Cargando…
Scaling patterns of body plans differ among squirrel ecotypes
Body size is often hypothesized to facilitate or constrain morphological diversity in the cranial, appendicular, and axial skeletons. However, how overall body shape scales with body size (i.e., body shape allometry) and whether these scaling patterns differ between ecological groups remains poorly...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9884040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36718452 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14800 |
_version_ | 1784879632663707648 |
---|---|
author | Linden, Tate J. Burtner, Abigail E. Rickman, Johannah McFeely, Annika Santana, Sharlene E. Law, Chris J. |
author_facet | Linden, Tate J. Burtner, Abigail E. Rickman, Johannah McFeely, Annika Santana, Sharlene E. Law, Chris J. |
author_sort | Linden, Tate J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Body size is often hypothesized to facilitate or constrain morphological diversity in the cranial, appendicular, and axial skeletons. However, how overall body shape scales with body size (i.e., body shape allometry) and whether these scaling patterns differ between ecological groups remains poorly investigated. Here, we test whether and how the relationships between body shape, body size, and limb lengths differ among species with different locomotor specializations, and describe the underlying morphological components that contribute to body shape evolution among squirrel (Sciuridae) ecotypes. We quantified the body size and shape of 87 squirrel species from osteological specimens held at museum collections. Using phylogenetic comparative methods, we first found that body shape and its underlying morphological components scale allometrically with body size, but these allometric patterns differ among squirrel ecotypes: chipmunks and gliding squirrels exhibited more elongate bodies with increasing body sizes whereas ground squirrels exhibited more robust bodies with increasing body size. Second, we found that only ground squirrels exhibit a relationship between forelimb length and body shape, where more elongate species exhibit relatively shorter forelimbs. Third, we found that the relative length of the ribs and elongation or shortening of the thoracic region contributes the most to body shape evolution across squirrels. Overall, our work contributes to the growing understanding of mammalian body shape evolution and how it is influenced by body size and locomotor ecology, in this case from robust subterranean to gracile gliding squirrels. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9884040 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98840402023-01-29 Scaling patterns of body plans differ among squirrel ecotypes Linden, Tate J. Burtner, Abigail E. Rickman, Johannah McFeely, Annika Santana, Sharlene E. Law, Chris J. PeerJ Ecology Body size is often hypothesized to facilitate or constrain morphological diversity in the cranial, appendicular, and axial skeletons. However, how overall body shape scales with body size (i.e., body shape allometry) and whether these scaling patterns differ between ecological groups remains poorly investigated. Here, we test whether and how the relationships between body shape, body size, and limb lengths differ among species with different locomotor specializations, and describe the underlying morphological components that contribute to body shape evolution among squirrel (Sciuridae) ecotypes. We quantified the body size and shape of 87 squirrel species from osteological specimens held at museum collections. Using phylogenetic comparative methods, we first found that body shape and its underlying morphological components scale allometrically with body size, but these allometric patterns differ among squirrel ecotypes: chipmunks and gliding squirrels exhibited more elongate bodies with increasing body sizes whereas ground squirrels exhibited more robust bodies with increasing body size. Second, we found that only ground squirrels exhibit a relationship between forelimb length and body shape, where more elongate species exhibit relatively shorter forelimbs. Third, we found that the relative length of the ribs and elongation or shortening of the thoracic region contributes the most to body shape evolution across squirrels. Overall, our work contributes to the growing understanding of mammalian body shape evolution and how it is influenced by body size and locomotor ecology, in this case from robust subterranean to gracile gliding squirrels. PeerJ Inc. 2023-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9884040/ /pubmed/36718452 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14800 Text en ©2023 Linden et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Ecology Linden, Tate J. Burtner, Abigail E. Rickman, Johannah McFeely, Annika Santana, Sharlene E. Law, Chris J. Scaling patterns of body plans differ among squirrel ecotypes |
title | Scaling patterns of body plans differ among squirrel ecotypes |
title_full | Scaling patterns of body plans differ among squirrel ecotypes |
title_fullStr | Scaling patterns of body plans differ among squirrel ecotypes |
title_full_unstemmed | Scaling patterns of body plans differ among squirrel ecotypes |
title_short | Scaling patterns of body plans differ among squirrel ecotypes |
title_sort | scaling patterns of body plans differ among squirrel ecotypes |
topic | Ecology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9884040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36718452 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14800 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lindentatej scalingpatternsofbodyplansdifferamongsquirrelecotypes AT burtnerabigaile scalingpatternsofbodyplansdifferamongsquirrelecotypes AT rickmanjohannah scalingpatternsofbodyplansdifferamongsquirrelecotypes AT mcfeelyannika scalingpatternsofbodyplansdifferamongsquirrelecotypes AT santanasharlenee scalingpatternsofbodyplansdifferamongsquirrelecotypes AT lawchrisj scalingpatternsofbodyplansdifferamongsquirrelecotypes |