Cargando…

Validation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire for Assessing Patient Safety Culture in Critical Care Settings of Three Selected Ugandan Hospitals

BACKGROUND: The safety attitudes questionnaire (SAQ) short form (2006) is important for assessing patient safety culture in clinical environments. However, little is known about its validity and applicability in Uganda. This study validated the SAQ short form (2006) for use in assessing patient safe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Atukwatse, Joseph, Niyonzima, Vallence, Asher Aliga, Cliff, Nakandi Serwadda, Jalia, Nankunda, Rosemary, Nakiganda, Catherine, Komugabe, Peninah, Nantongo, Hanifah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9885870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36727107
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DHPS.S389978
_version_ 1784880017879072768
author Atukwatse, Joseph
Niyonzima, Vallence
Asher Aliga, Cliff
Nakandi Serwadda, Jalia
Nankunda, Rosemary
Nakiganda, Catherine
Komugabe, Peninah
Nantongo, Hanifah
author_facet Atukwatse, Joseph
Niyonzima, Vallence
Asher Aliga, Cliff
Nakandi Serwadda, Jalia
Nankunda, Rosemary
Nakiganda, Catherine
Komugabe, Peninah
Nantongo, Hanifah
author_sort Atukwatse, Joseph
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The safety attitudes questionnaire (SAQ) short form (2006) is important for assessing patient safety culture in clinical environments. However, little is known about its validity and applicability in Uganda. This study validated the SAQ short form (2006) for use in assessing patient safety culture in critical care settings of hospitals in the Ugandan context. METHODS: Using a sequential exploratory mixed-methods research design, the face, content and construct validity for the SAQ short form (2006) was assessed in a multi-phased approach. A panel of eight (8) purposively selected experts assessed the face and content validity in rounds 1 and 2, respectively, while construct validity was assessed in round 3 using data from a cross-sectional survey of 256 frontline health workers in critical care settings of the selected hospitals. Analysis of survey data followed confirmatory factor analysis. Cronbach’s alpha examined internal reliability. RESULTS: Of the 36 items in the tool’s original version, 33 were rated clear, with a score of 100% on face validity. The use of contextual vocabulary and formatting issues arose as concerns. The S-CVI/(Ave) was 100%, and S-CVI/(UA) was 86.1%. Four new items added on effective communication as another dimension of patient safety culture. The survey had KMO=0.8605, the a priori-based model had a scale Cronbach’s alpha=0.8881, with unsatisfactory goodness of fit (RMSEA=0.051, 90% CI: 0.044–0.057, pclose=0.427; chi-square=694.28, p <0.001; CFI=0.884, TLI=0.871). The modified final model had a scale Cronbach’s alpha =0.8967 and satisfactory goodness of fit (RMSEA=0.030, 90% CI: 0.019–0.039, pclose=1.000; chi-square=424.98, p=0.002; CFI=0.966, TLI=0.960). CONCLUSION: In the tool’s original form, the face validity was lacking despite satisfactory scores on item clarity. Content validity was adequate, while construct validity required modifications in construct specifications. Reliability was adequate before and after specification modifications. The modified version has adequate psychometric properties for Uganda.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9885870
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98858702023-01-31 Validation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire for Assessing Patient Safety Culture in Critical Care Settings of Three Selected Ugandan Hospitals Atukwatse, Joseph Niyonzima, Vallence Asher Aliga, Cliff Nakandi Serwadda, Jalia Nankunda, Rosemary Nakiganda, Catherine Komugabe, Peninah Nantongo, Hanifah Drug Healthc Patient Saf Original Research BACKGROUND: The safety attitudes questionnaire (SAQ) short form (2006) is important for assessing patient safety culture in clinical environments. However, little is known about its validity and applicability in Uganda. This study validated the SAQ short form (2006) for use in assessing patient safety culture in critical care settings of hospitals in the Ugandan context. METHODS: Using a sequential exploratory mixed-methods research design, the face, content and construct validity for the SAQ short form (2006) was assessed in a multi-phased approach. A panel of eight (8) purposively selected experts assessed the face and content validity in rounds 1 and 2, respectively, while construct validity was assessed in round 3 using data from a cross-sectional survey of 256 frontline health workers in critical care settings of the selected hospitals. Analysis of survey data followed confirmatory factor analysis. Cronbach’s alpha examined internal reliability. RESULTS: Of the 36 items in the tool’s original version, 33 were rated clear, with a score of 100% on face validity. The use of contextual vocabulary and formatting issues arose as concerns. The S-CVI/(Ave) was 100%, and S-CVI/(UA) was 86.1%. Four new items added on effective communication as another dimension of patient safety culture. The survey had KMO=0.8605, the a priori-based model had a scale Cronbach’s alpha=0.8881, with unsatisfactory goodness of fit (RMSEA=0.051, 90% CI: 0.044–0.057, pclose=0.427; chi-square=694.28, p <0.001; CFI=0.884, TLI=0.871). The modified final model had a scale Cronbach’s alpha =0.8967 and satisfactory goodness of fit (RMSEA=0.030, 90% CI: 0.019–0.039, pclose=1.000; chi-square=424.98, p=0.002; CFI=0.966, TLI=0.960). CONCLUSION: In the tool’s original form, the face validity was lacking despite satisfactory scores on item clarity. Content validity was adequate, while construct validity required modifications in construct specifications. Reliability was adequate before and after specification modifications. The modified version has adequate psychometric properties for Uganda. Dove 2023-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9885870/ /pubmed/36727107 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DHPS.S389978 Text en © 2023 Atukwatse et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Atukwatse, Joseph
Niyonzima, Vallence
Asher Aliga, Cliff
Nakandi Serwadda, Jalia
Nankunda, Rosemary
Nakiganda, Catherine
Komugabe, Peninah
Nantongo, Hanifah
Validation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire for Assessing Patient Safety Culture in Critical Care Settings of Three Selected Ugandan Hospitals
title Validation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire for Assessing Patient Safety Culture in Critical Care Settings of Three Selected Ugandan Hospitals
title_full Validation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire for Assessing Patient Safety Culture in Critical Care Settings of Three Selected Ugandan Hospitals
title_fullStr Validation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire for Assessing Patient Safety Culture in Critical Care Settings of Three Selected Ugandan Hospitals
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire for Assessing Patient Safety Culture in Critical Care Settings of Three Selected Ugandan Hospitals
title_short Validation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire for Assessing Patient Safety Culture in Critical Care Settings of Three Selected Ugandan Hospitals
title_sort validation of the safety attitudes questionnaire for assessing patient safety culture in critical care settings of three selected ugandan hospitals
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9885870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36727107
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DHPS.S389978
work_keys_str_mv AT atukwatsejoseph validationofthesafetyattitudesquestionnaireforassessingpatientsafetycultureincriticalcaresettingsofthreeselectedugandanhospitals
AT niyonzimavallence validationofthesafetyattitudesquestionnaireforassessingpatientsafetycultureincriticalcaresettingsofthreeselectedugandanhospitals
AT asheraligacliff validationofthesafetyattitudesquestionnaireforassessingpatientsafetycultureincriticalcaresettingsofthreeselectedugandanhospitals
AT nakandiserwaddajalia validationofthesafetyattitudesquestionnaireforassessingpatientsafetycultureincriticalcaresettingsofthreeselectedugandanhospitals
AT nankundarosemary validationofthesafetyattitudesquestionnaireforassessingpatientsafetycultureincriticalcaresettingsofthreeselectedugandanhospitals
AT nakigandacatherine validationofthesafetyattitudesquestionnaireforassessingpatientsafetycultureincriticalcaresettingsofthreeselectedugandanhospitals
AT komugabepeninah validationofthesafetyattitudesquestionnaireforassessingpatientsafetycultureincriticalcaresettingsofthreeselectedugandanhospitals
AT nantongohanifah validationofthesafetyattitudesquestionnaireforassessingpatientsafetycultureincriticalcaresettingsofthreeselectedugandanhospitals