Cargando…

Multicenter Randomized Trial of Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes and Recent-Onset Acute Myocardial Infarction: Results of the LIBERATES Trial

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the impact of modern glucose-monitoring strategies on glycemic and patient-related outcomes in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and recent myocardial infarction (MI) and assess cost effectiveness. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: LIBERATES was a multicenter two-arm randomized...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ajjan, Ramzi A., Heller, Simon R., Everett, Colin C., Vargas-Palacios, Armando, Higham, Ruchi, Sharples, Linda, Gorog, Diana A., Rogers, Alice, Reynolds, Catherine, Fernandez, Catherine, Rodrigues, Pedro, Sathyapalan, Thozhukat, Storey, Robert F., Stocken, Deborah D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9887626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36516054
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc22-1219
_version_ 1784880378574536704
author Ajjan, Ramzi A.
Heller, Simon R.
Everett, Colin C.
Vargas-Palacios, Armando
Higham, Ruchi
Sharples, Linda
Gorog, Diana A.
Rogers, Alice
Reynolds, Catherine
Fernandez, Catherine
Rodrigues, Pedro
Sathyapalan, Thozhukat
Storey, Robert F.
Stocken, Deborah D.
author_facet Ajjan, Ramzi A.
Heller, Simon R.
Everett, Colin C.
Vargas-Palacios, Armando
Higham, Ruchi
Sharples, Linda
Gorog, Diana A.
Rogers, Alice
Reynolds, Catherine
Fernandez, Catherine
Rodrigues, Pedro
Sathyapalan, Thozhukat
Storey, Robert F.
Stocken, Deborah D.
author_sort Ajjan, Ramzi A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To analyze the impact of modern glucose-monitoring strategies on glycemic and patient-related outcomes in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and recent myocardial infarction (MI) and assess cost effectiveness. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: LIBERATES was a multicenter two-arm randomized trial comparing self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) with intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM), also known as flash CGM, in individuals with T2D and recent MI, treated with insulin and/or a sulphonylurea before hospital admission. The primary outcome measure was time in range (TIR) (glucose 3.9–10 mmol/L/day) on days 76–90 post-randomization. Secondary and exploratory outcomes included time in hypoglycemia, hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)), clinical outcome, quality of life (QOL), and cost effectiveness. RESULTS: Of 141 participants randomly assigned (median age 63 years; interquartile range 53, 70), 73% of whom were men, isCGM was associated with increased TIR by 17 min/day (95% credible interval −105 to +153 min/day), with 59% probability of benefit. Users of isCGM showed lower hypoglycemic exposure (<3.9 mmol/L) at days 76–90 (−80 min/day; 95% CI −118, −43), also evident at days 16–30 (−28 min/day; 95% CI −92, 2). Compared with baseline, HbA(1c) showed similar reductions of 7 mmol/mol at 3 months in both study arms. Combined glycemic emergencies and mortality occurred in four isCGM and seven SMBG study participants. QOL measures marginally favored isCGM, and the intervention proved to be cost effective. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with SMBG, isCGM in T2D individuals with MI marginally increases TIR and significantly reduces hypoglycemic exposure while equally improving HbA(1c), explaining its cost effectiveness. Studies are required to understand whether these glycemic differences translate into longer-term clinical benefit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9887626
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Diabetes Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98876262023-02-08 Multicenter Randomized Trial of Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes and Recent-Onset Acute Myocardial Infarction: Results of the LIBERATES Trial Ajjan, Ramzi A. Heller, Simon R. Everett, Colin C. Vargas-Palacios, Armando Higham, Ruchi Sharples, Linda Gorog, Diana A. Rogers, Alice Reynolds, Catherine Fernandez, Catherine Rodrigues, Pedro Sathyapalan, Thozhukat Storey, Robert F. Stocken, Deborah D. Diabetes Care Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk OBJECTIVE: To analyze the impact of modern glucose-monitoring strategies on glycemic and patient-related outcomes in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and recent myocardial infarction (MI) and assess cost effectiveness. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: LIBERATES was a multicenter two-arm randomized trial comparing self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) with intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM), also known as flash CGM, in individuals with T2D and recent MI, treated with insulin and/or a sulphonylurea before hospital admission. The primary outcome measure was time in range (TIR) (glucose 3.9–10 mmol/L/day) on days 76–90 post-randomization. Secondary and exploratory outcomes included time in hypoglycemia, hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)), clinical outcome, quality of life (QOL), and cost effectiveness. RESULTS: Of 141 participants randomly assigned (median age 63 years; interquartile range 53, 70), 73% of whom were men, isCGM was associated with increased TIR by 17 min/day (95% credible interval −105 to +153 min/day), with 59% probability of benefit. Users of isCGM showed lower hypoglycemic exposure (<3.9 mmol/L) at days 76–90 (−80 min/day; 95% CI −118, −43), also evident at days 16–30 (−28 min/day; 95% CI −92, 2). Compared with baseline, HbA(1c) showed similar reductions of 7 mmol/mol at 3 months in both study arms. Combined glycemic emergencies and mortality occurred in four isCGM and seven SMBG study participants. QOL measures marginally favored isCGM, and the intervention proved to be cost effective. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with SMBG, isCGM in T2D individuals with MI marginally increases TIR and significantly reduces hypoglycemic exposure while equally improving HbA(1c), explaining its cost effectiveness. Studies are required to understand whether these glycemic differences translate into longer-term clinical benefit. American Diabetes Association 2023-02 2022-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9887626/ /pubmed/36516054 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc22-1219 Text en © 2023 by the American Diabetes Association https://www.diabetesjournals.org/journals/pages/licenseReaders may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at https://www.diabetesjournals.org/journals/pages/license.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk
Ajjan, Ramzi A.
Heller, Simon R.
Everett, Colin C.
Vargas-Palacios, Armando
Higham, Ruchi
Sharples, Linda
Gorog, Diana A.
Rogers, Alice
Reynolds, Catherine
Fernandez, Catherine
Rodrigues, Pedro
Sathyapalan, Thozhukat
Storey, Robert F.
Stocken, Deborah D.
Multicenter Randomized Trial of Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes and Recent-Onset Acute Myocardial Infarction: Results of the LIBERATES Trial
title Multicenter Randomized Trial of Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes and Recent-Onset Acute Myocardial Infarction: Results of the LIBERATES Trial
title_full Multicenter Randomized Trial of Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes and Recent-Onset Acute Myocardial Infarction: Results of the LIBERATES Trial
title_fullStr Multicenter Randomized Trial of Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes and Recent-Onset Acute Myocardial Infarction: Results of the LIBERATES Trial
title_full_unstemmed Multicenter Randomized Trial of Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes and Recent-Onset Acute Myocardial Infarction: Results of the LIBERATES Trial
title_short Multicenter Randomized Trial of Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes and Recent-Onset Acute Myocardial Infarction: Results of the LIBERATES Trial
title_sort multicenter randomized trial of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring versus self-monitoring of blood glucose in individuals with type 2 diabetes and recent-onset acute myocardial infarction: results of the liberates trial
topic Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9887626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36516054
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc22-1219
work_keys_str_mv AT ajjanramzia multicenterrandomizedtrialofintermittentlyscannedcontinuousglucosemonitoringversusselfmonitoringofbloodglucoseinindividualswithtype2diabetesandrecentonsetacutemyocardialinfarctionresultsoftheliberatestrial
AT hellersimonr multicenterrandomizedtrialofintermittentlyscannedcontinuousglucosemonitoringversusselfmonitoringofbloodglucoseinindividualswithtype2diabetesandrecentonsetacutemyocardialinfarctionresultsoftheliberatestrial
AT everettcolinc multicenterrandomizedtrialofintermittentlyscannedcontinuousglucosemonitoringversusselfmonitoringofbloodglucoseinindividualswithtype2diabetesandrecentonsetacutemyocardialinfarctionresultsoftheliberatestrial
AT vargaspalaciosarmando multicenterrandomizedtrialofintermittentlyscannedcontinuousglucosemonitoringversusselfmonitoringofbloodglucoseinindividualswithtype2diabetesandrecentonsetacutemyocardialinfarctionresultsoftheliberatestrial
AT highamruchi multicenterrandomizedtrialofintermittentlyscannedcontinuousglucosemonitoringversusselfmonitoringofbloodglucoseinindividualswithtype2diabetesandrecentonsetacutemyocardialinfarctionresultsoftheliberatestrial
AT sharpleslinda multicenterrandomizedtrialofintermittentlyscannedcontinuousglucosemonitoringversusselfmonitoringofbloodglucoseinindividualswithtype2diabetesandrecentonsetacutemyocardialinfarctionresultsoftheliberatestrial
AT gorogdianaa multicenterrandomizedtrialofintermittentlyscannedcontinuousglucosemonitoringversusselfmonitoringofbloodglucoseinindividualswithtype2diabetesandrecentonsetacutemyocardialinfarctionresultsoftheliberatestrial
AT rogersalice multicenterrandomizedtrialofintermittentlyscannedcontinuousglucosemonitoringversusselfmonitoringofbloodglucoseinindividualswithtype2diabetesandrecentonsetacutemyocardialinfarctionresultsoftheliberatestrial
AT reynoldscatherine multicenterrandomizedtrialofintermittentlyscannedcontinuousglucosemonitoringversusselfmonitoringofbloodglucoseinindividualswithtype2diabetesandrecentonsetacutemyocardialinfarctionresultsoftheliberatestrial
AT fernandezcatherine multicenterrandomizedtrialofintermittentlyscannedcontinuousglucosemonitoringversusselfmonitoringofbloodglucoseinindividualswithtype2diabetesandrecentonsetacutemyocardialinfarctionresultsoftheliberatestrial
AT rodriguespedro multicenterrandomizedtrialofintermittentlyscannedcontinuousglucosemonitoringversusselfmonitoringofbloodglucoseinindividualswithtype2diabetesandrecentonsetacutemyocardialinfarctionresultsoftheliberatestrial
AT sathyapalanthozhukat multicenterrandomizedtrialofintermittentlyscannedcontinuousglucosemonitoringversusselfmonitoringofbloodglucoseinindividualswithtype2diabetesandrecentonsetacutemyocardialinfarctionresultsoftheliberatestrial
AT storeyrobertf multicenterrandomizedtrialofintermittentlyscannedcontinuousglucosemonitoringversusselfmonitoringofbloodglucoseinindividualswithtype2diabetesandrecentonsetacutemyocardialinfarctionresultsoftheliberatestrial
AT stockendeborahd multicenterrandomizedtrialofintermittentlyscannedcontinuousglucosemonitoringversusselfmonitoringofbloodglucoseinindividualswithtype2diabetesandrecentonsetacutemyocardialinfarctionresultsoftheliberatestrial