Cargando…
Evaluating allied health students’ readiness for placement learning
BACKGROUND: Experiential learning opportunities, such as work integrated learning placements, are often challenging for health professional students. It is therefore imperative that students are adequately prepared before engaging in placement learning. Operationalising ‘readiness for learning on pl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9883866/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36709272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04005-w |
_version_ | 1784879595874418688 |
---|---|
author | Judd, Belinda Brentnall, Jennie Scanlan, Justin Newton Thomson, Kate Blackstock, Felicity Mandrusiak, Allison Chipchase, Lucy Phillips, Anna McAllister, Sue |
author_facet | Judd, Belinda Brentnall, Jennie Scanlan, Justin Newton Thomson, Kate Blackstock, Felicity Mandrusiak, Allison Chipchase, Lucy Phillips, Anna McAllister, Sue |
author_sort | Judd, Belinda |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Experiential learning opportunities, such as work integrated learning placements, are often challenging for health professional students. It is therefore imperative that students are adequately prepared before engaging in placement learning. Operationalising ‘readiness for learning on placement’ as a construct, is necessary for providing quality student feedback and assessment. METHODS: An integrative mixed methods approach was adopted for this study, utilising a survey to canvass the perspectives of academics, students, and placement educators around the construct of readiness to inform potential assessment items. An assessment tool measuring student readiness for placement was then developed. Data from occupational therapy, physiotherapy and speech pathology programs were evaluated using Rasch analysis to explore the unidimensionality of this construct. RESULTS: The online survey was completed by 64 participants, confirming the importance and measurability of foundational skills integral to readiness for placement learning. These foundational skills were then reflected in a pilot 20-item tool covering domains of professional and learner behaviour, communication, information gathering skills and reasoning. The Rasch analysis of 359 pre-registration student assessments confirmed unidimensionality, suggesting that the skills and attributes (operationalised as assessment items) that are considered part of ‘readiness for placement’ are components of this construct. Together, these findings provide support that the items on this tool are relevant and representative of the skills and behaviours that indicate readiness for placement learning. Two items regarding documentation and appropriate professional dress demonstrated some lower importance scores and interpretation variance warranting further investigation. CONCLUSION: Through the exploration of the construct of readiness for placement learning, we have created and subsequently revised, an innovative assessment tool that measures novice students’ pre-placement capabilities. Further research is now needed to explore the psychometric properties of the tool. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9883866 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98838662023-01-29 Evaluating allied health students’ readiness for placement learning Judd, Belinda Brentnall, Jennie Scanlan, Justin Newton Thomson, Kate Blackstock, Felicity Mandrusiak, Allison Chipchase, Lucy Phillips, Anna McAllister, Sue BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: Experiential learning opportunities, such as work integrated learning placements, are often challenging for health professional students. It is therefore imperative that students are adequately prepared before engaging in placement learning. Operationalising ‘readiness for learning on placement’ as a construct, is necessary for providing quality student feedback and assessment. METHODS: An integrative mixed methods approach was adopted for this study, utilising a survey to canvass the perspectives of academics, students, and placement educators around the construct of readiness to inform potential assessment items. An assessment tool measuring student readiness for placement was then developed. Data from occupational therapy, physiotherapy and speech pathology programs were evaluated using Rasch analysis to explore the unidimensionality of this construct. RESULTS: The online survey was completed by 64 participants, confirming the importance and measurability of foundational skills integral to readiness for placement learning. These foundational skills were then reflected in a pilot 20-item tool covering domains of professional and learner behaviour, communication, information gathering skills and reasoning. The Rasch analysis of 359 pre-registration student assessments confirmed unidimensionality, suggesting that the skills and attributes (operationalised as assessment items) that are considered part of ‘readiness for placement’ are components of this construct. Together, these findings provide support that the items on this tool are relevant and representative of the skills and behaviours that indicate readiness for placement learning. Two items regarding documentation and appropriate professional dress demonstrated some lower importance scores and interpretation variance warranting further investigation. CONCLUSION: Through the exploration of the construct of readiness for placement learning, we have created and subsequently revised, an innovative assessment tool that measures novice students’ pre-placement capabilities. Further research is now needed to explore the psychometric properties of the tool. BioMed Central 2023-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9883866/ /pubmed/36709272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04005-w Text en © Crown 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Judd, Belinda Brentnall, Jennie Scanlan, Justin Newton Thomson, Kate Blackstock, Felicity Mandrusiak, Allison Chipchase, Lucy Phillips, Anna McAllister, Sue Evaluating allied health students’ readiness for placement learning |
title | Evaluating allied health students’ readiness for placement learning |
title_full | Evaluating allied health students’ readiness for placement learning |
title_fullStr | Evaluating allied health students’ readiness for placement learning |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating allied health students’ readiness for placement learning |
title_short | Evaluating allied health students’ readiness for placement learning |
title_sort | evaluating allied health students’ readiness for placement learning |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9883866/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36709272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04005-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT juddbelinda evaluatingalliedhealthstudentsreadinessforplacementlearning AT brentnalljennie evaluatingalliedhealthstudentsreadinessforplacementlearning AT scanlanjustinnewton evaluatingalliedhealthstudentsreadinessforplacementlearning AT thomsonkate evaluatingalliedhealthstudentsreadinessforplacementlearning AT blackstockfelicity evaluatingalliedhealthstudentsreadinessforplacementlearning AT mandrusiakallison evaluatingalliedhealthstudentsreadinessforplacementlearning AT chipchaselucy evaluatingalliedhealthstudentsreadinessforplacementlearning AT phillipsanna evaluatingalliedhealthstudentsreadinessforplacementlearning AT mcallistersue evaluatingalliedhealthstudentsreadinessforplacementlearning |