Cargando…

The pathological risk score: A new deep learning‐based signature for predicting survival in cervical cancer

PURPOSE: To develop and validate a deep learning‐based pathological risk score (RS) with an aim of predicting patients' prognosis to investigate the potential association between the information within the whole slide image (WSI) and cervical cancer prognosis. METHODS: A total of 251 patients w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Chi, Cao, Yuye, Li, Weili, Liu, Zhenyu, Liu, Ping, Tian, Xin, Sun, Caixia, Wang, Wuliang, Gao, Han, Kang, Shan, Wang, Shaoguang, Jiang, Jingying, Chen, Chunlin, Tian, Jie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9883425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35762423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4953
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To develop and validate a deep learning‐based pathological risk score (RS) with an aim of predicting patients' prognosis to investigate the potential association between the information within the whole slide image (WSI) and cervical cancer prognosis. METHODS: A total of 251 patients with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Stage IA1–IIA2 cervical cancer who underwent surgery without any preoperative treatment were enrolled in this study. Both the clinical characteristics and WSI of each patient were collected. To construct a prognosis‐associate RS, high‐dimensional pathological features were extracted using a convolutional neural network with an autoencoder. With the score threshold selected by X‐tile, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was applied to verify the prediction performance of RS in overall survival (OS) and disease‐free survival (DFS) in both the training and testing datasets, as well as different clinical subgroups. RESULTS: For the OS and DFS prediction in the testing cohort, RS showed a Harrell's concordance index of higher than 0.700, while the areas under the curve (AUC) achieved up to 0.800 in the same cohort. Furthermore, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis demonstrated that RS was a potential prognostic factor, even in different datasets or subgroups. It could further distinguish the survival differences after clinicopathological risk stratification. CONCLUSION: In the present study, we developed an effective signature in cervical cancer for prognosis prediction and patients' stratification in OS and DFS.