Cargando…

Rotational-motion measurement of the sacroiliac joint using upright MRI scanning and intensity-based registration: is there a sex difference?

PURPOSE: The sacroiliac joint (SIJ) has attracted increasing attention as a source of low back and groin pain, but the kinematics of SIJ against standing load and its sex difference remain unclear due to the difficulty of in vivo load study. An upright magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system can pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tani, Tetsuro, Takao, Masaki, Soufi, Mazen, Otake, Yoshito, Fukuda, Norio, Hamada, Hidetoshi, Uemura, Keisuke, Sato, Yoshinobu, Sugano, Nobuhiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9883344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36565369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02806-w
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: The sacroiliac joint (SIJ) has attracted increasing attention as a source of low back and groin pain, but the kinematics of SIJ against standing load and its sex difference remain unclear due to the difficulty of in vivo load study. An upright magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system can provide in vivo imaging both in the supine and standing positions. The reliability of the mobility of SIJ against the standing load was evaluated and its sex difference was examined in healthy young volunteers using an upright MRI. METHOD: Static (reliability) and kinematic studies were performed. In the static study, a dry bone of pelvic ring embedded in gel form and frozen in the plastic box was used. In the kinematic study, 19 volunteers (10 males, 9 females) with a mean age of 23.9 years were included. The ilium positions for the sacrum in supine and standing positions were measured against the pelvic coordinates to evaluate the mobility of the SIJ. RESULTS: In the static study, the residual error of the rotation of the SIJ study was < 0.2°. In the kinematic study, the mean values of SIJ sagittal rotation from supine to standing position in males and females were − 0.9° ± 0.7° (mean ± standard deviation) and − 1.7° ± 0.8°, respectively. The sex difference was statistically significant (p = 0.04). The sagittal rotation of the SIJ showed a significant correlation with the sacral slope. CONCLUSION: The residual error for measuring the SIJ rotation using the upright MRI was < 0.2°. The young healthy participants showed sex differences in the sagittal rotation of the SIJ against the standing load and the females showed a larger posterior rotation of the ilium against the sacrum from the supine to standing position than the males. Therefore, upright MRI is useful to investigate SIJ motion.