Cargando…

The ‘critical trochanter angle’ does not show superiority over the CCD angle in predicting varus stem alignment in cementless short-stem total hip arthroplasty

PURPOSE: Varus positioning of the femoral stem can affect the hip offset (HO). The critical trochanter angle (CTA) was introduced in 2019 as a novel geometric angle, to predict varus stem alignment in cementless straight stem THA. The aim of this study was to evaluate the applicability of the CTA as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luger, Matthias, Feldler, Sandra, Pisecky, Lorenz, Allerstorfer, Jakob, Gotterbarm, Tobias, Klasan, Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9886626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35020039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04340-5
_version_ 1784880170869456896
author Luger, Matthias
Feldler, Sandra
Pisecky, Lorenz
Allerstorfer, Jakob
Gotterbarm, Tobias
Klasan, Antonio
author_facet Luger, Matthias
Feldler, Sandra
Pisecky, Lorenz
Allerstorfer, Jakob
Gotterbarm, Tobias
Klasan, Antonio
author_sort Luger, Matthias
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Varus positioning of the femoral stem can affect the hip offset (HO). The critical trochanter angle (CTA) was introduced in 2019 as a novel geometric angle, to predict varus stem alignment in cementless straight stem THA. The aim of this study was to evaluate the applicability of the CTA as a predictor for stem alignment in THA with a cementless neck resecting short stem. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 106 patients (index surgery 2014–2019) with unilateral THA and a morphologically healthy contralateral hip as a reference (Kellgren–Lawrence ≤ 1) were included. A cementless short stem with meta-diaphyseal fixation and press-fit cup was implanted in all cases. Stem alignment, CCD angle, CTA and offset reconstruction were measured on preoperative and 3 months postoperative AP radiographs of the pelvis. RESULTS: Preoperative lower CTA and lower CCD angle were positively correlated (r = 0.472; p < 0.001). Higher varus stem alignment is correlated with lower CTA (r = − 0.384; p < 0.001) and lower CCD angle (r = − 0.474; p < 0.001). A CTA of 23.1° or lower showed a sensitivity of 59.1% and a specificity of 87.1% (AUC: 0.733) and a CCD angle of 132.75° or lower a sensitivity of 68.2% and a specificity of 80.6% (AUC: 0.77) for a varus stem alignment > 3°. CONCLUSION: The CTA is also applicable in cementless THA with a neck resecting short stem to evaluate risk of intraoperative varus stem positioning. The CCD angle shows higher sensitivity with marginally lower specificity. Therefore, the CTA is not superior in predicting varus stem alignment in short-stem THA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9886626
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98866262023-02-01 The ‘critical trochanter angle’ does not show superiority over the CCD angle in predicting varus stem alignment in cementless short-stem total hip arthroplasty Luger, Matthias Feldler, Sandra Pisecky, Lorenz Allerstorfer, Jakob Gotterbarm, Tobias Klasan, Antonio Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Hip Arthroplasty PURPOSE: Varus positioning of the femoral stem can affect the hip offset (HO). The critical trochanter angle (CTA) was introduced in 2019 as a novel geometric angle, to predict varus stem alignment in cementless straight stem THA. The aim of this study was to evaluate the applicability of the CTA as a predictor for stem alignment in THA with a cementless neck resecting short stem. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 106 patients (index surgery 2014–2019) with unilateral THA and a morphologically healthy contralateral hip as a reference (Kellgren–Lawrence ≤ 1) were included. A cementless short stem with meta-diaphyseal fixation and press-fit cup was implanted in all cases. Stem alignment, CCD angle, CTA and offset reconstruction were measured on preoperative and 3 months postoperative AP radiographs of the pelvis. RESULTS: Preoperative lower CTA and lower CCD angle were positively correlated (r = 0.472; p < 0.001). Higher varus stem alignment is correlated with lower CTA (r = − 0.384; p < 0.001) and lower CCD angle (r = − 0.474; p < 0.001). A CTA of 23.1° or lower showed a sensitivity of 59.1% and a specificity of 87.1% (AUC: 0.733) and a CCD angle of 132.75° or lower a sensitivity of 68.2% and a specificity of 80.6% (AUC: 0.77) for a varus stem alignment > 3°. CONCLUSION: The CTA is also applicable in cementless THA with a neck resecting short stem to evaluate risk of intraoperative varus stem positioning. The CCD angle shows higher sensitivity with marginally lower specificity. Therefore, the CTA is not superior in predicting varus stem alignment in short-stem THA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-01-12 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9886626/ /pubmed/35020039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04340-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Hip Arthroplasty
Luger, Matthias
Feldler, Sandra
Pisecky, Lorenz
Allerstorfer, Jakob
Gotterbarm, Tobias
Klasan, Antonio
The ‘critical trochanter angle’ does not show superiority over the CCD angle in predicting varus stem alignment in cementless short-stem total hip arthroplasty
title The ‘critical trochanter angle’ does not show superiority over the CCD angle in predicting varus stem alignment in cementless short-stem total hip arthroplasty
title_full The ‘critical trochanter angle’ does not show superiority over the CCD angle in predicting varus stem alignment in cementless short-stem total hip arthroplasty
title_fullStr The ‘critical trochanter angle’ does not show superiority over the CCD angle in predicting varus stem alignment in cementless short-stem total hip arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed The ‘critical trochanter angle’ does not show superiority over the CCD angle in predicting varus stem alignment in cementless short-stem total hip arthroplasty
title_short The ‘critical trochanter angle’ does not show superiority over the CCD angle in predicting varus stem alignment in cementless short-stem total hip arthroplasty
title_sort ‘critical trochanter angle’ does not show superiority over the ccd angle in predicting varus stem alignment in cementless short-stem total hip arthroplasty
topic Hip Arthroplasty
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9886626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35020039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04340-5
work_keys_str_mv AT lugermatthias thecriticaltrochanterangledoesnotshowsuperiorityovertheccdangleinpredictingvarusstemalignmentincementlessshortstemtotalhiparthroplasty
AT feldlersandra thecriticaltrochanterangledoesnotshowsuperiorityovertheccdangleinpredictingvarusstemalignmentincementlessshortstemtotalhiparthroplasty
AT piseckylorenz thecriticaltrochanterangledoesnotshowsuperiorityovertheccdangleinpredictingvarusstemalignmentincementlessshortstemtotalhiparthroplasty
AT allerstorferjakob thecriticaltrochanterangledoesnotshowsuperiorityovertheccdangleinpredictingvarusstemalignmentincementlessshortstemtotalhiparthroplasty
AT gotterbarmtobias thecriticaltrochanterangledoesnotshowsuperiorityovertheccdangleinpredictingvarusstemalignmentincementlessshortstemtotalhiparthroplasty
AT klasanantonio thecriticaltrochanterangledoesnotshowsuperiorityovertheccdangleinpredictingvarusstemalignmentincementlessshortstemtotalhiparthroplasty
AT lugermatthias criticaltrochanterangledoesnotshowsuperiorityovertheccdangleinpredictingvarusstemalignmentincementlessshortstemtotalhiparthroplasty
AT feldlersandra criticaltrochanterangledoesnotshowsuperiorityovertheccdangleinpredictingvarusstemalignmentincementlessshortstemtotalhiparthroplasty
AT piseckylorenz criticaltrochanterangledoesnotshowsuperiorityovertheccdangleinpredictingvarusstemalignmentincementlessshortstemtotalhiparthroplasty
AT allerstorferjakob criticaltrochanterangledoesnotshowsuperiorityovertheccdangleinpredictingvarusstemalignmentincementlessshortstemtotalhiparthroplasty
AT gotterbarmtobias criticaltrochanterangledoesnotshowsuperiorityovertheccdangleinpredictingvarusstemalignmentincementlessshortstemtotalhiparthroplasty
AT klasanantonio criticaltrochanterangledoesnotshowsuperiorityovertheccdangleinpredictingvarusstemalignmentincementlessshortstemtotalhiparthroplasty