Cargando…

Sampling Twitter users for social science research: evidence from a systematic review of the literature

All social media platforms can be used to conduct social science research, but Twitter is the most popular as it provides its data via several Application Programming Interfaces, which allows qualitative and quantitative research to be conducted with its members. As Twitter is a huge universe, both...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Vicente, Paula
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9881529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36721461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01615-w
_version_ 1784879125992833024
author Vicente, Paula
author_facet Vicente, Paula
author_sort Vicente, Paula
collection PubMed
description All social media platforms can be used to conduct social science research, but Twitter is the most popular as it provides its data via several Application Programming Interfaces, which allows qualitative and quantitative research to be conducted with its members. As Twitter is a huge universe, both in number of users and amount of data, sampling is generally required when using it for research purposes. Researchers only recently began to question whether tweet-level sampling—in which the tweet is the sampling unit—should be replaced by user-level sampling—in which the user is the sampling unit. The major rationale for this shift is that tweet-level sampling does not consider the fact that some core discussants on Twitter are much more active tweeters than other less active users, thus causing a sample biased towards the more active users. The knowledge on how to select representative samples of users in the Twitterverse is still insufficient despite its relevance for reliable and valid research outcomes. This paper contributes to this topic by presenting a systematic quantitative literature review of sampling plans designed and executed in the context of social science research in Twitter, including: (1) the definition of the target populations, (2) the sampling frames used to support sample selection, (3) the sampling methods used to obtain samples of Twitter users, (4) how data is collected from Twitter users, (5) the size of the samples, and (6) how research validity is addressed. This review can be a methodological guide for professionals and academics who want to conduct social science research involving Twitter users and the Twitterverse.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9881529
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98815292023-01-27 Sampling Twitter users for social science research: evidence from a systematic review of the literature Vicente, Paula Qual Quant Article All social media platforms can be used to conduct social science research, but Twitter is the most popular as it provides its data via several Application Programming Interfaces, which allows qualitative and quantitative research to be conducted with its members. As Twitter is a huge universe, both in number of users and amount of data, sampling is generally required when using it for research purposes. Researchers only recently began to question whether tweet-level sampling—in which the tweet is the sampling unit—should be replaced by user-level sampling—in which the user is the sampling unit. The major rationale for this shift is that tweet-level sampling does not consider the fact that some core discussants on Twitter are much more active tweeters than other less active users, thus causing a sample biased towards the more active users. The knowledge on how to select representative samples of users in the Twitterverse is still insufficient despite its relevance for reliable and valid research outcomes. This paper contributes to this topic by presenting a systematic quantitative literature review of sampling plans designed and executed in the context of social science research in Twitter, including: (1) the definition of the target populations, (2) the sampling frames used to support sample selection, (3) the sampling methods used to obtain samples of Twitter users, (4) how data is collected from Twitter users, (5) the size of the samples, and (6) how research validity is addressed. This review can be a methodological guide for professionals and academics who want to conduct social science research involving Twitter users and the Twitterverse. Springer Netherlands 2023-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9881529/ /pubmed/36721461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01615-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Vicente, Paula
Sampling Twitter users for social science research: evidence from a systematic review of the literature
title Sampling Twitter users for social science research: evidence from a systematic review of the literature
title_full Sampling Twitter users for social science research: evidence from a systematic review of the literature
title_fullStr Sampling Twitter users for social science research: evidence from a systematic review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Sampling Twitter users for social science research: evidence from a systematic review of the literature
title_short Sampling Twitter users for social science research: evidence from a systematic review of the literature
title_sort sampling twitter users for social science research: evidence from a systematic review of the literature
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9881529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36721461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01615-w
work_keys_str_mv AT vicentepaula samplingtwitterusersforsocialscienceresearchevidencefromasystematicreviewoftheliterature