Cargando…
Graft-to-recipient weight ratio exerts nonlinear effects on prognosis by interacting with donor liver macrosteatosis
AIM: To investigate the interactions between the graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GWRWR) and other risk factors responsible for inferior allograft outcomes. METHODS: A total of 362 patients who received liver transplantation (LT) were enrolled. Indicators such as graft/recipient weight and other pro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9887135/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36733681 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1075845 |
_version_ | 1784880272028729344 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Zhengtao Lyu, Jingting Li, Xiang Yu, Lu Que, Shuping Xu, Jun Geng, Lei Zheng, Shusen |
author_facet | Liu, Zhengtao Lyu, Jingting Li, Xiang Yu, Lu Que, Shuping Xu, Jun Geng, Lei Zheng, Shusen |
author_sort | Liu, Zhengtao |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To investigate the interactions between the graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GWRWR) and other risk factors responsible for inferior allograft outcomes. METHODS: A total of 362 patients who received liver transplantation (LT) were enrolled. Indicators such as graft/recipient weight and other prognostic factors were collected. Comparisons of indicators and survival analysis were performed in groups categorized by the GWRWR. Interactions of large-for-size grafts (LFSGs) with graft macrosteatosis (MaS) were evaluated in terms of relative excess risk caused by interaction (RERI) and attributable proportion (AP). Cytoscape visualized the role of LFSGs in the risk profile for poor prognosis. RESULTS: Based on the GWRWR, LT cases can be categorized into three subgroups, standard (1%–2.5%), optimal (2.5%–3.0%), and inferior prognosis (>3.0%). Survival analysis confirmed clear separations in cases categorized by the above-defined limits on the GWRWR (P < 0.05). LFSGs caused inferior prognosis by initiating positive interactions with MaS severity. CONCLUSION: The GWRWR exerted nonlinear effects on prognosis in deceased donor LT cases. LFSGs (GWRWR > 3.0%) caused inferior outcomes, while grafts sized within (2.5%–3.0%) had optimal post-transplant prognosis. MaS increased the risk of poor prognosis by exerting positive synergistic effects on LFSGs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9887135 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98871352023-02-01 Graft-to-recipient weight ratio exerts nonlinear effects on prognosis by interacting with donor liver macrosteatosis Liu, Zhengtao Lyu, Jingting Li, Xiang Yu, Lu Que, Shuping Xu, Jun Geng, Lei Zheng, Shusen Front Surg Surgery AIM: To investigate the interactions between the graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GWRWR) and other risk factors responsible for inferior allograft outcomes. METHODS: A total of 362 patients who received liver transplantation (LT) were enrolled. Indicators such as graft/recipient weight and other prognostic factors were collected. Comparisons of indicators and survival analysis were performed in groups categorized by the GWRWR. Interactions of large-for-size grafts (LFSGs) with graft macrosteatosis (MaS) were evaluated in terms of relative excess risk caused by interaction (RERI) and attributable proportion (AP). Cytoscape visualized the role of LFSGs in the risk profile for poor prognosis. RESULTS: Based on the GWRWR, LT cases can be categorized into three subgroups, standard (1%–2.5%), optimal (2.5%–3.0%), and inferior prognosis (>3.0%). Survival analysis confirmed clear separations in cases categorized by the above-defined limits on the GWRWR (P < 0.05). LFSGs caused inferior prognosis by initiating positive interactions with MaS severity. CONCLUSION: The GWRWR exerted nonlinear effects on prognosis in deceased donor LT cases. LFSGs (GWRWR > 3.0%) caused inferior outcomes, while grafts sized within (2.5%–3.0%) had optimal post-transplant prognosis. MaS increased the risk of poor prognosis by exerting positive synergistic effects on LFSGs. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9887135/ /pubmed/36733681 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1075845 Text en © 2023 Liu, Lyu, Li, Yu, Que, Xu, Geng and Zheng. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Surgery Liu, Zhengtao Lyu, Jingting Li, Xiang Yu, Lu Que, Shuping Xu, Jun Geng, Lei Zheng, Shusen Graft-to-recipient weight ratio exerts nonlinear effects on prognosis by interacting with donor liver macrosteatosis |
title | Graft-to-recipient weight ratio exerts nonlinear effects on prognosis by interacting with donor liver macrosteatosis |
title_full | Graft-to-recipient weight ratio exerts nonlinear effects on prognosis by interacting with donor liver macrosteatosis |
title_fullStr | Graft-to-recipient weight ratio exerts nonlinear effects on prognosis by interacting with donor liver macrosteatosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Graft-to-recipient weight ratio exerts nonlinear effects on prognosis by interacting with donor liver macrosteatosis |
title_short | Graft-to-recipient weight ratio exerts nonlinear effects on prognosis by interacting with donor liver macrosteatosis |
title_sort | graft-to-recipient weight ratio exerts nonlinear effects on prognosis by interacting with donor liver macrosteatosis |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9887135/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36733681 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1075845 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuzhengtao grafttorecipientweightratioexertsnonlineareffectsonprognosisbyinteractingwithdonorlivermacrosteatosis AT lyujingting grafttorecipientweightratioexertsnonlineareffectsonprognosisbyinteractingwithdonorlivermacrosteatosis AT lixiang grafttorecipientweightratioexertsnonlineareffectsonprognosisbyinteractingwithdonorlivermacrosteatosis AT yulu grafttorecipientweightratioexertsnonlineareffectsonprognosisbyinteractingwithdonorlivermacrosteatosis AT queshuping grafttorecipientweightratioexertsnonlineareffectsonprognosisbyinteractingwithdonorlivermacrosteatosis AT xujun grafttorecipientweightratioexertsnonlineareffectsonprognosisbyinteractingwithdonorlivermacrosteatosis AT genglei grafttorecipientweightratioexertsnonlineareffectsonprognosisbyinteractingwithdonorlivermacrosteatosis AT zhengshusen grafttorecipientweightratioexertsnonlineareffectsonprognosisbyinteractingwithdonorlivermacrosteatosis |