Cargando…

EffEctiveness of Prophylactic fOam dressings in the prevention of saCral pressure injuries in at-risk hospitalised patients: the EEPOC trial

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic dressings are increasingly used to prevent pressure injuries in hospitalised patients. However, evidence regarding the effectiveness of these dressings is still emerging. This trial aims to determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a prophylactic silicone foam border...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walker, R. M., Chaboyer, W., Cooke, M., Whitty, J. A., Thalib, L., Lockwood, I., Latimer, S., Campbell, J., Probert, R., Gillespie, B. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9887548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36721259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06999-y
_version_ 1784880362099310592
author Walker, R. M.
Chaboyer, W.
Cooke, M.
Whitty, J. A.
Thalib, L.
Lockwood, I.
Latimer, S.
Campbell, J.
Probert, R.
Gillespie, B. M.
author_facet Walker, R. M.
Chaboyer, W.
Cooke, M.
Whitty, J. A.
Thalib, L.
Lockwood, I.
Latimer, S.
Campbell, J.
Probert, R.
Gillespie, B. M.
author_sort Walker, R. M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prophylactic dressings are increasingly used to prevent pressure injuries in hospitalised patients. However, evidence regarding the effectiveness of these dressings is still emerging. This trial aims to determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a prophylactic silicone foam border dressing in preventing sacral pressure injuries in medical-surgical patients. METHODS: This is a multicentre, pragmatic, parallel group, randomised controlled trial. A sample size of 1320 was calculated to have >90% power to detect a 5% difference in the primary outcome at an alpha of 0.05. Adult patients admitted to participating medical-surgical wards are screened for eligibility: ≥18 years, admitted to hospital within the previous 36 h, expected length of stay of ≥24 h, and assessed high risk for hospital-acquired pressure injury. Consenting participants are randomly allocated to either prophylactic silicone foam dressing intervention or usual care without any dressing as the control group via a web-based randomisation service independent of the trial. Patients are enrolled across three Australian hospitals. The primary outcome is the cumulative incidence of patients who develop a sacral pressure injury. Secondary outcomes include the time to sacral pressure injury, incidence of severity (stage) of sacral pressure injury, cost-effectiveness of dressings, and process evaluation. Participant outcomes are assessed daily for up to 14 days by blinded independent outcome assessors using de-identified, digitally modified sacral photographs. Those who develop a sacral pressure injury are followed for an additional 14 days to estimate costs of pressure injury treatment. Analysis of clinical outcomes will be based on intention-to-treat, per-protocol, and sensitivity analyses. DISCUSSION: This trial aims to provide definitive evidence on the effect prophylactic dressings have on the development of hospital-acquired sacral pressure injuries in medical-surgical patients. A parallel economic evaluation of pressure injury prevention and treatment will enable evidence-informed decisions and policy. The inclusion of a process evaluation will help to explain the contextual factors that may have a bearing on trial results including the acceptability of the dressings to patients and staff. The trial commenced 5 March 2020 and has been significantly delayed due to COVID-19. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ANZCTR ACTRN12619000763145. Prospectively registered on 22 May 2019
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9887548
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98875482023-01-31 EffEctiveness of Prophylactic fOam dressings in the prevention of saCral pressure injuries in at-risk hospitalised patients: the EEPOC trial Walker, R. M. Chaboyer, W. Cooke, M. Whitty, J. A. Thalib, L. Lockwood, I. Latimer, S. Campbell, J. Probert, R. Gillespie, B. M. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Prophylactic dressings are increasingly used to prevent pressure injuries in hospitalised patients. However, evidence regarding the effectiveness of these dressings is still emerging. This trial aims to determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a prophylactic silicone foam border dressing in preventing sacral pressure injuries in medical-surgical patients. METHODS: This is a multicentre, pragmatic, parallel group, randomised controlled trial. A sample size of 1320 was calculated to have >90% power to detect a 5% difference in the primary outcome at an alpha of 0.05. Adult patients admitted to participating medical-surgical wards are screened for eligibility: ≥18 years, admitted to hospital within the previous 36 h, expected length of stay of ≥24 h, and assessed high risk for hospital-acquired pressure injury. Consenting participants are randomly allocated to either prophylactic silicone foam dressing intervention or usual care without any dressing as the control group via a web-based randomisation service independent of the trial. Patients are enrolled across three Australian hospitals. The primary outcome is the cumulative incidence of patients who develop a sacral pressure injury. Secondary outcomes include the time to sacral pressure injury, incidence of severity (stage) of sacral pressure injury, cost-effectiveness of dressings, and process evaluation. Participant outcomes are assessed daily for up to 14 days by blinded independent outcome assessors using de-identified, digitally modified sacral photographs. Those who develop a sacral pressure injury are followed for an additional 14 days to estimate costs of pressure injury treatment. Analysis of clinical outcomes will be based on intention-to-treat, per-protocol, and sensitivity analyses. DISCUSSION: This trial aims to provide definitive evidence on the effect prophylactic dressings have on the development of hospital-acquired sacral pressure injuries in medical-surgical patients. A parallel economic evaluation of pressure injury prevention and treatment will enable evidence-informed decisions and policy. The inclusion of a process evaluation will help to explain the contextual factors that may have a bearing on trial results including the acceptability of the dressings to patients and staff. The trial commenced 5 March 2020 and has been significantly delayed due to COVID-19. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ANZCTR ACTRN12619000763145. Prospectively registered on 22 May 2019 BioMed Central 2023-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9887548/ /pubmed/36721259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06999-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Walker, R. M.
Chaboyer, W.
Cooke, M.
Whitty, J. A.
Thalib, L.
Lockwood, I.
Latimer, S.
Campbell, J.
Probert, R.
Gillespie, B. M.
EffEctiveness of Prophylactic fOam dressings in the prevention of saCral pressure injuries in at-risk hospitalised patients: the EEPOC trial
title EffEctiveness of Prophylactic fOam dressings in the prevention of saCral pressure injuries in at-risk hospitalised patients: the EEPOC trial
title_full EffEctiveness of Prophylactic fOam dressings in the prevention of saCral pressure injuries in at-risk hospitalised patients: the EEPOC trial
title_fullStr EffEctiveness of Prophylactic fOam dressings in the prevention of saCral pressure injuries in at-risk hospitalised patients: the EEPOC trial
title_full_unstemmed EffEctiveness of Prophylactic fOam dressings in the prevention of saCral pressure injuries in at-risk hospitalised patients: the EEPOC trial
title_short EffEctiveness of Prophylactic fOam dressings in the prevention of saCral pressure injuries in at-risk hospitalised patients: the EEPOC trial
title_sort effectiveness of prophylactic foam dressings in the prevention of sacral pressure injuries in at-risk hospitalised patients: the eepoc trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9887548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36721259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06999-y
work_keys_str_mv AT walkerrm effectivenessofprophylacticfoamdressingsinthepreventionofsacralpressureinjuriesinatriskhospitalisedpatientstheeepoctrial
AT chaboyerw effectivenessofprophylacticfoamdressingsinthepreventionofsacralpressureinjuriesinatriskhospitalisedpatientstheeepoctrial
AT cookem effectivenessofprophylacticfoamdressingsinthepreventionofsacralpressureinjuriesinatriskhospitalisedpatientstheeepoctrial
AT whittyja effectivenessofprophylacticfoamdressingsinthepreventionofsacralpressureinjuriesinatriskhospitalisedpatientstheeepoctrial
AT thalibl effectivenessofprophylacticfoamdressingsinthepreventionofsacralpressureinjuriesinatriskhospitalisedpatientstheeepoctrial
AT lockwoodi effectivenessofprophylacticfoamdressingsinthepreventionofsacralpressureinjuriesinatriskhospitalisedpatientstheeepoctrial
AT latimers effectivenessofprophylacticfoamdressingsinthepreventionofsacralpressureinjuriesinatriskhospitalisedpatientstheeepoctrial
AT campbellj effectivenessofprophylacticfoamdressingsinthepreventionofsacralpressureinjuriesinatriskhospitalisedpatientstheeepoctrial
AT probertr effectivenessofprophylacticfoamdressingsinthepreventionofsacralpressureinjuriesinatriskhospitalisedpatientstheeepoctrial
AT gillespiebm effectivenessofprophylacticfoamdressingsinthepreventionofsacralpressureinjuriesinatriskhospitalisedpatientstheeepoctrial