Cargando…

Protocol for a confirmatory trial of the effectiveness and safety of palliative arterial embolization for painful bone metastases

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) has long been used for hemostasis of traumatic or postoperative hemorrhage and embolization of tumors. Previous retrospective studies of TAE for painful bone metastases showed 60%–80% pain reduction with a median time to response of 1–2 days. Com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zenda, Sadamoto, Arai, Yasunori, Sugawara, Shunsuke, Inaba, Yoshitaka, Hashimoto, Kazuki, Yamamoto, Kouji, Saigusa, Yusuke, Kawaguchi, Takashi, Shimada, Sanae, Yokoyama, Marie, Miyaji, Tempei, Okano, Tomoka, Nakamura, Naoki, Kobayashi, Eisuke, Takagi, Tatsuya, Matsumoto, Yoshihisa, Uchitomi, Yosuke, Sone, Miyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9887749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36721103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10538-6
_version_ 1784880399450636288
author Zenda, Sadamoto
Arai, Yasunori
Sugawara, Shunsuke
Inaba, Yoshitaka
Hashimoto, Kazuki
Yamamoto, Kouji
Saigusa, Yusuke
Kawaguchi, Takashi
Shimada, Sanae
Yokoyama, Marie
Miyaji, Tempei
Okano, Tomoka
Nakamura, Naoki
Kobayashi, Eisuke
Takagi, Tatsuya
Matsumoto, Yoshihisa
Uchitomi, Yosuke
Sone, Miyuki
author_facet Zenda, Sadamoto
Arai, Yasunori
Sugawara, Shunsuke
Inaba, Yoshitaka
Hashimoto, Kazuki
Yamamoto, Kouji
Saigusa, Yusuke
Kawaguchi, Takashi
Shimada, Sanae
Yokoyama, Marie
Miyaji, Tempei
Okano, Tomoka
Nakamura, Naoki
Kobayashi, Eisuke
Takagi, Tatsuya
Matsumoto, Yoshihisa
Uchitomi, Yosuke
Sone, Miyuki
author_sort Zenda, Sadamoto
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) has long been used for hemostasis of traumatic or postoperative hemorrhage and embolization of tumors. Previous retrospective studies of TAE for painful bone metastases showed 60%–80% pain reduction with a median time to response of 1–2 days. Compared with radiotherapy and bisphosphonates, time to response appeared earlier than that of radiotherapy or bone-modifying agents. However, few prospective studies have examined TAE for this indication. Here, we describe the protocol for a confirmatory study designed to clarify the efficacy and safety profile of TAE. METHODS: This study will be a multicenter, single-arm confirmatory study (phase 2–3 design). Patients with painful bone metastases from any primary tumor are eligible for enrollment. TAE will be the main intervention. Following puncture of the femoral artery under local anesthesia and insertion of an angiographic sheath, angiography will confirm that the injected region includes tumor vasculature. Catheter position will be adjusted so that the embolization range does not include non-target tissues. Spherical embolic material will then be slowly injected into the artery to embolize it. The primary endpoint (efficacy) is the proportion of subjects with pain relief at 72 h after TAE and the secondary endpoint (safety) is the incidence of all NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 Grade 4 adverse events and Grade ≥ 3 necrosis of the central nervous system. DISCUSSION: If the primary and secondary endpoints are met, TAE can be a treatment choice for painful bone metastases. Trial registry number is UMIN-CTR ID: UMIN000040794. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is ongoing, and patients are currently being enrolled. Enrollment started in March 2021. A total of 36 patients have participated as of Aug 2022. Protocol Version: Ver1.4, 13/07/2022.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9887749
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98877492023-02-01 Protocol for a confirmatory trial of the effectiveness and safety of palliative arterial embolization for painful bone metastases Zenda, Sadamoto Arai, Yasunori Sugawara, Shunsuke Inaba, Yoshitaka Hashimoto, Kazuki Yamamoto, Kouji Saigusa, Yusuke Kawaguchi, Takashi Shimada, Sanae Yokoyama, Marie Miyaji, Tempei Okano, Tomoka Nakamura, Naoki Kobayashi, Eisuke Takagi, Tatsuya Matsumoto, Yoshihisa Uchitomi, Yosuke Sone, Miyuki BMC Cancer Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) has long been used for hemostasis of traumatic or postoperative hemorrhage and embolization of tumors. Previous retrospective studies of TAE for painful bone metastases showed 60%–80% pain reduction with a median time to response of 1–2 days. Compared with radiotherapy and bisphosphonates, time to response appeared earlier than that of radiotherapy or bone-modifying agents. However, few prospective studies have examined TAE for this indication. Here, we describe the protocol for a confirmatory study designed to clarify the efficacy and safety profile of TAE. METHODS: This study will be a multicenter, single-arm confirmatory study (phase 2–3 design). Patients with painful bone metastases from any primary tumor are eligible for enrollment. TAE will be the main intervention. Following puncture of the femoral artery under local anesthesia and insertion of an angiographic sheath, angiography will confirm that the injected region includes tumor vasculature. Catheter position will be adjusted so that the embolization range does not include non-target tissues. Spherical embolic material will then be slowly injected into the artery to embolize it. The primary endpoint (efficacy) is the proportion of subjects with pain relief at 72 h after TAE and the secondary endpoint (safety) is the incidence of all NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 Grade 4 adverse events and Grade ≥ 3 necrosis of the central nervous system. DISCUSSION: If the primary and secondary endpoints are met, TAE can be a treatment choice for painful bone metastases. Trial registry number is UMIN-CTR ID: UMIN000040794. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is ongoing, and patients are currently being enrolled. Enrollment started in March 2021. A total of 36 patients have participated as of Aug 2022. Protocol Version: Ver1.4, 13/07/2022. BioMed Central 2023-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9887749/ /pubmed/36721103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10538-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Zenda, Sadamoto
Arai, Yasunori
Sugawara, Shunsuke
Inaba, Yoshitaka
Hashimoto, Kazuki
Yamamoto, Kouji
Saigusa, Yusuke
Kawaguchi, Takashi
Shimada, Sanae
Yokoyama, Marie
Miyaji, Tempei
Okano, Tomoka
Nakamura, Naoki
Kobayashi, Eisuke
Takagi, Tatsuya
Matsumoto, Yoshihisa
Uchitomi, Yosuke
Sone, Miyuki
Protocol for a confirmatory trial of the effectiveness and safety of palliative arterial embolization for painful bone metastases
title Protocol for a confirmatory trial of the effectiveness and safety of palliative arterial embolization for painful bone metastases
title_full Protocol for a confirmatory trial of the effectiveness and safety of palliative arterial embolization for painful bone metastases
title_fullStr Protocol for a confirmatory trial of the effectiveness and safety of palliative arterial embolization for painful bone metastases
title_full_unstemmed Protocol for a confirmatory trial of the effectiveness and safety of palliative arterial embolization for painful bone metastases
title_short Protocol for a confirmatory trial of the effectiveness and safety of palliative arterial embolization for painful bone metastases
title_sort protocol for a confirmatory trial of the effectiveness and safety of palliative arterial embolization for painful bone metastases
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9887749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36721103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10538-6
work_keys_str_mv AT zendasadamoto protocolforaconfirmatorytrialoftheeffectivenessandsafetyofpalliativearterialembolizationforpainfulbonemetastases
AT araiyasunori protocolforaconfirmatorytrialoftheeffectivenessandsafetyofpalliativearterialembolizationforpainfulbonemetastases
AT sugawarashunsuke protocolforaconfirmatorytrialoftheeffectivenessandsafetyofpalliativearterialembolizationforpainfulbonemetastases
AT inabayoshitaka protocolforaconfirmatorytrialoftheeffectivenessandsafetyofpalliativearterialembolizationforpainfulbonemetastases
AT hashimotokazuki protocolforaconfirmatorytrialoftheeffectivenessandsafetyofpalliativearterialembolizationforpainfulbonemetastases
AT yamamotokouji protocolforaconfirmatorytrialoftheeffectivenessandsafetyofpalliativearterialembolizationforpainfulbonemetastases
AT saigusayusuke protocolforaconfirmatorytrialoftheeffectivenessandsafetyofpalliativearterialembolizationforpainfulbonemetastases
AT kawaguchitakashi protocolforaconfirmatorytrialoftheeffectivenessandsafetyofpalliativearterialembolizationforpainfulbonemetastases
AT shimadasanae protocolforaconfirmatorytrialoftheeffectivenessandsafetyofpalliativearterialembolizationforpainfulbonemetastases
AT yokoyamamarie protocolforaconfirmatorytrialoftheeffectivenessandsafetyofpalliativearterialembolizationforpainfulbonemetastases
AT miyajitempei protocolforaconfirmatorytrialoftheeffectivenessandsafetyofpalliativearterialembolizationforpainfulbonemetastases
AT okanotomoka protocolforaconfirmatorytrialoftheeffectivenessandsafetyofpalliativearterialembolizationforpainfulbonemetastases
AT nakamuranaoki protocolforaconfirmatorytrialoftheeffectivenessandsafetyofpalliativearterialembolizationforpainfulbonemetastases
AT kobayashieisuke protocolforaconfirmatorytrialoftheeffectivenessandsafetyofpalliativearterialembolizationforpainfulbonemetastases
AT takagitatsuya protocolforaconfirmatorytrialoftheeffectivenessandsafetyofpalliativearterialembolizationforpainfulbonemetastases
AT matsumotoyoshihisa protocolforaconfirmatorytrialoftheeffectivenessandsafetyofpalliativearterialembolizationforpainfulbonemetastases
AT uchitomiyosuke protocolforaconfirmatorytrialoftheeffectivenessandsafetyofpalliativearterialembolizationforpainfulbonemetastases
AT sonemiyuki protocolforaconfirmatorytrialoftheeffectivenessandsafetyofpalliativearterialembolizationforpainfulbonemetastases
AT protocolforaconfirmatorytrialoftheeffectivenessandsafetyofpalliativearterialembolizationforpainfulbonemetastases