS: IPV is a population health issue, and successfully implementing IPV screening programs may be part of the solution. Our review emphasizes the importance of ongoing provider trainings, readily available referral sources, and consistent institutional support in maintaining appropriate IPV screening programs. PLAIN LANGUAGE ABSTRACT: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a population health problem affecting millions of women worldwide. IPV screening and response can identify women who experience IPV and can inform interventions to improve their health outcomes. Unfortunately, many of the screening programs used to detect IPV have only been tested in research contexts featuring administration by externally funded study staff. This systematic review of IPV screening programs for women is particularly novel, as previous reviews have not focused on clinical implementation. It provides a better understanding of successful ways of implementing IPV screening and response practices with frontline clinical personnel in the context of routine care. Successfully implementing IPV screening programs may help mitigate the harms resulting from IPV against women. Findings from this review can inform future efforts to improve implementation of IPV screening programs in clinical settings to ensure that the victims of IPV have access to appropriate counseling, resources, and referrals. SAGE Publications 2021-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9881185/ /pubmed/36712586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26334895211039894 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review
Miller, Christopher J
Adjognon, Omonyêlé L
Brady, Julianne E
Dichter, Melissa E
Iverson, Katherine M
Screening for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings: An implementation-oriented systematic review
title Screening for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings: An implementation-oriented systematic review
title_full Screening for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings: An implementation-oriented systematic review
title_fullStr Screening for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings: An implementation-oriented systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Screening for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings: An implementation-oriented systematic review
title_short Screening for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings: An implementation-oriented systematic review
title_sort screening for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings: an implementation-oriented systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9881185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36712586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26334895211039894
work_keys_str_mv AT millerchristopherj screeningforintimatepartnerviolenceinhealthcaresettingsanimplementationorientedsystematicreview
AT adjognonomonyelel screeningforintimatepartnerviolenceinhealthcaresettingsanimplementationorientedsystematicreview
AT bradyjuliannee screeningforintimatepartnerviolenceinhealthcaresettingsanimplementationorientedsystematicreview
AT dichtermelissae screeningforintimatepartnerviolenceinhealthcaresettingsanimplementationorientedsystematicreview
AT iversonkatherinem screeningforintimatepartnerviolenceinhealthcaresettingsanimplementationorientedsystematicreview