Cargando…

Variation in quality of care by medical institute level in China: a systematic review protocol

INTRODUCTION: Quality variation has been widely witnessed and discussed in China. However, limited evidence reveals quality gaps by the medical institute level, especially between hospitals and primary care institutes. This systematic review will synthesise the available evidence on quality variatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Quan, Tu, Xi, Fu, Yaqun, Zhang, Jiawei, Wei, Xia, Zhu, Zheng, Wang, Ting, Yang, Li
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9887710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36717137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067683
_version_ 1784880392904376320
author Wang, Quan
Tu, Xi
Fu, Yaqun
Zhang, Jiawei
Wei, Xia
Zhu, Zheng
Wang, Ting
Yang, Li
author_facet Wang, Quan
Tu, Xi
Fu, Yaqun
Zhang, Jiawei
Wei, Xia
Zhu, Zheng
Wang, Ting
Yang, Li
author_sort Wang, Quan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Quality variation has been widely witnessed and discussed in China. However, limited evidence reveals quality gaps by the medical institute level, especially between hospitals and primary care institutes. This systematic review will synthesise the available evidence on quality variation between medical institutes at different levels in China. By adopting a quality framework, we will also explore the detailed domains (structure, process and outcomes) and dimensions (safety, effectiveness, timeliness, patient-centredness, efficiency, integration and equity) of quality gaps. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: An extensive literature search will be conducted on eight key electronic databases: MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, EMBASE, ProQuest, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and WANFANG database. The Grey Matter Checklist will be used to screen relevant grey literature. The publication time limit should be before 31 December 2022 when we plan to conduct a literature search. All kinds of studies that revealed the quality difference between medical institutes at different levels will be included, no matter if quality improvement intervention is involved. All quality measures and indicators will be recorded and sorted into appropriate domains and dimensions. For those studies that took the completion rate of standard operations to assess the quality, we will also record the name of the clinical pathways, guidelines or checklists used. Two reviewers will independently perform the study selection, data extraction and quality assessment process. A narrative or quantitative synthesis will be performed based on the available data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not applicable. The results of this study will be submitted to a widely accepted peer-review journal. The findings will also be used to inform administration about quality gaps by different medical institute levels and, therefore, help them to design policies that will minimise the quality variation. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022345933.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9887710
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98877102023-02-01 Variation in quality of care by medical institute level in China: a systematic review protocol Wang, Quan Tu, Xi Fu, Yaqun Zhang, Jiawei Wei, Xia Zhu, Zheng Wang, Ting Yang, Li BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: Quality variation has been widely witnessed and discussed in China. However, limited evidence reveals quality gaps by the medical institute level, especially between hospitals and primary care institutes. This systematic review will synthesise the available evidence on quality variation between medical institutes at different levels in China. By adopting a quality framework, we will also explore the detailed domains (structure, process and outcomes) and dimensions (safety, effectiveness, timeliness, patient-centredness, efficiency, integration and equity) of quality gaps. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: An extensive literature search will be conducted on eight key electronic databases: MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, EMBASE, ProQuest, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and WANFANG database. The Grey Matter Checklist will be used to screen relevant grey literature. The publication time limit should be before 31 December 2022 when we plan to conduct a literature search. All kinds of studies that revealed the quality difference between medical institutes at different levels will be included, no matter if quality improvement intervention is involved. All quality measures and indicators will be recorded and sorted into appropriate domains and dimensions. For those studies that took the completion rate of standard operations to assess the quality, we will also record the name of the clinical pathways, guidelines or checklists used. Two reviewers will independently perform the study selection, data extraction and quality assessment process. A narrative or quantitative synthesis will be performed based on the available data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not applicable. The results of this study will be submitted to a widely accepted peer-review journal. The findings will also be used to inform administration about quality gaps by different medical institute levels and, therefore, help them to design policies that will minimise the quality variation. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022345933. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9887710/ /pubmed/36717137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067683 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Wang, Quan
Tu, Xi
Fu, Yaqun
Zhang, Jiawei
Wei, Xia
Zhu, Zheng
Wang, Ting
Yang, Li
Variation in quality of care by medical institute level in China: a systematic review protocol
title Variation in quality of care by medical institute level in China: a systematic review protocol
title_full Variation in quality of care by medical institute level in China: a systematic review protocol
title_fullStr Variation in quality of care by medical institute level in China: a systematic review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Variation in quality of care by medical institute level in China: a systematic review protocol
title_short Variation in quality of care by medical institute level in China: a systematic review protocol
title_sort variation in quality of care by medical institute level in china: a systematic review protocol
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9887710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36717137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067683
work_keys_str_mv AT wangquan variationinqualityofcarebymedicalinstitutelevelinchinaasystematicreviewprotocol
AT tuxi variationinqualityofcarebymedicalinstitutelevelinchinaasystematicreviewprotocol
AT fuyaqun variationinqualityofcarebymedicalinstitutelevelinchinaasystematicreviewprotocol
AT zhangjiawei variationinqualityofcarebymedicalinstitutelevelinchinaasystematicreviewprotocol
AT weixia variationinqualityofcarebymedicalinstitutelevelinchinaasystematicreviewprotocol
AT zhuzheng variationinqualityofcarebymedicalinstitutelevelinchinaasystematicreviewprotocol
AT wangting variationinqualityofcarebymedicalinstitutelevelinchinaasystematicreviewprotocol
AT yangli variationinqualityofcarebymedicalinstitutelevelinchinaasystematicreviewprotocol