Cargando…
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Walsh Family Resilience Questionnaire among community-dwelling disabled elderly individuals (WFRQ-CE)
OBJECTIVE: To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Walsh Family Resilience Questionnaire among community-dwelling disabled elderly individuals (WFRQ-CE). METHODS: Convenience sampling was used to select 566 dyads of disabled elderly individuals and their caregivers. The Wa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9887152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36733884 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1095958 |
_version_ | 1784880276158021632 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Xiangchun Wang, Anni Guan, Tingyu Kuang, Yi Zhang, Yuyi Wu, Fangqi |
author_facet | Zhang, Xiangchun Wang, Anni Guan, Tingyu Kuang, Yi Zhang, Yuyi Wu, Fangqi |
author_sort | Zhang, Xiangchun |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Walsh Family Resilience Questionnaire among community-dwelling disabled elderly individuals (WFRQ-CE). METHODS: Convenience sampling was used to select 566 dyads of disabled elderly individuals and their caregivers. The Walsh Family Resilience Questionnaire Chinese Version (WFRQ-C) was tested among elderly individuals. The Family Care Capacity Scale for Elderly Patients (FCCSE) was used as a concurrent validation tool for the caregivers, and the Psychological Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10), and the Social Support Assessment (SSRS-10) were used as concurrent validation tools for both the elderly individuals and the caregivers. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealed four common factors–“Family belief,” “Organization and problem solving,” “Family communication,” and “Utilization of external resources”–with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 56.94%. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) yielded the following fit indices: chi-square/freedom degree (χ2/df) = 2.007, Tucker Lewis index (TLI) = 0.900, incremental fit index (IFI) = 0.917, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.916, parsimony goodness-of-fit index (PGFI) = 0.681, and root-mean-square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.060. The concurrent scales were significantly correlated with the WFRQ-C total score and the scores for each factor (r values between 0.23 and 0.60, P < 0.01). The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.93 for the WFRQ-CE and 0.87, 0.83, 0.89, and 0.65 for the four factors; the retest reliability was 0.96 for the total scale and 0.95, 0.92, 0.92, and 0.95 for the four factors; the split-half reliability was 0.85 for the total scale, and 0.81, 0.78, 0.79, and 0.68 for the four factors. CONCLUSION: The WFRQ-CE has good reliability and validity among community-dwelling disabled elderly individuals and can be used to evaluate the level of family resilience. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9887152 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98871522023-02-01 Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Walsh Family Resilience Questionnaire among community-dwelling disabled elderly individuals (WFRQ-CE) Zhang, Xiangchun Wang, Anni Guan, Tingyu Kuang, Yi Zhang, Yuyi Wu, Fangqi Front Psychol Psychology OBJECTIVE: To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Walsh Family Resilience Questionnaire among community-dwelling disabled elderly individuals (WFRQ-CE). METHODS: Convenience sampling was used to select 566 dyads of disabled elderly individuals and their caregivers. The Walsh Family Resilience Questionnaire Chinese Version (WFRQ-C) was tested among elderly individuals. The Family Care Capacity Scale for Elderly Patients (FCCSE) was used as a concurrent validation tool for the caregivers, and the Psychological Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10), and the Social Support Assessment (SSRS-10) were used as concurrent validation tools for both the elderly individuals and the caregivers. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealed four common factors–“Family belief,” “Organization and problem solving,” “Family communication,” and “Utilization of external resources”–with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 56.94%. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) yielded the following fit indices: chi-square/freedom degree (χ2/df) = 2.007, Tucker Lewis index (TLI) = 0.900, incremental fit index (IFI) = 0.917, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.916, parsimony goodness-of-fit index (PGFI) = 0.681, and root-mean-square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.060. The concurrent scales were significantly correlated with the WFRQ-C total score and the scores for each factor (r values between 0.23 and 0.60, P < 0.01). The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.93 for the WFRQ-CE and 0.87, 0.83, 0.89, and 0.65 for the four factors; the retest reliability was 0.96 for the total scale and 0.95, 0.92, 0.92, and 0.95 for the four factors; the split-half reliability was 0.85 for the total scale, and 0.81, 0.78, 0.79, and 0.68 for the four factors. CONCLUSION: The WFRQ-CE has good reliability and validity among community-dwelling disabled elderly individuals and can be used to evaluate the level of family resilience. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9887152/ /pubmed/36733884 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1095958 Text en Copyright © 2023 Zhang, Wang, Guan, Kuang, Zhang and Wu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Zhang, Xiangchun Wang, Anni Guan, Tingyu Kuang, Yi Zhang, Yuyi Wu, Fangqi Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Walsh Family Resilience Questionnaire among community-dwelling disabled elderly individuals (WFRQ-CE) |
title | Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Walsh Family Resilience Questionnaire among community-dwelling disabled elderly individuals (WFRQ-CE) |
title_full | Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Walsh Family Resilience Questionnaire among community-dwelling disabled elderly individuals (WFRQ-CE) |
title_fullStr | Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Walsh Family Resilience Questionnaire among community-dwelling disabled elderly individuals (WFRQ-CE) |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Walsh Family Resilience Questionnaire among community-dwelling disabled elderly individuals (WFRQ-CE) |
title_short | Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Walsh Family Resilience Questionnaire among community-dwelling disabled elderly individuals (WFRQ-CE) |
title_sort | reliability and validity of the chinese version of the walsh family resilience questionnaire among community-dwelling disabled elderly individuals (wfrq-ce) |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9887152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36733884 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1095958 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangxiangchun reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionofthewalshfamilyresiliencequestionnaireamongcommunitydwellingdisabledelderlyindividualswfrqce AT wanganni reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionofthewalshfamilyresiliencequestionnaireamongcommunitydwellingdisabledelderlyindividualswfrqce AT guantingyu reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionofthewalshfamilyresiliencequestionnaireamongcommunitydwellingdisabledelderlyindividualswfrqce AT kuangyi reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionofthewalshfamilyresiliencequestionnaireamongcommunitydwellingdisabledelderlyindividualswfrqce AT zhangyuyi reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionofthewalshfamilyresiliencequestionnaireamongcommunitydwellingdisabledelderlyindividualswfrqce AT wufangqi reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionofthewalshfamilyresiliencequestionnaireamongcommunitydwellingdisabledelderlyindividualswfrqce |