Cargando…

Comparison of the effect of oral and vaginal misoprostol on labor induction: updating a systematic review and meta-analysis of interventional studies

OBJECTIVES: This study is aimed to compare the effect of oral misoprostol with vaginal misoprostol to induce labor as a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: Electronic databases including PubMed [Medline], Scopus, Web of science, Embase, Ovid, Cochrane library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Rahimi, Maryam, Haghighi, Ladan, Baradaran, Hamid Reza, Azami, Mobin, Larijani, Samaneh Saghafian, Kazemzadeh, Paniz, Moradi, Yousef
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2023
Materias:	Research
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9881312/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36707858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01007-8

Ejemplares similares

Intravaginal Isoniazid (INH) and Sublingual Misoprostol Versus Sublingual Misoprostol Alone for First-Trimester Induced Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial
por: Haghighi, Ladan, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Intravaginal isonicotinic acid hydrazide (INH) versus misoprostol for cervical ripening prior to hysteroscopy
por: Haghighi, Ladan, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Oral misoprostol, low dose vaginal misoprostol, and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: Randomized controlled trial
por: Young, David C., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Pharmacokinetics of vaginal versus buccal misoprostol for labor induction at term
por: Vorontsova, Yana, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol with Foley Catheter for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
por: Vahid Roudsari, Fatemeh, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

A comparison of misoprostol vaginal insert and misoprostol vaginal tablets for induction of labor in nulliparous women: a retrospective cohort study
por: Marsdal, Kjersti Engen, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Comparison of Intracervical Foley’s Catheter With Vaginal Misoprostol Versus Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
por: Kadu, Nivedita A, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Comparison of the outcomes of normal vaginal delivery with and without spinal anesthesia in mothers admitted to the maternity ward of Firoozabadi Hospital
por: Larijani, Samaneh Saghafian, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The Efficacy of Misoprostol Vaginal Inserts for Induction of Labor in Women with Very Unfavorable Cervices
por: Socha, Maciej W., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Is Misoprostol Vaginal Insert Safe for the Induction of Labor in High-Risk Pregnancy Obese Women?
por: Varlas, Valentin Nicolae, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Maternal and fetal outcomes in women undergoing induction of labor with low dose vaginal misoprostol
por: Shafqat, Tanveer, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Foley catheter plus misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for labor induction
por: Elpo, Jhonathan Alcides, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Effect of extra-amniotic Foley’s catheter and vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol alone on cervical ripening and induction of labor in Kenya, a randomized controlled trial
por: Osoti, Alfred, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: a cohort study
por: Bolla, Daniele, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Comparative study of titrated oral misoprostol solution and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term pregnancy
por: Wang, Xiu, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

A critical appraisal of the misoprostol removable, controlled-release vaginal delivery system of labor induction
por: Patte, Charlotte, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Clinical experience with misoprostol vaginal insert for induction of labor: a prospective clinical observational study
por: Schmidt, Markus, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Vaginal Versus Sublingual Misoprostol for Labor Induction at Term and Post Term: a Randomized Prospective Study
por: Ayati, Sedigheh, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Comparing the effects of vaginal misoprostol, laminaria, and extra amniotic saline infusion on cervical ripening and induction of labor
por: Tabasi, Zohreh, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Sublingual misoprostol vs. oral misoprostol solution for induction of labor: A retrospective study
por: Amini, Mahdi, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Induction of Labor at Term with Oral Misoprostol or as a Vaginal Insert and Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert – A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study
por: Beyer, Jana, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Foley Catheter versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Labour Induction
por: Noor, Nasreen, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Association of Helicobacter pylori infection with the risk of metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Azami, Mobin, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Labor Induction with Intravaginal Misoprostol versus Spontaneous Labor: Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes
por: Ozbasli, Esra, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Labor induction with randomized comparison of cervical, oral and intravaginal misoprostol
por: Dadashaliha, Masoumeh, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Can the Induction of Labor with Misoprostol Increase Maternal Blood Loss?
por: Souza, Paulo César Praciano, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Sublingual versus Vaginal Misoprostol for the Induction of Labor at Term: A Randomized, Triple-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial
por: Jahromi, Bahia Namavar, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Labor Induction with Orally Administrated Misoprostol: A Retrospective Cohort Study
por: Wallstrom, Tove, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Survey of Provider Preferences Regarding the Route of Misoprostol for Induction of Labor at Term
por: Towns, Rachel, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Induction of Labor using Misoprostol in a Tertiary Hospital in the Southeast of Brazil
por: Silva, Tácito Augusto Godoy, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence around the world: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Azami, Mobin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

A pilot study to compare propranolol and misoprostol versus misoprostol and placebo for induction of labor in primigravidae; a randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial
por: Abdel Hamid, Ahmed Sherif, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Diagnostic Accuracy of Imaging Devices in Glaucoma: An Updated Meta-Analysis
por: Moradi, Yousef, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Safety and efficacy of titrated oral misoprostol solution versus vaginal dinoprostone for induction of labor: A single‐center randomized control trial
por: Wang, Xiu, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Effect of vaginal washing before Misoprostol insertion on cervical ripening before induction of labor: A randomized single‐blind clinical trial
por: Kabodmehri, Roya, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Effect of delayed misoprostol dosing interval for induction of labor: a retrospective study
por: Harman Crowell, Elizabeth H., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Induction of Labor in Primigravid Term Pregnancy with Misoprostol or Dinoprostone: A Comparative Study
por: Arif, Rizwana, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Outpatient vs inpatient induction of labor with oral misoprostol: A retrospective study
por: Hallén, Natalie, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Misoprostol vs dinoprostone vaginal insert in labour induction: comparison of obstetrical outcome
por: Mlodawski, Jakub, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

A novel misoprostol delivery system for induction of labor: clinical utility and patient considerations
por: Stephenson, Megan L, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_3cotr97tb5lmu485di8urepuri