Cargando…
Evidence of validity and reliability of Jumpo 2 and MyJump 2 for estimating vertical jump variables
BACKGROUND: We investigated the concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of the Jumpo 2 and MyJump 2 apps for estimating jump height, and the mean values of force, velocity, and power produced during countermovement (CMJ) and squat jumps (SJ). METHODS: Physically active university aged men (n...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9884043/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36718456 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14558 |
_version_ | 1784879633385127936 |
---|---|
author | Vieira, Amilton Ribeiro, Gabriela L. Macedo, Victor de Araújo Rocha Junior, Valdinar Baptista, Roberto de Souza Gonçalves, Carlos Cunha, Rafael Tufano, James |
author_facet | Vieira, Amilton Ribeiro, Gabriela L. Macedo, Victor de Araújo Rocha Junior, Valdinar Baptista, Roberto de Souza Gonçalves, Carlos Cunha, Rafael Tufano, James |
author_sort | Vieira, Amilton |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We investigated the concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of the Jumpo 2 and MyJump 2 apps for estimating jump height, and the mean values of force, velocity, and power produced during countermovement (CMJ) and squat jumps (SJ). METHODS: Physically active university aged men (n = 10, 20 ± 3 years, 176 ± 6 cm, 68 ± 9 kg) jumped on a force plate (i.e., criterion) while being recorded by a smartphone slow-motion camera. The videos were analyzed using Jumpo 2 and MyJump 2 using a Samsung Galaxy S7 powered by the Android system. Validity and reliability were determined by regression analysis, typical error of estimates and measurements, and intraclass correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Both apps provided a reliable estimate of jump height and the mean values of force, velocity, and power. Furthermore, estimates of jump height for CMJ and SJ and the mean force of the CMJ were valid. However, the apps presented impractical or poor validity correlations for velocity and power. Compared with criterion, the apps underestimated the velocity of the CMJ. CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, Jumpo 2 and MyJump 2 both provide a valid measure of jump height, but the remaining variables provided by these apps must be viewed with caution since the validity of force depends on jump type, while velocity (and as consequence power) could not be well estimated from the apps. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9884043 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98840432023-01-29 Evidence of validity and reliability of Jumpo 2 and MyJump 2 for estimating vertical jump variables Vieira, Amilton Ribeiro, Gabriela L. Macedo, Victor de Araújo Rocha Junior, Valdinar Baptista, Roberto de Souza Gonçalves, Carlos Cunha, Rafael Tufano, James PeerJ Biomechanics BACKGROUND: We investigated the concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of the Jumpo 2 and MyJump 2 apps for estimating jump height, and the mean values of force, velocity, and power produced during countermovement (CMJ) and squat jumps (SJ). METHODS: Physically active university aged men (n = 10, 20 ± 3 years, 176 ± 6 cm, 68 ± 9 kg) jumped on a force plate (i.e., criterion) while being recorded by a smartphone slow-motion camera. The videos were analyzed using Jumpo 2 and MyJump 2 using a Samsung Galaxy S7 powered by the Android system. Validity and reliability were determined by regression analysis, typical error of estimates and measurements, and intraclass correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Both apps provided a reliable estimate of jump height and the mean values of force, velocity, and power. Furthermore, estimates of jump height for CMJ and SJ and the mean force of the CMJ were valid. However, the apps presented impractical or poor validity correlations for velocity and power. Compared with criterion, the apps underestimated the velocity of the CMJ. CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, Jumpo 2 and MyJump 2 both provide a valid measure of jump height, but the remaining variables provided by these apps must be viewed with caution since the validity of force depends on jump type, while velocity (and as consequence power) could not be well estimated from the apps. PeerJ Inc. 2023-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9884043/ /pubmed/36718456 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14558 Text en ©2023 Vieira et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Biomechanics Vieira, Amilton Ribeiro, Gabriela L. Macedo, Victor de Araújo Rocha Junior, Valdinar Baptista, Roberto de Souza Gonçalves, Carlos Cunha, Rafael Tufano, James Evidence of validity and reliability of Jumpo 2 and MyJump 2 for estimating vertical jump variables |
title | Evidence of validity and reliability of Jumpo 2 and MyJump 2 for estimating vertical jump variables |
title_full | Evidence of validity and reliability of Jumpo 2 and MyJump 2 for estimating vertical jump variables |
title_fullStr | Evidence of validity and reliability of Jumpo 2 and MyJump 2 for estimating vertical jump variables |
title_full_unstemmed | Evidence of validity and reliability of Jumpo 2 and MyJump 2 for estimating vertical jump variables |
title_short | Evidence of validity and reliability of Jumpo 2 and MyJump 2 for estimating vertical jump variables |
title_sort | evidence of validity and reliability of jumpo 2 and myjump 2 for estimating vertical jump variables |
topic | Biomechanics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9884043/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36718456 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14558 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vieiraamilton evidenceofvalidityandreliabilityofjumpo2andmyjump2forestimatingverticaljumpvariables AT ribeirogabrielal evidenceofvalidityandreliabilityofjumpo2andmyjump2forestimatingverticaljumpvariables AT macedovictor evidenceofvalidityandreliabilityofjumpo2andmyjump2forestimatingverticaljumpvariables AT dearaujorochajuniorvaldinar evidenceofvalidityandreliabilityofjumpo2andmyjump2forestimatingverticaljumpvariables AT baptistarobertodesouza evidenceofvalidityandreliabilityofjumpo2andmyjump2forestimatingverticaljumpvariables AT goncalvescarlos evidenceofvalidityandreliabilityofjumpo2andmyjump2forestimatingverticaljumpvariables AT cunharafael evidenceofvalidityandreliabilityofjumpo2andmyjump2forestimatingverticaljumpvariables AT tufanojames evidenceofvalidityandreliabilityofjumpo2andmyjump2forestimatingverticaljumpvariables |