Cargando…

Predictors for response to electronic patient-reported outcomes in routine care in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective cohort study

Routine collection of electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) can improve clinical care. However, a low response rate may counteract the benefits. To optimize adoption, the aim of this study was to investigate which patient factors and/or timing of the invitation predicted response to ePROs sen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wiegel, Jimmy, Seppen, Bart F., Nurmohamed, Michael T., ter Wee, Marieke M., Bos, Wouter H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9885920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36715728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-023-05278-6
_version_ 1784880027505000448
author Wiegel, Jimmy
Seppen, Bart F.
Nurmohamed, Michael T.
ter Wee, Marieke M.
Bos, Wouter H.
author_facet Wiegel, Jimmy
Seppen, Bart F.
Nurmohamed, Michael T.
ter Wee, Marieke M.
Bos, Wouter H.
author_sort Wiegel, Jimmy
collection PubMed
description Routine collection of electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) can improve clinical care. However, a low response rate may counteract the benefits. To optimize adoption, the aim of this study was to investigate which patient factors and/or timing of the invitation predicted response to ePROs sent prior to consultations in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. We performed a retrospective database study with clinical data collected as part of usual care from the electronic medical records at Reade Amsterdam. The dataset comprised the email invitations to complete the ePRO sent prior to consultation. Multiple patient factors and factors defining the timing of the invitation were investigated if they predicted response to the ePRO through a multivariable logistic generalized estimating equation analysis. In total, 17.070 ePRO invitations were sent to 3194 patients (mean age 60 (SD 14), 74% female), of which 40% was completed. Patients between 55 and 73 years (OR 1.39, 95%CI 1.09–1.77) and with higher social economic status (SES) (OR 1.51, 95%CI 1.22–1.88) had significantly higher odds for completing the ePRO, while patients living in an urban area had lower odds (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.62–0.76). In year 4 after implementation, the OR was increased to 3.69 (95% CI 2.91–4.90). The implementation of ePROs in daily clinical practice needs improvement since 40% of the ePROs sent prior to consultations were completed. Patients that had higher odds to report the next ePRO were between the age of 55–73, had a higher socio-economic status, and were residents in a rural area. The adoption of reporting the PRO increased over time, but the timing of the prompt did not predict response. Additional research is needed to understand ePRO completion, especially for patients with lower socio-economic status. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00296-023-05278-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9885920
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98859202023-01-30 Predictors for response to electronic patient-reported outcomes in routine care in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective cohort study Wiegel, Jimmy Seppen, Bart F. Nurmohamed, Michael T. ter Wee, Marieke M. Bos, Wouter H. Rheumatol Int Cohort Studies Routine collection of electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) can improve clinical care. However, a low response rate may counteract the benefits. To optimize adoption, the aim of this study was to investigate which patient factors and/or timing of the invitation predicted response to ePROs sent prior to consultations in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. We performed a retrospective database study with clinical data collected as part of usual care from the electronic medical records at Reade Amsterdam. The dataset comprised the email invitations to complete the ePRO sent prior to consultation. Multiple patient factors and factors defining the timing of the invitation were investigated if they predicted response to the ePRO through a multivariable logistic generalized estimating equation analysis. In total, 17.070 ePRO invitations were sent to 3194 patients (mean age 60 (SD 14), 74% female), of which 40% was completed. Patients between 55 and 73 years (OR 1.39, 95%CI 1.09–1.77) and with higher social economic status (SES) (OR 1.51, 95%CI 1.22–1.88) had significantly higher odds for completing the ePRO, while patients living in an urban area had lower odds (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.62–0.76). In year 4 after implementation, the OR was increased to 3.69 (95% CI 2.91–4.90). The implementation of ePROs in daily clinical practice needs improvement since 40% of the ePROs sent prior to consultations were completed. Patients that had higher odds to report the next ePRO were between the age of 55–73, had a higher socio-economic status, and were residents in a rural area. The adoption of reporting the PRO increased over time, but the timing of the prompt did not predict response. Additional research is needed to understand ePRO completion, especially for patients with lower socio-economic status. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00296-023-05278-6. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-01-30 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9885920/ /pubmed/36715728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-023-05278-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Cohort Studies
Wiegel, Jimmy
Seppen, Bart F.
Nurmohamed, Michael T.
ter Wee, Marieke M.
Bos, Wouter H.
Predictors for response to electronic patient-reported outcomes in routine care in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective cohort study
title Predictors for response to electronic patient-reported outcomes in routine care in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Predictors for response to electronic patient-reported outcomes in routine care in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Predictors for response to electronic patient-reported outcomes in routine care in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Predictors for response to electronic patient-reported outcomes in routine care in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Predictors for response to electronic patient-reported outcomes in routine care in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort predictors for response to electronic patient-reported outcomes in routine care in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective cohort study
topic Cohort Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9885920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36715728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-023-05278-6
work_keys_str_mv AT wiegeljimmy predictorsforresponsetoelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesinroutinecareinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT seppenbartf predictorsforresponsetoelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesinroutinecareinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT nurmohamedmichaelt predictorsforresponsetoelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesinroutinecareinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT terweemariekem predictorsforresponsetoelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesinroutinecareinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT boswouterh predictorsforresponsetoelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesinroutinecareinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisaretrospectivecohortstudy