Cargando…

LH level on ovulation trigger day has a different impact on the outcomes of agonist and antagonist regimens during in vitro fertilization

BACKGROUND: To assess the impact of the luteinizing hormone level on ovulation trigger day (LHOTD) on in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes in gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and antagonist regimens during fresh embryo transfer cycles. METHODS: A stepwise, progressive multivariate regr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luo, Xi, Deng, Bo, Li, Lei, Ma, Rui, Mai, Xuancheng, Wu, Ze
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9883898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36707867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-023-01110-8
_version_ 1784879602786631680
author Luo, Xi
Deng, Bo
Li, Lei
Ma, Rui
Mai, Xuancheng
Wu, Ze
author_facet Luo, Xi
Deng, Bo
Li, Lei
Ma, Rui
Mai, Xuancheng
Wu, Ze
author_sort Luo, Xi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To assess the impact of the luteinizing hormone level on ovulation trigger day (LHOTD) on in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes in gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and antagonist regimens during fresh embryo transfer cycles. METHODS: A stepwise, progressive multivariate regression model was introduced to assess the effect of the LHOTD on clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. Mantel‒Haenszel stratification analysis was used to examine the association between the LHOTD and clinical outcomes with the antagonist regimen. RESULTS: The LHOTD had different distributions in the agonist and antagonist regimens. The cycles were assigned into three LHOTD tertile groups. In the agonist regimen, compared with the 1(st) tertile (T1), in the 2(nd) (T2) and 3(rd) (T3) tertiles, the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) (95% confidence intervals [CIs], P value) were 1.187 (1.047–1.345, 0.007) and 1.420 (1.252–1.610, < 0.001) for clinical pregnancy, respectively, and 1.149 (1.009–1.309, 0.036) and 1.476 (1.296–1.681, < 0.001) for live birth. In the antagonist regimen, there was no significant difference in clinical pregnancy and live birth rates among the tertiles. However, in the stratified group of patients aged less than 35 years, the ORs (95% CIs, P value) of T2 and T3 were 1.316 (1.051–1.648, 0.017) and 1.354 (1.077–1.703, 0.009) for clinical pregnancy, respectively, and 1.275 (1.008–1.611, 0.043) and1.269 (0.999–1.611, 0.051) for live birth. Moreover, there was a discrepancy in the results among the subdivided LHOTD T1 groups adopting the antagonist regimen. Compared with that of the < 1.06 mIU/mL subgroup, the ORs (95% CIs, P value) of the > 1.5 mIU/mL subgroup were 1.693 (1.194–2.400, 0.003) for clinical pregnancy and 1.532 (1.057–2.220, 0.024) for live birth after eliminating potential confounders. CONCLUSIONS: The LHOTD was profoundly suppressed in the agonist regimen, and its level was positively correlated with clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. In contrast, in the flexible antagonist regimen, the LHOTD was significantly higher than that in the agonist regimen and did not correlate with the outcome, except for women in the nonadvanced age group and those with an excessively suppressed LHOTD. Further investigation is required to determine the rationale for these findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9883898
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98838982023-01-29 LH level on ovulation trigger day has a different impact on the outcomes of agonist and antagonist regimens during in vitro fertilization Luo, Xi Deng, Bo Li, Lei Ma, Rui Mai, Xuancheng Wu, Ze J Ovarian Res Research BACKGROUND: To assess the impact of the luteinizing hormone level on ovulation trigger day (LHOTD) on in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes in gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and antagonist regimens during fresh embryo transfer cycles. METHODS: A stepwise, progressive multivariate regression model was introduced to assess the effect of the LHOTD on clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. Mantel‒Haenszel stratification analysis was used to examine the association between the LHOTD and clinical outcomes with the antagonist regimen. RESULTS: The LHOTD had different distributions in the agonist and antagonist regimens. The cycles were assigned into three LHOTD tertile groups. In the agonist regimen, compared with the 1(st) tertile (T1), in the 2(nd) (T2) and 3(rd) (T3) tertiles, the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) (95% confidence intervals [CIs], P value) were 1.187 (1.047–1.345, 0.007) and 1.420 (1.252–1.610, < 0.001) for clinical pregnancy, respectively, and 1.149 (1.009–1.309, 0.036) and 1.476 (1.296–1.681, < 0.001) for live birth. In the antagonist regimen, there was no significant difference in clinical pregnancy and live birth rates among the tertiles. However, in the stratified group of patients aged less than 35 years, the ORs (95% CIs, P value) of T2 and T3 were 1.316 (1.051–1.648, 0.017) and 1.354 (1.077–1.703, 0.009) for clinical pregnancy, respectively, and 1.275 (1.008–1.611, 0.043) and1.269 (0.999–1.611, 0.051) for live birth. Moreover, there was a discrepancy in the results among the subdivided LHOTD T1 groups adopting the antagonist regimen. Compared with that of the < 1.06 mIU/mL subgroup, the ORs (95% CIs, P value) of the > 1.5 mIU/mL subgroup were 1.693 (1.194–2.400, 0.003) for clinical pregnancy and 1.532 (1.057–2.220, 0.024) for live birth after eliminating potential confounders. CONCLUSIONS: The LHOTD was profoundly suppressed in the agonist regimen, and its level was positively correlated with clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. In contrast, in the flexible antagonist regimen, the LHOTD was significantly higher than that in the agonist regimen and did not correlate with the outcome, except for women in the nonadvanced age group and those with an excessively suppressed LHOTD. Further investigation is required to determine the rationale for these findings. BioMed Central 2023-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9883898/ /pubmed/36707867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-023-01110-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Luo, Xi
Deng, Bo
Li, Lei
Ma, Rui
Mai, Xuancheng
Wu, Ze
LH level on ovulation trigger day has a different impact on the outcomes of agonist and antagonist regimens during in vitro fertilization
title LH level on ovulation trigger day has a different impact on the outcomes of agonist and antagonist regimens during in vitro fertilization
title_full LH level on ovulation trigger day has a different impact on the outcomes of agonist and antagonist regimens during in vitro fertilization
title_fullStr LH level on ovulation trigger day has a different impact on the outcomes of agonist and antagonist regimens during in vitro fertilization
title_full_unstemmed LH level on ovulation trigger day has a different impact on the outcomes of agonist and antagonist regimens during in vitro fertilization
title_short LH level on ovulation trigger day has a different impact on the outcomes of agonist and antagonist regimens during in vitro fertilization
title_sort lh level on ovulation trigger day has a different impact on the outcomes of agonist and antagonist regimens during in vitro fertilization
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9883898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36707867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-023-01110-8
work_keys_str_mv AT luoxi lhlevelonovulationtriggerdayhasadifferentimpactontheoutcomesofagonistandantagonistregimensduringinvitrofertilization
AT dengbo lhlevelonovulationtriggerdayhasadifferentimpactontheoutcomesofagonistandantagonistregimensduringinvitrofertilization
AT lilei lhlevelonovulationtriggerdayhasadifferentimpactontheoutcomesofagonistandantagonistregimensduringinvitrofertilization
AT marui lhlevelonovulationtriggerdayhasadifferentimpactontheoutcomesofagonistandantagonistregimensduringinvitrofertilization
AT maixuancheng lhlevelonovulationtriggerdayhasadifferentimpactontheoutcomesofagonistandantagonistregimensduringinvitrofertilization
AT wuze lhlevelonovulationtriggerdayhasadifferentimpactontheoutcomesofagonistandantagonistregimensduringinvitrofertilization