Cargando…

Prognostic significance and risk factors for pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastasis in type I and type II ovarian cancer: a large population-based database analysis

BACKGROUND: To compare the prognosis of lymphatic metastasis in type I and type II epithelial ovarian cancer (OC) and to identify the risk factors for pelvic lymph node metastases (PLNs) and para-aortic lymph node metastases (PALNs). METHODS: Patients diagnosed with epithelial OC were collected from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Hailin, Wang, Jieyu, Wu, Beibei, li, Jun, Chen, Ruifang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9885671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36717897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-023-01102-8
_version_ 1784879977781526528
author Yu, Hailin
Wang, Jieyu
Wu, Beibei
li, Jun
Chen, Ruifang
author_facet Yu, Hailin
Wang, Jieyu
Wu, Beibei
li, Jun
Chen, Ruifang
author_sort Yu, Hailin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare the prognosis of lymphatic metastasis in type I and type II epithelial ovarian cancer (OC) and to identify the risk factors for pelvic lymph node metastases (PLNs) and para-aortic lymph node metastases (PALNs). METHODS: Patients diagnosed with epithelial OC were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to identify independent predictors of survival. RESULTS: A total of 11,275 patients with OC were enrolled, including 31.2% with type I and 68.8% with type II. Type II and high tumour stage were risk factors for lymph node involvement (p < 0.05). The overall rate of lymph node metastasis in type I was 11.8%, and that in type II was 36.7%. In the type I group, the lymph node metastasis rates in stages T1, T2, T3 and T(X)M(1) were 3.2%, 14.5%, 40.4% and 50.0%, respectively. In the type II group, these rates were 6.4%, 20.4%, 54.1% and 61.1%, respectively. Age and tumour size had little effect on lymph node metastasis, and grade 3 was not always a risk factor. For the type I group, the 10-year CSS rates of LN(-), PLN( +), PALN( +), and PLN + PALN( +) were 80.6%, 46.6%, 36.3%, and 32.3%, respectively. The prognosis of PLN ( +) was better than that of PALN ( +) in the type I group (p > 0.05). For the type II group, the 10-year CSS rates of LN(-), PLN( +), PALN( +), and PLN + PALN( +) were 55.6%, 18.5%, 25.7%, and 18.2%, respectively. PALN ( +) had a significantly better prognosis than PLN ( +) in the type II group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical characteristics and prognoses of patients with type I and type II OC differed greatly. Patients with type II and higher tumour stages had poorer prognoses. Type I with PALN metastasis and type II with PLN metastasis indicated a worse prognosis. Patients with stage TI did not require lymph node dissection, especially in the type I group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9885671
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98856712023-01-31 Prognostic significance and risk factors for pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastasis in type I and type II ovarian cancer: a large population-based database analysis Yu, Hailin Wang, Jieyu Wu, Beibei li, Jun Chen, Ruifang J Ovarian Res Research BACKGROUND: To compare the prognosis of lymphatic metastasis in type I and type II epithelial ovarian cancer (OC) and to identify the risk factors for pelvic lymph node metastases (PLNs) and para-aortic lymph node metastases (PALNs). METHODS: Patients diagnosed with epithelial OC were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to identify independent predictors of survival. RESULTS: A total of 11,275 patients with OC were enrolled, including 31.2% with type I and 68.8% with type II. Type II and high tumour stage were risk factors for lymph node involvement (p < 0.05). The overall rate of lymph node metastasis in type I was 11.8%, and that in type II was 36.7%. In the type I group, the lymph node metastasis rates in stages T1, T2, T3 and T(X)M(1) were 3.2%, 14.5%, 40.4% and 50.0%, respectively. In the type II group, these rates were 6.4%, 20.4%, 54.1% and 61.1%, respectively. Age and tumour size had little effect on lymph node metastasis, and grade 3 was not always a risk factor. For the type I group, the 10-year CSS rates of LN(-), PLN( +), PALN( +), and PLN + PALN( +) were 80.6%, 46.6%, 36.3%, and 32.3%, respectively. The prognosis of PLN ( +) was better than that of PALN ( +) in the type I group (p > 0.05). For the type II group, the 10-year CSS rates of LN(-), PLN( +), PALN( +), and PLN + PALN( +) were 55.6%, 18.5%, 25.7%, and 18.2%, respectively. PALN ( +) had a significantly better prognosis than PLN ( +) in the type II group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical characteristics and prognoses of patients with type I and type II OC differed greatly. Patients with type II and higher tumour stages had poorer prognoses. Type I with PALN metastasis and type II with PLN metastasis indicated a worse prognosis. Patients with stage TI did not require lymph node dissection, especially in the type I group. BioMed Central 2023-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9885671/ /pubmed/36717897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-023-01102-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Yu, Hailin
Wang, Jieyu
Wu, Beibei
li, Jun
Chen, Ruifang
Prognostic significance and risk factors for pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastasis in type I and type II ovarian cancer: a large population-based database analysis
title Prognostic significance and risk factors for pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastasis in type I and type II ovarian cancer: a large population-based database analysis
title_full Prognostic significance and risk factors for pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastasis in type I and type II ovarian cancer: a large population-based database analysis
title_fullStr Prognostic significance and risk factors for pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastasis in type I and type II ovarian cancer: a large population-based database analysis
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic significance and risk factors for pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastasis in type I and type II ovarian cancer: a large population-based database analysis
title_short Prognostic significance and risk factors for pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastasis in type I and type II ovarian cancer: a large population-based database analysis
title_sort prognostic significance and risk factors for pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastasis in type i and type ii ovarian cancer: a large population-based database analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9885671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36717897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-023-01102-8
work_keys_str_mv AT yuhailin prognosticsignificanceandriskfactorsforpelvicandparaaorticlymphnodemetastasisintypeiandtypeiiovariancanceralargepopulationbaseddatabaseanalysis
AT wangjieyu prognosticsignificanceandriskfactorsforpelvicandparaaorticlymphnodemetastasisintypeiandtypeiiovariancanceralargepopulationbaseddatabaseanalysis
AT wubeibei prognosticsignificanceandriskfactorsforpelvicandparaaorticlymphnodemetastasisintypeiandtypeiiovariancanceralargepopulationbaseddatabaseanalysis
AT lijun prognosticsignificanceandriskfactorsforpelvicandparaaorticlymphnodemetastasisintypeiandtypeiiovariancanceralargepopulationbaseddatabaseanalysis
AT chenruifang prognosticsignificanceandriskfactorsforpelvicandparaaorticlymphnodemetastasisintypeiandtypeiiovariancanceralargepopulationbaseddatabaseanalysis