Cargando…
Implications for COVID-19 vaccine uptake: A systematic review
BACKGROUND: Globally, increasing coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccination coverage remains a major public health concern in the face of high rates of COVID-19 hesitancy among the general population. We must understand the impact of the determinants of COVID-19 vaccine uptake when designing nationa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9884645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36738689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2023.01.020 |
_version_ | 1784879762128240640 |
---|---|
author | Adu, Peter Popoola, Tosin Medvedev, Oleg N. Collings, Sunny Mbinta, James Aspin, Clive Simpson, Colin R. |
author_facet | Adu, Peter Popoola, Tosin Medvedev, Oleg N. Collings, Sunny Mbinta, James Aspin, Clive Simpson, Colin R. |
author_sort | Adu, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Globally, increasing coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccination coverage remains a major public health concern in the face of high rates of COVID-19 hesitancy among the general population. We must understand the impact of the determinants of COVID-19 vaccine uptake when designing national vaccination programmes. We aimed to synthesise nationwide evidence regarding COVID-19 infodemics and the demographic, psychological, and social predictors of COVID-19 vaccination uptake. METHODS: We systematically searched seven databases between July 2021 and March 2022 to retrieve relevant articles published since COVID-19 was first reported on 31 December 2019 in Wuhan, China. Of the 12,502 peer-reviewed articles retrieved from the databases, 57 met the selection criteria and were included in this systematic review. We explored COVID-19 vaccine uptake determinants before and after the first COVID-19 vaccine roll-out by the Food and Drug Authority (FDA). RESULTS: Increased COVID-19 vaccine uptake rates were associated with decreased hesitancy. Concerns about COVID-19 vaccine safety, negative side effects, rapid development of the COVID-19 vaccine, and uncertainty about vaccine effectiveness were associated with reluctance to be vaccinated. After the US FDA approval of COVID-19 vaccines, phobia of medical procedures such as vaccine injection and inadequate information about vaccines were the main determinants of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. CONCLUSION: Addressing effectiveness and safety concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccines, as well as providing adequate information about vaccines and the impacts of pandemics, should be considered before implementation of any vaccination programme. Reassuring people about the safety of medical vaccination and using alternative procedures such as needle-free vaccination may help further increase vaccination uptake. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9884645 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98846452023-01-30 Implications for COVID-19 vaccine uptake: A systematic review Adu, Peter Popoola, Tosin Medvedev, Oleg N. Collings, Sunny Mbinta, James Aspin, Clive Simpson, Colin R. J Infect Public Health Review BACKGROUND: Globally, increasing coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccination coverage remains a major public health concern in the face of high rates of COVID-19 hesitancy among the general population. We must understand the impact of the determinants of COVID-19 vaccine uptake when designing national vaccination programmes. We aimed to synthesise nationwide evidence regarding COVID-19 infodemics and the demographic, psychological, and social predictors of COVID-19 vaccination uptake. METHODS: We systematically searched seven databases between July 2021 and March 2022 to retrieve relevant articles published since COVID-19 was first reported on 31 December 2019 in Wuhan, China. Of the 12,502 peer-reviewed articles retrieved from the databases, 57 met the selection criteria and were included in this systematic review. We explored COVID-19 vaccine uptake determinants before and after the first COVID-19 vaccine roll-out by the Food and Drug Authority (FDA). RESULTS: Increased COVID-19 vaccine uptake rates were associated with decreased hesitancy. Concerns about COVID-19 vaccine safety, negative side effects, rapid development of the COVID-19 vaccine, and uncertainty about vaccine effectiveness were associated with reluctance to be vaccinated. After the US FDA approval of COVID-19 vaccines, phobia of medical procedures such as vaccine injection and inadequate information about vaccines were the main determinants of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. CONCLUSION: Addressing effectiveness and safety concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccines, as well as providing adequate information about vaccines and the impacts of pandemics, should be considered before implementation of any vaccination programme. Reassuring people about the safety of medical vaccination and using alternative procedures such as needle-free vaccination may help further increase vaccination uptake. The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences. 2023-03 2023-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9884645/ /pubmed/36738689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2023.01.020 Text en © 2023 The Authors Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Review Adu, Peter Popoola, Tosin Medvedev, Oleg N. Collings, Sunny Mbinta, James Aspin, Clive Simpson, Colin R. Implications for COVID-19 vaccine uptake: A systematic review |
title | Implications for COVID-19 vaccine uptake: A systematic review |
title_full | Implications for COVID-19 vaccine uptake: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Implications for COVID-19 vaccine uptake: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Implications for COVID-19 vaccine uptake: A systematic review |
title_short | Implications for COVID-19 vaccine uptake: A systematic review |
title_sort | implications for covid-19 vaccine uptake: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9884645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36738689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2023.01.020 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT adupeter implicationsforcovid19vaccineuptakeasystematicreview AT popoolatosin implicationsforcovid19vaccineuptakeasystematicreview AT medvedevolegn implicationsforcovid19vaccineuptakeasystematicreview AT collingssunny implicationsforcovid19vaccineuptakeasystematicreview AT mbintajames implicationsforcovid19vaccineuptakeasystematicreview AT aspinclive implicationsforcovid19vaccineuptakeasystematicreview AT simpsoncolinr implicationsforcovid19vaccineuptakeasystematicreview |