Cargando…

Scaling patterns of body plans differ among squirrel ecotypes

Body size is often hypothesized to facilitate or constrain morphological diversity in the cranial, appendicular, and axial skeletons. However, how overall body shape scales with body size (i.e., body shape allometry) and whether these scaling patterns differ between ecological groups remains poorly...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Linden, Tate J., Burtner, Abigail E., Rickman, Johannah, McFeely, Annika, Santana, Sharlene E., Law, Chris J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9884040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36718452
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14800
_version_ 1784879632663707648
author Linden, Tate J.
Burtner, Abigail E.
Rickman, Johannah
McFeely, Annika
Santana, Sharlene E.
Law, Chris J.
author_facet Linden, Tate J.
Burtner, Abigail E.
Rickman, Johannah
McFeely, Annika
Santana, Sharlene E.
Law, Chris J.
author_sort Linden, Tate J.
collection PubMed
description Body size is often hypothesized to facilitate or constrain morphological diversity in the cranial, appendicular, and axial skeletons. However, how overall body shape scales with body size (i.e., body shape allometry) and whether these scaling patterns differ between ecological groups remains poorly investigated. Here, we test whether and how the relationships between body shape, body size, and limb lengths differ among species with different locomotor specializations, and describe the underlying morphological components that contribute to body shape evolution among squirrel (Sciuridae) ecotypes. We quantified the body size and shape of 87 squirrel species from osteological specimens held at museum collections. Using phylogenetic comparative methods, we first found that body shape and its underlying morphological components scale allometrically with body size, but these allometric patterns differ among squirrel ecotypes: chipmunks and gliding squirrels exhibited more elongate bodies with increasing body sizes whereas ground squirrels exhibited more robust bodies with increasing body size. Second, we found that only ground squirrels exhibit a relationship between forelimb length and body shape, where more elongate species exhibit relatively shorter forelimbs. Third, we found that the relative length of the ribs and elongation or shortening of the thoracic region contributes the most to body shape evolution across squirrels. Overall, our work contributes to the growing understanding of mammalian body shape evolution and how it is influenced by body size and locomotor ecology, in this case from robust subterranean to gracile gliding squirrels.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9884040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98840402023-01-29 Scaling patterns of body plans differ among squirrel ecotypes Linden, Tate J. Burtner, Abigail E. Rickman, Johannah McFeely, Annika Santana, Sharlene E. Law, Chris J. PeerJ Ecology Body size is often hypothesized to facilitate or constrain morphological diversity in the cranial, appendicular, and axial skeletons. However, how overall body shape scales with body size (i.e., body shape allometry) and whether these scaling patterns differ between ecological groups remains poorly investigated. Here, we test whether and how the relationships between body shape, body size, and limb lengths differ among species with different locomotor specializations, and describe the underlying morphological components that contribute to body shape evolution among squirrel (Sciuridae) ecotypes. We quantified the body size and shape of 87 squirrel species from osteological specimens held at museum collections. Using phylogenetic comparative methods, we first found that body shape and its underlying morphological components scale allometrically with body size, but these allometric patterns differ among squirrel ecotypes: chipmunks and gliding squirrels exhibited more elongate bodies with increasing body sizes whereas ground squirrels exhibited more robust bodies with increasing body size. Second, we found that only ground squirrels exhibit a relationship between forelimb length and body shape, where more elongate species exhibit relatively shorter forelimbs. Third, we found that the relative length of the ribs and elongation or shortening of the thoracic region contributes the most to body shape evolution across squirrels. Overall, our work contributes to the growing understanding of mammalian body shape evolution and how it is influenced by body size and locomotor ecology, in this case from robust subterranean to gracile gliding squirrels. PeerJ Inc. 2023-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9884040/ /pubmed/36718452 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14800 Text en ©2023 Linden et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Ecology
Linden, Tate J.
Burtner, Abigail E.
Rickman, Johannah
McFeely, Annika
Santana, Sharlene E.
Law, Chris J.
Scaling patterns of body plans differ among squirrel ecotypes
title Scaling patterns of body plans differ among squirrel ecotypes
title_full Scaling patterns of body plans differ among squirrel ecotypes
title_fullStr Scaling patterns of body plans differ among squirrel ecotypes
title_full_unstemmed Scaling patterns of body plans differ among squirrel ecotypes
title_short Scaling patterns of body plans differ among squirrel ecotypes
title_sort scaling patterns of body plans differ among squirrel ecotypes
topic Ecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9884040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36718452
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14800
work_keys_str_mv AT lindentatej scalingpatternsofbodyplansdifferamongsquirrelecotypes
AT burtnerabigaile scalingpatternsofbodyplansdifferamongsquirrelecotypes
AT rickmanjohannah scalingpatternsofbodyplansdifferamongsquirrelecotypes
AT mcfeelyannika scalingpatternsofbodyplansdifferamongsquirrelecotypes
AT santanasharlenee scalingpatternsofbodyplansdifferamongsquirrelecotypes
AT lawchrisj scalingpatternsofbodyplansdifferamongsquirrelecotypes