Cargando…

Optimal cutoffs of growth discordance for the risk of preeclampsia in twin pregnancies: A single-center retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE: To explore the optimal cutoffs of growth discordance for the risk of preeclampsia in twin pregnancies. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study in a university hospital which included twins delivered from February 2013 to September 2020. Restrictive cubic spline (RCS) model was applied to th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Jie, An, Ping, Zhao, Huanqiang, Zhao, Ying, Zhou, Jizi, Zhou, Qiongjie, Li, Xiaotian, Xiong, Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9884673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36727028
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.1073729
_version_ 1784879768880021504
author Zhu, Jie
An, Ping
Zhao, Huanqiang
Zhao, Ying
Zhou, Jizi
Zhou, Qiongjie
Li, Xiaotian
Xiong, Yu
author_facet Zhu, Jie
An, Ping
Zhao, Huanqiang
Zhao, Ying
Zhou, Jizi
Zhou, Qiongjie
Li, Xiaotian
Xiong, Yu
author_sort Zhu, Jie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To explore the optimal cutoffs of growth discordance for the risk of preeclampsia in twin pregnancies. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study in a university hospital which included twins delivered from February 2013 to September 2020. Restrictive cubic spline (RCS) model was applied to the trend of intertwin birthweight difference (BWD) with the risk of preeclampsia. Logistic regression and subgroup analysis were performed to find the cut-off with statistical significance and clinical meaningfulness. RESULTS: A total of 2,631 women pregnant with twins were enrolled. RCS showed a nonlinear upward trend of preeclampsia with BWD, and the BWD of 15% was the initial rising point. With the confounders adjusted, only the group with BWD ≥ 25% was found to be significantly associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.44; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.74–3.42). Additionally, subgroup analysis showed that both monochorionic (MC) and small for gestational age (SGA) twins were more likely to complicate with preeclampsia. CONCLUSION: The growth discordance of 15% during pregnancy may be the preventive point of preeclampsia, and 25% may be the interventional point.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9884673
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98846732023-01-31 Optimal cutoffs of growth discordance for the risk of preeclampsia in twin pregnancies: A single-center retrospective cohort study Zhu, Jie An, Ping Zhao, Huanqiang Zhao, Ying Zhou, Jizi Zhou, Qiongjie Li, Xiaotian Xiong, Yu Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine OBJECTIVE: To explore the optimal cutoffs of growth discordance for the risk of preeclampsia in twin pregnancies. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study in a university hospital which included twins delivered from February 2013 to September 2020. Restrictive cubic spline (RCS) model was applied to the trend of intertwin birthweight difference (BWD) with the risk of preeclampsia. Logistic regression and subgroup analysis were performed to find the cut-off with statistical significance and clinical meaningfulness. RESULTS: A total of 2,631 women pregnant with twins were enrolled. RCS showed a nonlinear upward trend of preeclampsia with BWD, and the BWD of 15% was the initial rising point. With the confounders adjusted, only the group with BWD ≥ 25% was found to be significantly associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.44; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.74–3.42). Additionally, subgroup analysis showed that both monochorionic (MC) and small for gestational age (SGA) twins were more likely to complicate with preeclampsia. CONCLUSION: The growth discordance of 15% during pregnancy may be the preventive point of preeclampsia, and 25% may be the interventional point. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9884673/ /pubmed/36727028 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.1073729 Text en Copyright © 2023 Zhu, An, Zhao, Zhao, Zhou, Zhou, Li and Xiong. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Zhu, Jie
An, Ping
Zhao, Huanqiang
Zhao, Ying
Zhou, Jizi
Zhou, Qiongjie
Li, Xiaotian
Xiong, Yu
Optimal cutoffs of growth discordance for the risk of preeclampsia in twin pregnancies: A single-center retrospective cohort study
title Optimal cutoffs of growth discordance for the risk of preeclampsia in twin pregnancies: A single-center retrospective cohort study
title_full Optimal cutoffs of growth discordance for the risk of preeclampsia in twin pregnancies: A single-center retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Optimal cutoffs of growth discordance for the risk of preeclampsia in twin pregnancies: A single-center retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Optimal cutoffs of growth discordance for the risk of preeclampsia in twin pregnancies: A single-center retrospective cohort study
title_short Optimal cutoffs of growth discordance for the risk of preeclampsia in twin pregnancies: A single-center retrospective cohort study
title_sort optimal cutoffs of growth discordance for the risk of preeclampsia in twin pregnancies: a single-center retrospective cohort study
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9884673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36727028
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.1073729
work_keys_str_mv AT zhujie optimalcutoffsofgrowthdiscordancefortheriskofpreeclampsiaintwinpregnanciesasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT anping optimalcutoffsofgrowthdiscordancefortheriskofpreeclampsiaintwinpregnanciesasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT zhaohuanqiang optimalcutoffsofgrowthdiscordancefortheriskofpreeclampsiaintwinpregnanciesasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT zhaoying optimalcutoffsofgrowthdiscordancefortheriskofpreeclampsiaintwinpregnanciesasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT zhoujizi optimalcutoffsofgrowthdiscordancefortheriskofpreeclampsiaintwinpregnanciesasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT zhouqiongjie optimalcutoffsofgrowthdiscordancefortheriskofpreeclampsiaintwinpregnanciesasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT lixiaotian optimalcutoffsofgrowthdiscordancefortheriskofpreeclampsiaintwinpregnanciesasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT xiongyu optimalcutoffsofgrowthdiscordancefortheriskofpreeclampsiaintwinpregnanciesasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy