Cargando…

Effectiveness of tailored COVID-19 messages for vulnerable Australians: A study protocol

Multiple approaches can be used to communicate public health messages through mass media. It is unclear which approaches are superior for meeting the needs of the general community along with vulnerable population subgroups. To compare different public health strategy communication approaches for in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jepson, Megan, Williams, Nathan, Haines, Terry P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9882702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36706131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280865
_version_ 1784879351023534080
author Jepson, Megan
Williams, Nathan
Haines, Terry P.
author_facet Jepson, Megan
Williams, Nathan
Haines, Terry P.
author_sort Jepson, Megan
collection PubMed
description Multiple approaches can be used to communicate public health messages through mass media. It is unclear which approaches are superior for meeting the needs of the general community along with vulnerable population subgroups. To compare different public health strategy communication approaches for influencing the COVID-safe behavioural intentions of both community and vulnerable population subgroups. This study will conduct three concurrent ‘helix’ randomised controlled trials with Latin square sequencing and factorial intervention allocation to assess the effectiveness of different communication strategies amongst the Australian general community and six subgroups that are considered vulnerable to contracting, transmitting or experiencing severe consequences of COVID-19 infection. Communication approaches being compared include: the format of communication (written versus video), who is providing information (general practitioner, politician, community-representative), what is said and how it is delivered (direct information provision versus conversational approach) and the visual content of video messaging (animation versus ‘talking head’). Recruited participants will be randomly allocated to receive a specific combination of health messaging strategies using six different COVID-19 context areas. Outcomes will be assessed in a survey using behaviour intention questions, and questions surrounding level of agreement with feeling represented in the health messaging strategy. These trials will use a unique research approach to provide an experimental evidence base to help guide development of impactful and inclusive COVID-19 and related public health messaging. All three trials are registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR). Trial 1: Update and impact of Government recommendations about COVID-19 (coronavirus)-Stage 3, Trial 1, vulnerable subgroup populations (ACTRN12622000606785). Trial 2: Update and impact of Government recommendations about COVID-19 (coronavirus)-Stage 3, Trial 2, community group (ACTRN12622000605796). Trial 3: Update and impact of Government recommendations about COVID-19 (coronavirus)-Stage 3, Trial 3, What communication strategy is most effective for both vulnerable and community group populations? (ACTRN12622000617763).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9882702
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98827022023-01-28 Effectiveness of tailored COVID-19 messages for vulnerable Australians: A study protocol Jepson, Megan Williams, Nathan Haines, Terry P. PLoS One Study Protocol Multiple approaches can be used to communicate public health messages through mass media. It is unclear which approaches are superior for meeting the needs of the general community along with vulnerable population subgroups. To compare different public health strategy communication approaches for influencing the COVID-safe behavioural intentions of both community and vulnerable population subgroups. This study will conduct three concurrent ‘helix’ randomised controlled trials with Latin square sequencing and factorial intervention allocation to assess the effectiveness of different communication strategies amongst the Australian general community and six subgroups that are considered vulnerable to contracting, transmitting or experiencing severe consequences of COVID-19 infection. Communication approaches being compared include: the format of communication (written versus video), who is providing information (general practitioner, politician, community-representative), what is said and how it is delivered (direct information provision versus conversational approach) and the visual content of video messaging (animation versus ‘talking head’). Recruited participants will be randomly allocated to receive a specific combination of health messaging strategies using six different COVID-19 context areas. Outcomes will be assessed in a survey using behaviour intention questions, and questions surrounding level of agreement with feeling represented in the health messaging strategy. These trials will use a unique research approach to provide an experimental evidence base to help guide development of impactful and inclusive COVID-19 and related public health messaging. All three trials are registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR). Trial 1: Update and impact of Government recommendations about COVID-19 (coronavirus)-Stage 3, Trial 1, vulnerable subgroup populations (ACTRN12622000606785). Trial 2: Update and impact of Government recommendations about COVID-19 (coronavirus)-Stage 3, Trial 2, community group (ACTRN12622000605796). Trial 3: Update and impact of Government recommendations about COVID-19 (coronavirus)-Stage 3, Trial 3, What communication strategy is most effective for both vulnerable and community group populations? (ACTRN12622000617763). Public Library of Science 2023-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9882702/ /pubmed/36706131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280865 Text en © 2023 Jepson et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Jepson, Megan
Williams, Nathan
Haines, Terry P.
Effectiveness of tailored COVID-19 messages for vulnerable Australians: A study protocol
title Effectiveness of tailored COVID-19 messages for vulnerable Australians: A study protocol
title_full Effectiveness of tailored COVID-19 messages for vulnerable Australians: A study protocol
title_fullStr Effectiveness of tailored COVID-19 messages for vulnerable Australians: A study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of tailored COVID-19 messages for vulnerable Australians: A study protocol
title_short Effectiveness of tailored COVID-19 messages for vulnerable Australians: A study protocol
title_sort effectiveness of tailored covid-19 messages for vulnerable australians: a study protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9882702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36706131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280865
work_keys_str_mv AT jepsonmegan effectivenessoftailoredcovid19messagesforvulnerableaustraliansastudyprotocol
AT williamsnathan effectivenessoftailoredcovid19messagesforvulnerableaustraliansastudyprotocol
AT hainesterryp effectivenessoftailoredcovid19messagesforvulnerableaustraliansastudyprotocol
AT effectivenessoftailoredcovid19messagesforvulnerableaustraliansastudyprotocol