Cargando…
Relationship between intersectionality and cancer inequalities: a scoping review protocol
INTRODUCTION: Persistent inequalities in cancer care and cancer outcomes exist within and between countries. However, the evidence pertaining to the root causes driving cancer inequalities is mixed. This may be explained by the inadequate attention paid to experiences of patients with cancer living...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9884887/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36707112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066637 |
_version_ | 1784879808960790528 |
---|---|
author | Estupiñán Fdez de Mesa, Mar Marcu, Afrodita Ream, Emma Whitaker, Katriina L |
author_facet | Estupiñán Fdez de Mesa, Mar Marcu, Afrodita Ream, Emma Whitaker, Katriina L |
author_sort | Estupiñán Fdez de Mesa, Mar |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Persistent inequalities in cancer care and cancer outcomes exist within and between countries. However, the evidence pertaining to the root causes driving cancer inequalities is mixed. This may be explained by the inadequate attention paid to experiences of patients with cancer living at the intersection of multiple social categories (eg, social class, ethnicity). This is supported by the intersectionality framework. This framework offers an alternative lens through which to analyse and understand how these interlocking systems of oppression uniquely shape the experiences of patients with cancer and drive inequalities. In this protocol, we outline a scoping review that will systematically map what is known about the relationship between intersectionality and inequalities in care experience and cancer outcomes of patients with cancer; and to determine how the intersectionality framework has been applied in studies across the cancer care pathway and across countries. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will be guided by Arksey and O’Malley’s, and Levac et al’s frameworks for scoping reviews. We will identify and map the evidence on cancer inequalities and intersectionality from 1989 to present date. Electronic databases (EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL, Medline, Web of Science, ProQuest) and a systematic search strategy using a combination of keywords and Boolean operators AND/OR will be used to identify relevant studies. Screening of eligible papers and data extraction will be conducted by two independent reviewers, and disagreements resolved by discussion with the research team. We will use an iterative process to data charting using a piloted form. Findings will be collated into a narrative report. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required since data used are from publicly available secondary sources. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conferences and stakeholder meetings. Further, findings will inform the next phases of a multistage research project aimed at understanding inequalities among patients with breast cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9884887 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98848872023-01-31 Relationship between intersectionality and cancer inequalities: a scoping review protocol Estupiñán Fdez de Mesa, Mar Marcu, Afrodita Ream, Emma Whitaker, Katriina L BMJ Open Oncology INTRODUCTION: Persistent inequalities in cancer care and cancer outcomes exist within and between countries. However, the evidence pertaining to the root causes driving cancer inequalities is mixed. This may be explained by the inadequate attention paid to experiences of patients with cancer living at the intersection of multiple social categories (eg, social class, ethnicity). This is supported by the intersectionality framework. This framework offers an alternative lens through which to analyse and understand how these interlocking systems of oppression uniquely shape the experiences of patients with cancer and drive inequalities. In this protocol, we outline a scoping review that will systematically map what is known about the relationship between intersectionality and inequalities in care experience and cancer outcomes of patients with cancer; and to determine how the intersectionality framework has been applied in studies across the cancer care pathway and across countries. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will be guided by Arksey and O’Malley’s, and Levac et al’s frameworks for scoping reviews. We will identify and map the evidence on cancer inequalities and intersectionality from 1989 to present date. Electronic databases (EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL, Medline, Web of Science, ProQuest) and a systematic search strategy using a combination of keywords and Boolean operators AND/OR will be used to identify relevant studies. Screening of eligible papers and data extraction will be conducted by two independent reviewers, and disagreements resolved by discussion with the research team. We will use an iterative process to data charting using a piloted form. Findings will be collated into a narrative report. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required since data used are from publicly available secondary sources. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conferences and stakeholder meetings. Further, findings will inform the next phases of a multistage research project aimed at understanding inequalities among patients with breast cancer. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9884887/ /pubmed/36707112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066637 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Oncology Estupiñán Fdez de Mesa, Mar Marcu, Afrodita Ream, Emma Whitaker, Katriina L Relationship between intersectionality and cancer inequalities: a scoping review protocol |
title | Relationship between intersectionality and cancer inequalities: a scoping review protocol |
title_full | Relationship between intersectionality and cancer inequalities: a scoping review protocol |
title_fullStr | Relationship between intersectionality and cancer inequalities: a scoping review protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Relationship between intersectionality and cancer inequalities: a scoping review protocol |
title_short | Relationship between intersectionality and cancer inequalities: a scoping review protocol |
title_sort | relationship between intersectionality and cancer inequalities: a scoping review protocol |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9884887/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36707112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066637 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT estupinanfdezdemesamar relationshipbetweenintersectionalityandcancerinequalitiesascopingreviewprotocol AT marcuafrodita relationshipbetweenintersectionalityandcancerinequalitiesascopingreviewprotocol AT reamemma relationshipbetweenintersectionalityandcancerinequalitiesascopingreviewprotocol AT whitakerkatriinal relationshipbetweenintersectionalityandcancerinequalitiesascopingreviewprotocol |