Cargando…

Qualitative Analysis of a Remote Monitoring Intervention for Managing Heart Failure

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is one of the most common reasons for hospital admission and is a major cause of morbidity, mortality, and increasing health care costs. The EMPOWER study was a randomized trial that used remote monitoring technology to track patients’ weight and diuretic adherence and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klaiman, Tamar, Ianotte, L.G., Josephs, Michael, Russell, Louise B., Norton, Laurie, Mehta, Shivan, Troxel, Andrea, Zhu, Jingsan, Volpp, Kevin, Asch, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Journal Experts 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9882593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36712044
http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2206783/v1
_version_ 1784879323732246528
author Klaiman, Tamar
Ianotte, L.G.
Josephs, Michael
Russell, Louise B.
Norton, Laurie
Mehta, Shivan
Troxel, Andrea
Zhu, Jingsan
Volpp, Kevin
Asch, David
author_facet Klaiman, Tamar
Ianotte, L.G.
Josephs, Michael
Russell, Louise B.
Norton, Laurie
Mehta, Shivan
Troxel, Andrea
Zhu, Jingsan
Volpp, Kevin
Asch, David
author_sort Klaiman, Tamar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is one of the most common reasons for hospital admission and is a major cause of morbidity, mortality, and increasing health care costs. The EMPOWER study was a randomized trial that used remote monitoring technology to track patients’ weight and diuretic adherence and a state-of-the-art approach derived from behavioral economics to motivate adherence to the reverse monitoring technology. OBJECTIVE: The goal was to explore patient and clinician perceptions of the program and its impact on health outcomes and better understand why some patients/clinicians did better/worse than others in response to the intervention. APPROACH: This was a retrospective qualitative study to understand the trial’s processes, reflecting on successes and areas for improvement for future iterations of behavioral economic interventions. KEY RESULTS: Many patients felt supported, and they appreciated the intervention. Many also appreciated the lottery intervention, and while it was not an incentive for enrolling for many respondents, it may have increased adherence during the study. Clinicians felt that the intervention integrated well into their workflow, but the number of alerts was burdensome. Additionally, responses to alerts varied considerably by provider, perhaps because there are no professional guidelines for alerts unaccompanied by severe symptoms. CONCLUSION: Those interviews offer insights into the potential reasons for the study’s null result and opportunities for improvements in the future. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02708654
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9882593
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Journal Experts
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98825932023-01-28 Qualitative Analysis of a Remote Monitoring Intervention for Managing Heart Failure Klaiman, Tamar Ianotte, L.G. Josephs, Michael Russell, Louise B. Norton, Laurie Mehta, Shivan Troxel, Andrea Zhu, Jingsan Volpp, Kevin Asch, David Res Sq Article BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is one of the most common reasons for hospital admission and is a major cause of morbidity, mortality, and increasing health care costs. The EMPOWER study was a randomized trial that used remote monitoring technology to track patients’ weight and diuretic adherence and a state-of-the-art approach derived from behavioral economics to motivate adherence to the reverse monitoring technology. OBJECTIVE: The goal was to explore patient and clinician perceptions of the program and its impact on health outcomes and better understand why some patients/clinicians did better/worse than others in response to the intervention. APPROACH: This was a retrospective qualitative study to understand the trial’s processes, reflecting on successes and areas for improvement for future iterations of behavioral economic interventions. KEY RESULTS: Many patients felt supported, and they appreciated the intervention. Many also appreciated the lottery intervention, and while it was not an incentive for enrolling for many respondents, it may have increased adherence during the study. Clinicians felt that the intervention integrated well into their workflow, but the number of alerts was burdensome. Additionally, responses to alerts varied considerably by provider, perhaps because there are no professional guidelines for alerts unaccompanied by severe symptoms. CONCLUSION: Those interviews offer insights into the potential reasons for the study’s null result and opportunities for improvements in the future. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02708654 American Journal Experts 2023-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9882593/ /pubmed/36712044 http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2206783/v1 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use.
spellingShingle Article
Klaiman, Tamar
Ianotte, L.G.
Josephs, Michael
Russell, Louise B.
Norton, Laurie
Mehta, Shivan
Troxel, Andrea
Zhu, Jingsan
Volpp, Kevin
Asch, David
Qualitative Analysis of a Remote Monitoring Intervention for Managing Heart Failure
title Qualitative Analysis of a Remote Monitoring Intervention for Managing Heart Failure
title_full Qualitative Analysis of a Remote Monitoring Intervention for Managing Heart Failure
title_fullStr Qualitative Analysis of a Remote Monitoring Intervention for Managing Heart Failure
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative Analysis of a Remote Monitoring Intervention for Managing Heart Failure
title_short Qualitative Analysis of a Remote Monitoring Intervention for Managing Heart Failure
title_sort qualitative analysis of a remote monitoring intervention for managing heart failure
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9882593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36712044
http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2206783/v1
work_keys_str_mv AT klaimantamar qualitativeanalysisofaremotemonitoringinterventionformanagingheartfailure
AT ianottelg qualitativeanalysisofaremotemonitoringinterventionformanagingheartfailure
AT josephsmichael qualitativeanalysisofaremotemonitoringinterventionformanagingheartfailure
AT russelllouiseb qualitativeanalysisofaremotemonitoringinterventionformanagingheartfailure
AT nortonlaurie qualitativeanalysisofaremotemonitoringinterventionformanagingheartfailure
AT mehtashivan qualitativeanalysisofaremotemonitoringinterventionformanagingheartfailure
AT troxelandrea qualitativeanalysisofaremotemonitoringinterventionformanagingheartfailure
AT zhujingsan qualitativeanalysisofaremotemonitoringinterventionformanagingheartfailure
AT volppkevin qualitativeanalysisofaremotemonitoringinterventionformanagingheartfailure
AT aschdavid qualitativeanalysisofaremotemonitoringinterventionformanagingheartfailure