Cargando…
Optimal cutoffs of growth discordance for the risk of preeclampsia in twin pregnancies: A single-center retrospective cohort study
OBJECTIVE: To explore the optimal cutoffs of growth discordance for the risk of preeclampsia in twin pregnancies. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study in a university hospital which included twins delivered from February 2013 to September 2020. Restrictive cubic spline (RCS) model was applied to th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9884673/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36727028 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.1073729 |
_version_ | 1784879768880021504 |
---|---|
author | Zhu, Jie An, Ping Zhao, Huanqiang Zhao, Ying Zhou, Jizi Zhou, Qiongjie Li, Xiaotian Xiong, Yu |
author_facet | Zhu, Jie An, Ping Zhao, Huanqiang Zhao, Ying Zhou, Jizi Zhou, Qiongjie Li, Xiaotian Xiong, Yu |
author_sort | Zhu, Jie |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To explore the optimal cutoffs of growth discordance for the risk of preeclampsia in twin pregnancies. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study in a university hospital which included twins delivered from February 2013 to September 2020. Restrictive cubic spline (RCS) model was applied to the trend of intertwin birthweight difference (BWD) with the risk of preeclampsia. Logistic regression and subgroup analysis were performed to find the cut-off with statistical significance and clinical meaningfulness. RESULTS: A total of 2,631 women pregnant with twins were enrolled. RCS showed a nonlinear upward trend of preeclampsia with BWD, and the BWD of 15% was the initial rising point. With the confounders adjusted, only the group with BWD ≥ 25% was found to be significantly associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.44; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.74–3.42). Additionally, subgroup analysis showed that both monochorionic (MC) and small for gestational age (SGA) twins were more likely to complicate with preeclampsia. CONCLUSION: The growth discordance of 15% during pregnancy may be the preventive point of preeclampsia, and 25% may be the interventional point. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9884673 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98846732023-01-31 Optimal cutoffs of growth discordance for the risk of preeclampsia in twin pregnancies: A single-center retrospective cohort study Zhu, Jie An, Ping Zhao, Huanqiang Zhao, Ying Zhou, Jizi Zhou, Qiongjie Li, Xiaotian Xiong, Yu Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine OBJECTIVE: To explore the optimal cutoffs of growth discordance for the risk of preeclampsia in twin pregnancies. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study in a university hospital which included twins delivered from February 2013 to September 2020. Restrictive cubic spline (RCS) model was applied to the trend of intertwin birthweight difference (BWD) with the risk of preeclampsia. Logistic regression and subgroup analysis were performed to find the cut-off with statistical significance and clinical meaningfulness. RESULTS: A total of 2,631 women pregnant with twins were enrolled. RCS showed a nonlinear upward trend of preeclampsia with BWD, and the BWD of 15% was the initial rising point. With the confounders adjusted, only the group with BWD ≥ 25% was found to be significantly associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.44; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.74–3.42). Additionally, subgroup analysis showed that both monochorionic (MC) and small for gestational age (SGA) twins were more likely to complicate with preeclampsia. CONCLUSION: The growth discordance of 15% during pregnancy may be the preventive point of preeclampsia, and 25% may be the interventional point. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9884673/ /pubmed/36727028 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.1073729 Text en Copyright © 2023 Zhu, An, Zhao, Zhao, Zhou, Zhou, Li and Xiong. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine Zhu, Jie An, Ping Zhao, Huanqiang Zhao, Ying Zhou, Jizi Zhou, Qiongjie Li, Xiaotian Xiong, Yu Optimal cutoffs of growth discordance for the risk of preeclampsia in twin pregnancies: A single-center retrospective cohort study |
title | Optimal cutoffs of growth discordance for the risk of preeclampsia in twin pregnancies: A single-center retrospective cohort study |
title_full | Optimal cutoffs of growth discordance for the risk of preeclampsia in twin pregnancies: A single-center retrospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Optimal cutoffs of growth discordance for the risk of preeclampsia in twin pregnancies: A single-center retrospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimal cutoffs of growth discordance for the risk of preeclampsia in twin pregnancies: A single-center retrospective cohort study |
title_short | Optimal cutoffs of growth discordance for the risk of preeclampsia in twin pregnancies: A single-center retrospective cohort study |
title_sort | optimal cutoffs of growth discordance for the risk of preeclampsia in twin pregnancies: a single-center retrospective cohort study |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9884673/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36727028 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.1073729 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhujie optimalcutoffsofgrowthdiscordancefortheriskofpreeclampsiaintwinpregnanciesasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT anping optimalcutoffsofgrowthdiscordancefortheriskofpreeclampsiaintwinpregnanciesasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT zhaohuanqiang optimalcutoffsofgrowthdiscordancefortheriskofpreeclampsiaintwinpregnanciesasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT zhaoying optimalcutoffsofgrowthdiscordancefortheriskofpreeclampsiaintwinpregnanciesasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT zhoujizi optimalcutoffsofgrowthdiscordancefortheriskofpreeclampsiaintwinpregnanciesasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT zhouqiongjie optimalcutoffsofgrowthdiscordancefortheriskofpreeclampsiaintwinpregnanciesasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT lixiaotian optimalcutoffsofgrowthdiscordancefortheriskofpreeclampsiaintwinpregnanciesasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT xiongyu optimalcutoffsofgrowthdiscordancefortheriskofpreeclampsiaintwinpregnanciesasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy |