Cargando…
Multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment training simulation by paired teachers using case-based teaching of oral histopathology that promotes clinical thinking
The multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment (MDT) model has significant advantages in the diagnosing and treatment of intricate cases. In addition, it can eliminate subspecialty barriers and provide a more accurate and individualized diagnosis and treatment plan. It has been assumed that the futur...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9883218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36707532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28786-8 |
Sumario: | The multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment (MDT) model has significant advantages in the diagnosing and treatment of intricate cases. In addition, it can eliminate subspecialty barriers and provide a more accurate and individualized diagnosis and treatment plan. It has been assumed that the future development of diagnosis and treatment will retain this course, and the MDT is an essential type of clinical thinking, especially for medical students. This study attempted to guide stomatology undergraduates’ thinking via an MDT simulation in oral histopathology practicums through typical case-based education and paired-teachers’ explanations. The aim was to cultivate clinical thinking among students based on individual cases and to improve class participation and students’ clinical thinking ability. Forty-six undergraduates in a 5-year stomatology program who enrolled in 2018 participated in a simulation MDT model. Ten typical clinical cases were selected, and they were previously collected and analyzed by clinicians in accordance with the simulation MDT model and handed out to teachers and students before the class. Two to three cases were interpreted by teacher pairs that included a pathologist (oral pathology teacher) and a radiologist (oral imaging teacher). The rest of the cases were used for simulation MDT student groups in class. The oral pathology teacher and oral imaging teacher illustrated the corresponding data from typical cases in advance. The simulation MDT group members acting as a surgeon, pathologist, or radiologist demonstrated their own cases assigned randomly before the class. A curriculum satisfaction survey illustrated that the simulation MDT group agreed that simulation MDT was novel for them, and they had a strong sense of participation. The mimic MDT training with typical cases guided by paired teachers was useful for establishing student clinical thinking. |
---|