Cargando…

Corneal biomechanical characteristics following small incision lenticule extraction for myopia and astigmatism with 3 different cap thicknesses

BACKGROUND: The design of cap thickness for small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) plays a role in post-laser vision correction (post-LVC) corneal biomechanics. This study aimed to compare the corneal biomechanical characteristics following SMILE with different cap thicknesses of 110 μm, 120 μm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lv, Xiaotong, Zhang, Fengju, Song, Yanzheng, Zhai, Changbin, Guo, Ning, Lai, Lingbo, Xu, Yushan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9885585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36717828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-02786-8
_version_ 1784879959036133376
author Lv, Xiaotong
Zhang, Fengju
Song, Yanzheng
Zhai, Changbin
Guo, Ning
Lai, Lingbo
Xu, Yushan
author_facet Lv, Xiaotong
Zhang, Fengju
Song, Yanzheng
Zhai, Changbin
Guo, Ning
Lai, Lingbo
Xu, Yushan
author_sort Lv, Xiaotong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The design of cap thickness for small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) plays a role in post-laser vision correction (post-LVC) corneal biomechanics. This study aimed to compare the corneal biomechanical characteristics following SMILE with different cap thicknesses of 110 μm, 120 μm, and 130 μm for myopia and myopic astigmatism correction. METHODS: Seventy-five patients (146 eyes) who underwent SMILE with designed cap thickness of 110 μm, 120 μm, and 130 μm were recruited at the Eye Center of Beijing Tongren Hospital between August 2020 and November 2021. Visual acuity, refraction, and corneal biomechanical parameters were measured preoperatively, 1 week and 1, 3, 6 months postoperatively. One-way analysis of variances (ANOVA) with Bonferroni correction or Kruskal-Wallis test was performed to compare the parameters among different groups. Repeated-measures analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction or Friedman test was applied for comparing the parameters within different follow-up times. RESULTS: Uncorrected distance visual acuity of 110-μm group was better only at 1-week and 1-month postoperatively (P = 0.012, 0.037). There were no significant differences in spherical equivalent, nor in Corvis biomechanical index-laser vision correction (CBI-LVC). All the parameters reached stability at 3-month postoperatively. Integrated radius (IR) and deformation amplitude ratio 2 mm (DA ratio 2 mm) in 120-μm and 130-μm groups were higher than 110-μm group at 1-month postoperatively (P = 0.019, 0.002). So was Ambrósio relational thickness (ARTh) at 6-month postoperatively (P = 0.011). Stiffness parameter at applanation A1 (SP-A1), stress-strain index (SSI), biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure (bIOP) and central corneal thickness (CCT) were highest in 130-μm group, followed by 120-μm group, then 110-μm group at 3-month (P<0.001, P = 0.030, P = 0.027, P = 0.008) and 6-month (P<0.001, P = 0.002, P = 0.0023, P = 0.001) postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The corneal stiffness following SMILE was greatest with 130-μm cap, followed by 120-μm cap, then 110-μm cap. 130-μm cap might have advantages in terms of corneal biomechanics and retreatment option. The SMILE-designed protocol should be customized in practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12886-023-02786-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9885585
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98855852023-01-31 Corneal biomechanical characteristics following small incision lenticule extraction for myopia and astigmatism with 3 different cap thicknesses Lv, Xiaotong Zhang, Fengju Song, Yanzheng Zhai, Changbin Guo, Ning Lai, Lingbo Xu, Yushan BMC Ophthalmol Research BACKGROUND: The design of cap thickness for small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) plays a role in post-laser vision correction (post-LVC) corneal biomechanics. This study aimed to compare the corneal biomechanical characteristics following SMILE with different cap thicknesses of 110 μm, 120 μm, and 130 μm for myopia and myopic astigmatism correction. METHODS: Seventy-five patients (146 eyes) who underwent SMILE with designed cap thickness of 110 μm, 120 μm, and 130 μm were recruited at the Eye Center of Beijing Tongren Hospital between August 2020 and November 2021. Visual acuity, refraction, and corneal biomechanical parameters were measured preoperatively, 1 week and 1, 3, 6 months postoperatively. One-way analysis of variances (ANOVA) with Bonferroni correction or Kruskal-Wallis test was performed to compare the parameters among different groups. Repeated-measures analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction or Friedman test was applied for comparing the parameters within different follow-up times. RESULTS: Uncorrected distance visual acuity of 110-μm group was better only at 1-week and 1-month postoperatively (P = 0.012, 0.037). There were no significant differences in spherical equivalent, nor in Corvis biomechanical index-laser vision correction (CBI-LVC). All the parameters reached stability at 3-month postoperatively. Integrated radius (IR) and deformation amplitude ratio 2 mm (DA ratio 2 mm) in 120-μm and 130-μm groups were higher than 110-μm group at 1-month postoperatively (P = 0.019, 0.002). So was Ambrósio relational thickness (ARTh) at 6-month postoperatively (P = 0.011). Stiffness parameter at applanation A1 (SP-A1), stress-strain index (SSI), biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure (bIOP) and central corneal thickness (CCT) were highest in 130-μm group, followed by 120-μm group, then 110-μm group at 3-month (P<0.001, P = 0.030, P = 0.027, P = 0.008) and 6-month (P<0.001, P = 0.002, P = 0.0023, P = 0.001) postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The corneal stiffness following SMILE was greatest with 130-μm cap, followed by 120-μm cap, then 110-μm cap. 130-μm cap might have advantages in terms of corneal biomechanics and retreatment option. The SMILE-designed protocol should be customized in practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12886-023-02786-8. BioMed Central 2023-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9885585/ /pubmed/36717828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-02786-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Lv, Xiaotong
Zhang, Fengju
Song, Yanzheng
Zhai, Changbin
Guo, Ning
Lai, Lingbo
Xu, Yushan
Corneal biomechanical characteristics following small incision lenticule extraction for myopia and astigmatism with 3 different cap thicknesses
title Corneal biomechanical characteristics following small incision lenticule extraction for myopia and astigmatism with 3 different cap thicknesses
title_full Corneal biomechanical characteristics following small incision lenticule extraction for myopia and astigmatism with 3 different cap thicknesses
title_fullStr Corneal biomechanical characteristics following small incision lenticule extraction for myopia and astigmatism with 3 different cap thicknesses
title_full_unstemmed Corneal biomechanical characteristics following small incision lenticule extraction for myopia and astigmatism with 3 different cap thicknesses
title_short Corneal biomechanical characteristics following small incision lenticule extraction for myopia and astigmatism with 3 different cap thicknesses
title_sort corneal biomechanical characteristics following small incision lenticule extraction for myopia and astigmatism with 3 different cap thicknesses
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9885585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36717828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-02786-8
work_keys_str_mv AT lvxiaotong cornealbiomechanicalcharacteristicsfollowingsmallincisionlenticuleextractionformyopiaandastigmatismwith3differentcapthicknesses
AT zhangfengju cornealbiomechanicalcharacteristicsfollowingsmallincisionlenticuleextractionformyopiaandastigmatismwith3differentcapthicknesses
AT songyanzheng cornealbiomechanicalcharacteristicsfollowingsmallincisionlenticuleextractionformyopiaandastigmatismwith3differentcapthicknesses
AT zhaichangbin cornealbiomechanicalcharacteristicsfollowingsmallincisionlenticuleextractionformyopiaandastigmatismwith3differentcapthicknesses
AT guoning cornealbiomechanicalcharacteristicsfollowingsmallincisionlenticuleextractionformyopiaandastigmatismwith3differentcapthicknesses
AT lailingbo cornealbiomechanicalcharacteristicsfollowingsmallincisionlenticuleextractionformyopiaandastigmatismwith3differentcapthicknesses
AT xuyushan cornealbiomechanicalcharacteristicsfollowingsmallincisionlenticuleextractionformyopiaandastigmatismwith3differentcapthicknesses