Cargando…

Application of plasma donor-derived cell free DNA for lung allograft rejection diagnosis in lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) has been applied to monitor acute rejection (AR) in kidney and heart transplantation. This study was aimed to investigate the application of dd-cfDNA levels in the diagnosis of AR and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) among the lung transpla...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ju, Chunrong, Xu, Xin, Zhang, Jianheng, Chen, Ao, Lian, Qiaoyan, Liu, Feng, Liu, Haitao, Cai, Yuhang, Zou, Yanjun, Yang, Yalan, Zhou, Yang, He, Jianxing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9881379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36703125
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-022-02229-y
_version_ 1784879097909870592
author Ju, Chunrong
Xu, Xin
Zhang, Jianheng
Chen, Ao
Lian, Qiaoyan
Liu, Feng
Liu, Haitao
Cai, Yuhang
Zou, Yanjun
Yang, Yalan
Zhou, Yang
He, Jianxing
author_facet Ju, Chunrong
Xu, Xin
Zhang, Jianheng
Chen, Ao
Lian, Qiaoyan
Liu, Feng
Liu, Haitao
Cai, Yuhang
Zou, Yanjun
Yang, Yalan
Zhou, Yang
He, Jianxing
author_sort Ju, Chunrong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) has been applied to monitor acute rejection (AR) in kidney and heart transplantation. This study was aimed to investigate the application of dd-cfDNA levels in the diagnosis of AR and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) among the lung transplantation recipients (LTRs). METHODS: One hundred and seventy LTRs were enrolled at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University between 1 June 2015 and 30 March 2021. Patients were divided into 4 groups: stable group, AR group, infection group and CLAD group. The level of dd-cfDNA was analyzed using target region sequencing and the performance characteristics of dd-cfDNA for diagnosis of AR and CLAD were determined, respectively. RESULTS: Kruskal–Wallis test showed that there were some significant differences in the level of dd-cfDNA (%) among the 4 groups, with p < 0.001. Among them, the level of dd-cfDNA (%) was highest (median 2.17, IQR [1.40–3.82]) in AR group, and higher in CLAD group (median 1.07, IQR [0.98–1.31]), but lower in infection group (median 0.71, IQR [0.57–1.07]) and lowest in stable group (median 0.71, IQR [0.61–0.84]). AUC-ROC curve analysis showed that the threshold of dd-cfDNA for AR was 1.17%, with sensitivity being 89.19% and specificity being 86.47%, and the optimal threshold of 0.89% was determined of CLAD, with sensitivity being 95.00% and specificity of 76.99%. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma dd-cfDNA could be a useful tool for the assessment of lung allograft rejection, including AR and CLAD, and holds promise as a noninvasive biomarker for “allograft injury” in both acute and chronic rejection following lung transplantation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12890-022-02229-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9881379
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98813792023-01-28 Application of plasma donor-derived cell free DNA for lung allograft rejection diagnosis in lung transplant recipients Ju, Chunrong Xu, Xin Zhang, Jianheng Chen, Ao Lian, Qiaoyan Liu, Feng Liu, Haitao Cai, Yuhang Zou, Yanjun Yang, Yalan Zhou, Yang He, Jianxing BMC Pulm Med Research BACKGROUND: Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) has been applied to monitor acute rejection (AR) in kidney and heart transplantation. This study was aimed to investigate the application of dd-cfDNA levels in the diagnosis of AR and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) among the lung transplantation recipients (LTRs). METHODS: One hundred and seventy LTRs were enrolled at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University between 1 June 2015 and 30 March 2021. Patients were divided into 4 groups: stable group, AR group, infection group and CLAD group. The level of dd-cfDNA was analyzed using target region sequencing and the performance characteristics of dd-cfDNA for diagnosis of AR and CLAD were determined, respectively. RESULTS: Kruskal–Wallis test showed that there were some significant differences in the level of dd-cfDNA (%) among the 4 groups, with p < 0.001. Among them, the level of dd-cfDNA (%) was highest (median 2.17, IQR [1.40–3.82]) in AR group, and higher in CLAD group (median 1.07, IQR [0.98–1.31]), but lower in infection group (median 0.71, IQR [0.57–1.07]) and lowest in stable group (median 0.71, IQR [0.61–0.84]). AUC-ROC curve analysis showed that the threshold of dd-cfDNA for AR was 1.17%, with sensitivity being 89.19% and specificity being 86.47%, and the optimal threshold of 0.89% was determined of CLAD, with sensitivity being 95.00% and specificity of 76.99%. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma dd-cfDNA could be a useful tool for the assessment of lung allograft rejection, including AR and CLAD, and holds promise as a noninvasive biomarker for “allograft injury” in both acute and chronic rejection following lung transplantation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12890-022-02229-y. BioMed Central 2023-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9881379/ /pubmed/36703125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-022-02229-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ju, Chunrong
Xu, Xin
Zhang, Jianheng
Chen, Ao
Lian, Qiaoyan
Liu, Feng
Liu, Haitao
Cai, Yuhang
Zou, Yanjun
Yang, Yalan
Zhou, Yang
He, Jianxing
Application of plasma donor-derived cell free DNA for lung allograft rejection diagnosis in lung transplant recipients
title Application of plasma donor-derived cell free DNA for lung allograft rejection diagnosis in lung transplant recipients
title_full Application of plasma donor-derived cell free DNA for lung allograft rejection diagnosis in lung transplant recipients
title_fullStr Application of plasma donor-derived cell free DNA for lung allograft rejection diagnosis in lung transplant recipients
title_full_unstemmed Application of plasma donor-derived cell free DNA for lung allograft rejection diagnosis in lung transplant recipients
title_short Application of plasma donor-derived cell free DNA for lung allograft rejection diagnosis in lung transplant recipients
title_sort application of plasma donor-derived cell free dna for lung allograft rejection diagnosis in lung transplant recipients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9881379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36703125
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-022-02229-y
work_keys_str_mv AT juchunrong applicationofplasmadonorderivedcellfreednaforlungallograftrejectiondiagnosisinlungtransplantrecipients
AT xuxin applicationofplasmadonorderivedcellfreednaforlungallograftrejectiondiagnosisinlungtransplantrecipients
AT zhangjianheng applicationofplasmadonorderivedcellfreednaforlungallograftrejectiondiagnosisinlungtransplantrecipients
AT chenao applicationofplasmadonorderivedcellfreednaforlungallograftrejectiondiagnosisinlungtransplantrecipients
AT lianqiaoyan applicationofplasmadonorderivedcellfreednaforlungallograftrejectiondiagnosisinlungtransplantrecipients
AT liufeng applicationofplasmadonorderivedcellfreednaforlungallograftrejectiondiagnosisinlungtransplantrecipients
AT liuhaitao applicationofplasmadonorderivedcellfreednaforlungallograftrejectiondiagnosisinlungtransplantrecipients
AT caiyuhang applicationofplasmadonorderivedcellfreednaforlungallograftrejectiondiagnosisinlungtransplantrecipients
AT zouyanjun applicationofplasmadonorderivedcellfreednaforlungallograftrejectiondiagnosisinlungtransplantrecipients
AT yangyalan applicationofplasmadonorderivedcellfreednaforlungallograftrejectiondiagnosisinlungtransplantrecipients
AT zhouyang applicationofplasmadonorderivedcellfreednaforlungallograftrejectiondiagnosisinlungtransplantrecipients
AT hejianxing applicationofplasmadonorderivedcellfreednaforlungallograftrejectiondiagnosisinlungtransplantrecipients