Cargando…
Clinical comparison of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy and unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy for single-level lumbar disc herniation
PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcomes of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) and unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy (UBE) for the treatment of single-level lumbar disc herniation (LDH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2020 to November 2021, 62 patients with single...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9884965/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36726945 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1107883 |
_version_ | 1784879825970790400 |
---|---|
author | Cheng, Xiaokang Bao, Beixi Wu, Yuxuan Cheng, Yuanpei Xu, Chunyang Ye, Yang Dou, Chentao Chen, Bin Yan, Hui Tang, Jiaguang |
author_facet | Cheng, Xiaokang Bao, Beixi Wu, Yuxuan Cheng, Yuanpei Xu, Chunyang Ye, Yang Dou, Chentao Chen, Bin Yan, Hui Tang, Jiaguang |
author_sort | Cheng, Xiaokang |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcomes of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) and unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy (UBE) for the treatment of single-level lumbar disc herniation (LDH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2020 to November 2021, 62 patients with single-level LDH were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent spinal surgeries at the Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University and Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University. Among them, 30 patients were treated with UBE, and 32 were treated with PTED. The patients were followed up for at least one year. Patient demographics and perioperative outcomes were reviewed before and after surgery. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS) for back pain and leg pain, and modified MacNab criteria were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes. x-ray examinations were performed one year after surgery to assess the stability of the lumbar spine. RESULTS: The mean ages in the UBE and PTED groups were 46.7 years and 48.0 years, respectively. Compared to the UBE group, the PTED group had better VAS scores for back pain at 1 and 7 days after surgery (3.06 ± 0.80 vs. 4.03 ± 0.81, P < 0.05; 2.81 ± 0.60 vs. 3.70 ± 0.79, P < 0.05). The UBE and PTED groups demonstrated significant improvements in the VAS score for leg pain and ODI score, and no significant differences were found between the groups at any time after the first month (P > 0.05). Although the good-to-excellent rate of the modified MacNab criteria in the UBE group was similar to that in the PTED group (86.7% vs. 87.5%, P > 0.05), PTED was advantageous in terms of the operation time, estimated blood loss, incision length, and length of postoperative hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Both UBE and PTED have favorable outcomes in patients with single-level LDH. However, PTED is superior to UBE in terms of short-term postoperative back pain relief and perioperative quality of life. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9884965 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98849652023-01-31 Clinical comparison of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy and unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy for single-level lumbar disc herniation Cheng, Xiaokang Bao, Beixi Wu, Yuxuan Cheng, Yuanpei Xu, Chunyang Ye, Yang Dou, Chentao Chen, Bin Yan, Hui Tang, Jiaguang Front Surg Surgery PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcomes of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) and unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy (UBE) for the treatment of single-level lumbar disc herniation (LDH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2020 to November 2021, 62 patients with single-level LDH were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent spinal surgeries at the Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University and Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University. Among them, 30 patients were treated with UBE, and 32 were treated with PTED. The patients were followed up for at least one year. Patient demographics and perioperative outcomes were reviewed before and after surgery. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS) for back pain and leg pain, and modified MacNab criteria were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes. x-ray examinations were performed one year after surgery to assess the stability of the lumbar spine. RESULTS: The mean ages in the UBE and PTED groups were 46.7 years and 48.0 years, respectively. Compared to the UBE group, the PTED group had better VAS scores for back pain at 1 and 7 days after surgery (3.06 ± 0.80 vs. 4.03 ± 0.81, P < 0.05; 2.81 ± 0.60 vs. 3.70 ± 0.79, P < 0.05). The UBE and PTED groups demonstrated significant improvements in the VAS score for leg pain and ODI score, and no significant differences were found between the groups at any time after the first month (P > 0.05). Although the good-to-excellent rate of the modified MacNab criteria in the UBE group was similar to that in the PTED group (86.7% vs. 87.5%, P > 0.05), PTED was advantageous in terms of the operation time, estimated blood loss, incision length, and length of postoperative hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Both UBE and PTED have favorable outcomes in patients with single-level LDH. However, PTED is superior to UBE in terms of short-term postoperative back pain relief and perioperative quality of life. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9884965/ /pubmed/36726945 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1107883 Text en © 2023 Cheng, Bao, Wu, Cheng, Xu, Ye, Dou, Chen, Yan and Tang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Surgery Cheng, Xiaokang Bao, Beixi Wu, Yuxuan Cheng, Yuanpei Xu, Chunyang Ye, Yang Dou, Chentao Chen, Bin Yan, Hui Tang, Jiaguang Clinical comparison of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy and unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy for single-level lumbar disc herniation |
title | Clinical comparison of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy and unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy for single-level lumbar disc herniation |
title_full | Clinical comparison of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy and unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy for single-level lumbar disc herniation |
title_fullStr | Clinical comparison of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy and unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy for single-level lumbar disc herniation |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical comparison of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy and unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy for single-level lumbar disc herniation |
title_short | Clinical comparison of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy and unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy for single-level lumbar disc herniation |
title_sort | clinical comparison of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy and unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy for single-level lumbar disc herniation |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9884965/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36726945 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1107883 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chengxiaokang clinicalcomparisonofpercutaneoustransforaminalendoscopicdiscectomyandunilateralbiportalendoscopicdiscectomyforsinglelevellumbardischerniation AT baobeixi clinicalcomparisonofpercutaneoustransforaminalendoscopicdiscectomyandunilateralbiportalendoscopicdiscectomyforsinglelevellumbardischerniation AT wuyuxuan clinicalcomparisonofpercutaneoustransforaminalendoscopicdiscectomyandunilateralbiportalendoscopicdiscectomyforsinglelevellumbardischerniation AT chengyuanpei clinicalcomparisonofpercutaneoustransforaminalendoscopicdiscectomyandunilateralbiportalendoscopicdiscectomyforsinglelevellumbardischerniation AT xuchunyang clinicalcomparisonofpercutaneoustransforaminalendoscopicdiscectomyandunilateralbiportalendoscopicdiscectomyforsinglelevellumbardischerniation AT yeyang clinicalcomparisonofpercutaneoustransforaminalendoscopicdiscectomyandunilateralbiportalendoscopicdiscectomyforsinglelevellumbardischerniation AT douchentao clinicalcomparisonofpercutaneoustransforaminalendoscopicdiscectomyandunilateralbiportalendoscopicdiscectomyforsinglelevellumbardischerniation AT chenbin clinicalcomparisonofpercutaneoustransforaminalendoscopicdiscectomyandunilateralbiportalendoscopicdiscectomyforsinglelevellumbardischerniation AT yanhui clinicalcomparisonofpercutaneoustransforaminalendoscopicdiscectomyandunilateralbiportalendoscopicdiscectomyforsinglelevellumbardischerniation AT tangjiaguang clinicalcomparisonofpercutaneoustransforaminalendoscopicdiscectomyandunilateralbiportalendoscopicdiscectomyforsinglelevellumbardischerniation |