Cargando…
Genetic and demographic consequences of range contraction patterns during biological annihilation
Species range contractions both contribute to, and result from, biological annihilation, yet do not receive the same attention as extinctions. Range contractions can lead to marked impacts on populations but are usually characterized only by reduction in extent of range. For effective conservation,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9886963/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36717685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28927-z |
_version_ | 1784880233865805824 |
---|---|
author | Rogan, Jordan E. Parker, Mickey Ray Hancock, Zachary B. Earl, Alexis D. Buchholtz, Erin K. Chyn, Kristina Martina, Jason Fitzgerald, Lee A. |
author_facet | Rogan, Jordan E. Parker, Mickey Ray Hancock, Zachary B. Earl, Alexis D. Buchholtz, Erin K. Chyn, Kristina Martina, Jason Fitzgerald, Lee A. |
author_sort | Rogan, Jordan E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Species range contractions both contribute to, and result from, biological annihilation, yet do not receive the same attention as extinctions. Range contractions can lead to marked impacts on populations but are usually characterized only by reduction in extent of range. For effective conservation, it is critical to recognize that not all range contractions are the same. We propose three distinct patterns of range contraction: shrinkage, amputation, and fragmentation. We tested the impact of these patterns on populations of a generalist species using forward-time simulations. All three patterns caused 86–88% reduction in population abundance and significantly increased average relatedness, with differing patterns in declines of nucleotide diversity relative to the contraction pattern. The fragmentation pattern resulted in the strongest effects on post-contraction genetic diversity and structure. Defining and quantifying range contraction patterns and their consequences for Earth’s biodiversity would provide useful and necessary information to combat biological annihilation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9886963 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98869632023-02-01 Genetic and demographic consequences of range contraction patterns during biological annihilation Rogan, Jordan E. Parker, Mickey Ray Hancock, Zachary B. Earl, Alexis D. Buchholtz, Erin K. Chyn, Kristina Martina, Jason Fitzgerald, Lee A. Sci Rep Article Species range contractions both contribute to, and result from, biological annihilation, yet do not receive the same attention as extinctions. Range contractions can lead to marked impacts on populations but are usually characterized only by reduction in extent of range. For effective conservation, it is critical to recognize that not all range contractions are the same. We propose three distinct patterns of range contraction: shrinkage, amputation, and fragmentation. We tested the impact of these patterns on populations of a generalist species using forward-time simulations. All three patterns caused 86–88% reduction in population abundance and significantly increased average relatedness, with differing patterns in declines of nucleotide diversity relative to the contraction pattern. The fragmentation pattern resulted in the strongest effects on post-contraction genetic diversity and structure. Defining and quantifying range contraction patterns and their consequences for Earth’s biodiversity would provide useful and necessary information to combat biological annihilation. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9886963/ /pubmed/36717685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28927-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Rogan, Jordan E. Parker, Mickey Ray Hancock, Zachary B. Earl, Alexis D. Buchholtz, Erin K. Chyn, Kristina Martina, Jason Fitzgerald, Lee A. Genetic and demographic consequences of range contraction patterns during biological annihilation |
title | Genetic and demographic consequences of range contraction patterns during biological annihilation |
title_full | Genetic and demographic consequences of range contraction patterns during biological annihilation |
title_fullStr | Genetic and demographic consequences of range contraction patterns during biological annihilation |
title_full_unstemmed | Genetic and demographic consequences of range contraction patterns during biological annihilation |
title_short | Genetic and demographic consequences of range contraction patterns during biological annihilation |
title_sort | genetic and demographic consequences of range contraction patterns during biological annihilation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9886963/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36717685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28927-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT roganjordane geneticanddemographicconsequencesofrangecontractionpatternsduringbiologicalannihilation AT parkermickeyray geneticanddemographicconsequencesofrangecontractionpatternsduringbiologicalannihilation AT hancockzacharyb geneticanddemographicconsequencesofrangecontractionpatternsduringbiologicalannihilation AT earlalexisd geneticanddemographicconsequencesofrangecontractionpatternsduringbiologicalannihilation AT buchholtzerink geneticanddemographicconsequencesofrangecontractionpatternsduringbiologicalannihilation AT chynkristina geneticanddemographicconsequencesofrangecontractionpatternsduringbiologicalannihilation AT martinajason geneticanddemographicconsequencesofrangecontractionpatternsduringbiologicalannihilation AT fitzgeraldleea geneticanddemographicconsequencesofrangecontractionpatternsduringbiologicalannihilation |