Cargando…

Computer-aided design and 3-dimensional artificial/convolutional neural network for digital partial dental crown synthesis and validation

The current multiphase, invitro study developed and validated a 3-dimensional convolutional neural network (3D-CNN) to generate partial dental crowns (PDC) for use in restorative dentistry. The effectiveness of desktop laser and intraoral scanners in generating data for the purpose of 3D-CNN was fir...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farook, Taseef Hasan, Ahmed, Saif, Jamayet, Nafij Bin, Rashid, Farah, Barman, Aparna, Sidhu, Preena, Patil, Pravinkumar, Lisan, Awsaf Mahmood, Eusufzai, Sumaya Zabin, Dudley, James, Daood, Umer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9884213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36709380
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28442-1
Descripción
Sumario:The current multiphase, invitro study developed and validated a 3-dimensional convolutional neural network (3D-CNN) to generate partial dental crowns (PDC) for use in restorative dentistry. The effectiveness of desktop laser and intraoral scanners in generating data for the purpose of 3D-CNN was first evaluated (phase 1). There were no significant differences in surface area [t-stat(df) = − 0.01 (10), mean difference = − 0.058, P > 0.99] and volume [t-stat(df) = 0.357(10)]. However, the intraoral scans were chosen for phase 2 as they produced a greater level of volumetric details (343.83 ± 43.52 mm(3)) compared to desktop laser scanning (322.70 ± 40.15 mm(3)). In phase 2, 120 tooth preparations were digitally synthesized from intraoral scans, and two clinicians designed the respective PDCs using computer-aided design (CAD) workflows on a personal computer setup. Statistical comparison by 3-factor ANOVA demonstrated significant differences in surface area (P < 0.001), volume (P < 0.001), and spatial overlap (P < 0.001), and therefore only the most accurate PDCs (n = 30) were picked to train the neural network (Phase 3). The current 3D-CNN produced a validation accuracy of 60%, validation loss of 0.68–0.87, sensitivity of 1.00, precision of 0.50–0.83, and serves as a proof-of-concept that 3D-CNN can predict and generate PDC prostheses in CAD for restorative dentistry.