Cargando…

Impact of a clinical decision support system on paediatric drug dose prescribing: a randomised within-subject simulation trial

BACKGROUND: Drug dosing errors are among the most frequent causes of preventable harm in paediatrics. Due to the complexity of paediatric pharmacotherapy and the working conditions in healthcare, it is not surprising that human factor is a well-described source of error. Thus, a clinical decision su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Higi, Lukas, Schmitt, Raffael, Käser, Karin, Wälti, Monika, Grotzer, Michael, Vonbach, Priska
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9884891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36697035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2022-001726
_version_ 1784879809932820480
author Higi, Lukas
Schmitt, Raffael
Käser, Karin
Wälti, Monika
Grotzer, Michael
Vonbach, Priska
author_facet Higi, Lukas
Schmitt, Raffael
Käser, Karin
Wälti, Monika
Grotzer, Michael
Vonbach, Priska
author_sort Higi, Lukas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Drug dosing errors are among the most frequent causes of preventable harm in paediatrics. Due to the complexity of paediatric pharmacotherapy and the working conditions in healthcare, it is not surprising that human factor is a well-described source of error. Thus, a clinical decision support system (CDSS) that supports healthcare professionals (HCP) during the dose prescribing step provides a promising strategy for error prevention. METHODS: The aim of the trial was to simulate the dose derivation step during the prescribing process. HCPs were asked to derive dosages for 18 hypothetical patient cases. We compared the CDSS PEDeDose, which provides a built-in dose calculator to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) used together with a pocket calculator in a randomised within-subject trial. We assessed the number of dose calculation errors and the time needed for calculation. Additionally, the effect of PEDeDose without using the built-in calculator but with a pocket calculator instead was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 52 HCPs participated in the trial. The OR for an erroneous dosage using the CDSS as compared with the SmPC with pocket calculator was 0.08 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.36, p<0.001). Thus, the odds of an error were 12 times higher while using the SmPC. Furthermore, there was a 45% (95% CI 39% to 51%, p<0.001) time reduction when the dosage was derived using the CDSS. The exploratory analysis revealed that using only PEDeDose but without the built-in calculator did not substantially reduce errors. CONCLUSION: Our results provide robust evidence that the use of the CDSS is safer and more efficient than manual dose derivation in paediatrics. Interestingly, only consulting a dosing database was not sufficient to substantially reduce errors. We are confident the CDSS PEDeDose ensures a higher safety and speeds up the prescribing process in practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9884891
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98848912023-01-31 Impact of a clinical decision support system on paediatric drug dose prescribing: a randomised within-subject simulation trial Higi, Lukas Schmitt, Raffael Käser, Karin Wälti, Monika Grotzer, Michael Vonbach, Priska BMJ Paediatr Open Pharmacology BACKGROUND: Drug dosing errors are among the most frequent causes of preventable harm in paediatrics. Due to the complexity of paediatric pharmacotherapy and the working conditions in healthcare, it is not surprising that human factor is a well-described source of error. Thus, a clinical decision support system (CDSS) that supports healthcare professionals (HCP) during the dose prescribing step provides a promising strategy for error prevention. METHODS: The aim of the trial was to simulate the dose derivation step during the prescribing process. HCPs were asked to derive dosages for 18 hypothetical patient cases. We compared the CDSS PEDeDose, which provides a built-in dose calculator to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) used together with a pocket calculator in a randomised within-subject trial. We assessed the number of dose calculation errors and the time needed for calculation. Additionally, the effect of PEDeDose without using the built-in calculator but with a pocket calculator instead was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 52 HCPs participated in the trial. The OR for an erroneous dosage using the CDSS as compared with the SmPC with pocket calculator was 0.08 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.36, p<0.001). Thus, the odds of an error were 12 times higher while using the SmPC. Furthermore, there was a 45% (95% CI 39% to 51%, p<0.001) time reduction when the dosage was derived using the CDSS. The exploratory analysis revealed that using only PEDeDose but without the built-in calculator did not substantially reduce errors. CONCLUSION: Our results provide robust evidence that the use of the CDSS is safer and more efficient than manual dose derivation in paediatrics. Interestingly, only consulting a dosing database was not sufficient to substantially reduce errors. We are confident the CDSS PEDeDose ensures a higher safety and speeds up the prescribing process in practice. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9884891/ /pubmed/36697035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2022-001726 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Higi, Lukas
Schmitt, Raffael
Käser, Karin
Wälti, Monika
Grotzer, Michael
Vonbach, Priska
Impact of a clinical decision support system on paediatric drug dose prescribing: a randomised within-subject simulation trial
title Impact of a clinical decision support system on paediatric drug dose prescribing: a randomised within-subject simulation trial
title_full Impact of a clinical decision support system on paediatric drug dose prescribing: a randomised within-subject simulation trial
title_fullStr Impact of a clinical decision support system on paediatric drug dose prescribing: a randomised within-subject simulation trial
title_full_unstemmed Impact of a clinical decision support system on paediatric drug dose prescribing: a randomised within-subject simulation trial
title_short Impact of a clinical decision support system on paediatric drug dose prescribing: a randomised within-subject simulation trial
title_sort impact of a clinical decision support system on paediatric drug dose prescribing: a randomised within-subject simulation trial
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9884891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36697035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2022-001726
work_keys_str_mv AT higilukas impactofaclinicaldecisionsupportsystemonpaediatricdrugdoseprescribingarandomisedwithinsubjectsimulationtrial
AT schmittraffael impactofaclinicaldecisionsupportsystemonpaediatricdrugdoseprescribingarandomisedwithinsubjectsimulationtrial
AT kaserkarin impactofaclinicaldecisionsupportsystemonpaediatricdrugdoseprescribingarandomisedwithinsubjectsimulationtrial
AT waltimonika impactofaclinicaldecisionsupportsystemonpaediatricdrugdoseprescribingarandomisedwithinsubjectsimulationtrial
AT grotzermichael impactofaclinicaldecisionsupportsystemonpaediatricdrugdoseprescribingarandomisedwithinsubjectsimulationtrial
AT vonbachpriska impactofaclinicaldecisionsupportsystemonpaediatricdrugdoseprescribingarandomisedwithinsubjectsimulationtrial