Cargando…
Discriminative accuracy of the A/T/N scheme to identify cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease
INTRODUCTION: The optimal combination of amyloid‐β/tau/neurodegeneration (A/T/N) biomarker profiles for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia is unclear. METHODS: We examined the discriminative accuracy of A/T/N combinations assessed with neuroimaging biomarkers for the differentia...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9886860/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36733847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12390 |
Sumario: | INTRODUCTION: The optimal combination of amyloid‐β/tau/neurodegeneration (A/T/N) biomarker profiles for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia is unclear. METHODS: We examined the discriminative accuracy of A/T/N combinations assessed with neuroimaging biomarkers for the differentiation of AD from cognitively unimpaired (CU) elderly and non‐AD neurodegenerative diseases in the TRIAD, BioFINDER‐1 and BioFINDER‐2 cohorts (total n = 832) using area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC). RESULTS: For the diagnosis of AD dementia (vs. CU elderly), T biomarkers performed as well as the complete A/T/N system (AUC range: 0.90–0.99). A and T biomarkers in isolation performed as well as the complete A/T/N system in differentiating AD dementia from non‐AD neurodegenerative diseases (AUC range; A biomarker: 0.84–1; T biomarker: 0.83–1). DISCUSSION: In diagnostic settings, the use of A or T neuroimaging biomarkers alone can reduce patient burden and medical costs compared with using their combination, without significantly compromising accuracy. |
---|