Cargando…
Multicenter Randomized Trial of Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes and Recent-Onset Acute Myocardial Infarction: Results of the LIBERATES Trial
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the impact of modern glucose-monitoring strategies on glycemic and patient-related outcomes in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and recent myocardial infarction (MI) and assess cost effectiveness. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: LIBERATES was a multicenter two-arm randomized...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Diabetes Association
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9887626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36516054 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc22-1219 |
_version_ | 1784880378574536704 |
---|---|
author | Ajjan, Ramzi A. Heller, Simon R. Everett, Colin C. Vargas-Palacios, Armando Higham, Ruchi Sharples, Linda Gorog, Diana A. Rogers, Alice Reynolds, Catherine Fernandez, Catherine Rodrigues, Pedro Sathyapalan, Thozhukat Storey, Robert F. Stocken, Deborah D. |
author_facet | Ajjan, Ramzi A. Heller, Simon R. Everett, Colin C. Vargas-Palacios, Armando Higham, Ruchi Sharples, Linda Gorog, Diana A. Rogers, Alice Reynolds, Catherine Fernandez, Catherine Rodrigues, Pedro Sathyapalan, Thozhukat Storey, Robert F. Stocken, Deborah D. |
author_sort | Ajjan, Ramzi A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To analyze the impact of modern glucose-monitoring strategies on glycemic and patient-related outcomes in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and recent myocardial infarction (MI) and assess cost effectiveness. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: LIBERATES was a multicenter two-arm randomized trial comparing self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) with intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM), also known as flash CGM, in individuals with T2D and recent MI, treated with insulin and/or a sulphonylurea before hospital admission. The primary outcome measure was time in range (TIR) (glucose 3.9–10 mmol/L/day) on days 76–90 post-randomization. Secondary and exploratory outcomes included time in hypoglycemia, hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)), clinical outcome, quality of life (QOL), and cost effectiveness. RESULTS: Of 141 participants randomly assigned (median age 63 years; interquartile range 53, 70), 73% of whom were men, isCGM was associated with increased TIR by 17 min/day (95% credible interval −105 to +153 min/day), with 59% probability of benefit. Users of isCGM showed lower hypoglycemic exposure (<3.9 mmol/L) at days 76–90 (−80 min/day; 95% CI −118, −43), also evident at days 16–30 (−28 min/day; 95% CI −92, 2). Compared with baseline, HbA(1c) showed similar reductions of 7 mmol/mol at 3 months in both study arms. Combined glycemic emergencies and mortality occurred in four isCGM and seven SMBG study participants. QOL measures marginally favored isCGM, and the intervention proved to be cost effective. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with SMBG, isCGM in T2D individuals with MI marginally increases TIR and significantly reduces hypoglycemic exposure while equally improving HbA(1c), explaining its cost effectiveness. Studies are required to understand whether these glycemic differences translate into longer-term clinical benefit. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9887626 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Diabetes Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98876262023-02-08 Multicenter Randomized Trial of Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes and Recent-Onset Acute Myocardial Infarction: Results of the LIBERATES Trial Ajjan, Ramzi A. Heller, Simon R. Everett, Colin C. Vargas-Palacios, Armando Higham, Ruchi Sharples, Linda Gorog, Diana A. Rogers, Alice Reynolds, Catherine Fernandez, Catherine Rodrigues, Pedro Sathyapalan, Thozhukat Storey, Robert F. Stocken, Deborah D. Diabetes Care Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk OBJECTIVE: To analyze the impact of modern glucose-monitoring strategies on glycemic and patient-related outcomes in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and recent myocardial infarction (MI) and assess cost effectiveness. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: LIBERATES was a multicenter two-arm randomized trial comparing self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) with intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM), also known as flash CGM, in individuals with T2D and recent MI, treated with insulin and/or a sulphonylurea before hospital admission. The primary outcome measure was time in range (TIR) (glucose 3.9–10 mmol/L/day) on days 76–90 post-randomization. Secondary and exploratory outcomes included time in hypoglycemia, hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)), clinical outcome, quality of life (QOL), and cost effectiveness. RESULTS: Of 141 participants randomly assigned (median age 63 years; interquartile range 53, 70), 73% of whom were men, isCGM was associated with increased TIR by 17 min/day (95% credible interval −105 to +153 min/day), with 59% probability of benefit. Users of isCGM showed lower hypoglycemic exposure (<3.9 mmol/L) at days 76–90 (−80 min/day; 95% CI −118, −43), also evident at days 16–30 (−28 min/day; 95% CI −92, 2). Compared with baseline, HbA(1c) showed similar reductions of 7 mmol/mol at 3 months in both study arms. Combined glycemic emergencies and mortality occurred in four isCGM and seven SMBG study participants. QOL measures marginally favored isCGM, and the intervention proved to be cost effective. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with SMBG, isCGM in T2D individuals with MI marginally increases TIR and significantly reduces hypoglycemic exposure while equally improving HbA(1c), explaining its cost effectiveness. Studies are required to understand whether these glycemic differences translate into longer-term clinical benefit. American Diabetes Association 2023-02 2022-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9887626/ /pubmed/36516054 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc22-1219 Text en © 2023 by the American Diabetes Association https://www.diabetesjournals.org/journals/pages/licenseReaders may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at https://www.diabetesjournals.org/journals/pages/license. |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk Ajjan, Ramzi A. Heller, Simon R. Everett, Colin C. Vargas-Palacios, Armando Higham, Ruchi Sharples, Linda Gorog, Diana A. Rogers, Alice Reynolds, Catherine Fernandez, Catherine Rodrigues, Pedro Sathyapalan, Thozhukat Storey, Robert F. Stocken, Deborah D. Multicenter Randomized Trial of Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes and Recent-Onset Acute Myocardial Infarction: Results of the LIBERATES Trial |
title | Multicenter Randomized Trial of Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes and Recent-Onset Acute Myocardial Infarction: Results of the LIBERATES Trial |
title_full | Multicenter Randomized Trial of Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes and Recent-Onset Acute Myocardial Infarction: Results of the LIBERATES Trial |
title_fullStr | Multicenter Randomized Trial of Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes and Recent-Onset Acute Myocardial Infarction: Results of the LIBERATES Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Multicenter Randomized Trial of Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes and Recent-Onset Acute Myocardial Infarction: Results of the LIBERATES Trial |
title_short | Multicenter Randomized Trial of Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes and Recent-Onset Acute Myocardial Infarction: Results of the LIBERATES Trial |
title_sort | multicenter randomized trial of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring versus self-monitoring of blood glucose in individuals with type 2 diabetes and recent-onset acute myocardial infarction: results of the liberates trial |
topic | Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9887626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36516054 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc22-1219 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ajjanramzia multicenterrandomizedtrialofintermittentlyscannedcontinuousglucosemonitoringversusselfmonitoringofbloodglucoseinindividualswithtype2diabetesandrecentonsetacutemyocardialinfarctionresultsoftheliberatestrial AT hellersimonr multicenterrandomizedtrialofintermittentlyscannedcontinuousglucosemonitoringversusselfmonitoringofbloodglucoseinindividualswithtype2diabetesandrecentonsetacutemyocardialinfarctionresultsoftheliberatestrial AT everettcolinc multicenterrandomizedtrialofintermittentlyscannedcontinuousglucosemonitoringversusselfmonitoringofbloodglucoseinindividualswithtype2diabetesandrecentonsetacutemyocardialinfarctionresultsoftheliberatestrial AT vargaspalaciosarmando multicenterrandomizedtrialofintermittentlyscannedcontinuousglucosemonitoringversusselfmonitoringofbloodglucoseinindividualswithtype2diabetesandrecentonsetacutemyocardialinfarctionresultsoftheliberatestrial AT highamruchi multicenterrandomizedtrialofintermittentlyscannedcontinuousglucosemonitoringversusselfmonitoringofbloodglucoseinindividualswithtype2diabetesandrecentonsetacutemyocardialinfarctionresultsoftheliberatestrial AT sharpleslinda multicenterrandomizedtrialofintermittentlyscannedcontinuousglucosemonitoringversusselfmonitoringofbloodglucoseinindividualswithtype2diabetesandrecentonsetacutemyocardialinfarctionresultsoftheliberatestrial AT gorogdianaa multicenterrandomizedtrialofintermittentlyscannedcontinuousglucosemonitoringversusselfmonitoringofbloodglucoseinindividualswithtype2diabetesandrecentonsetacutemyocardialinfarctionresultsoftheliberatestrial AT rogersalice multicenterrandomizedtrialofintermittentlyscannedcontinuousglucosemonitoringversusselfmonitoringofbloodglucoseinindividualswithtype2diabetesandrecentonsetacutemyocardialinfarctionresultsoftheliberatestrial AT reynoldscatherine multicenterrandomizedtrialofintermittentlyscannedcontinuousglucosemonitoringversusselfmonitoringofbloodglucoseinindividualswithtype2diabetesandrecentonsetacutemyocardialinfarctionresultsoftheliberatestrial AT fernandezcatherine multicenterrandomizedtrialofintermittentlyscannedcontinuousglucosemonitoringversusselfmonitoringofbloodglucoseinindividualswithtype2diabetesandrecentonsetacutemyocardialinfarctionresultsoftheliberatestrial AT rodriguespedro multicenterrandomizedtrialofintermittentlyscannedcontinuousglucosemonitoringversusselfmonitoringofbloodglucoseinindividualswithtype2diabetesandrecentonsetacutemyocardialinfarctionresultsoftheliberatestrial AT sathyapalanthozhukat multicenterrandomizedtrialofintermittentlyscannedcontinuousglucosemonitoringversusselfmonitoringofbloodglucoseinindividualswithtype2diabetesandrecentonsetacutemyocardialinfarctionresultsoftheliberatestrial AT storeyrobertf multicenterrandomizedtrialofintermittentlyscannedcontinuousglucosemonitoringversusselfmonitoringofbloodglucoseinindividualswithtype2diabetesandrecentonsetacutemyocardialinfarctionresultsoftheliberatestrial AT stockendeborahd multicenterrandomizedtrialofintermittentlyscannedcontinuousglucosemonitoringversusselfmonitoringofbloodglucoseinindividualswithtype2diabetesandrecentonsetacutemyocardialinfarctionresultsoftheliberatestrial |