Cargando…
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of MicroShunt implantation versus standard trabeculectomy for open-angle glaucoma (a SIGHT study): study protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Trabeculectomy is the “gold standard” initial surgical procedure for open-angle glaucoma worldwide. During the last decade, the introduction of less invasive procedures, including new bleb-forming surgery such as the MicroShunt, has altered the approach of glaucoma management. At present...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9887798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36721130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02734-y |
_version_ | 1784880409359679488 |
---|---|
author | Scheres, Lotte M. J. van den Biggelaar, Frank J. H. M. Winkens, Bjorn Kujovic-Aleksov, Stefani Müskens, Rogier P. H. M. de Waard, Peter W. T. de Crom, Ronald M. P. C. Ernest, Paul J. G. Pijl, Benjamin J. Ramdas, Wishal D. van Rijn, Laurentius J. Tan, Annelie Dirksen, Carmen D. Beckers, Henny J. M. |
author_facet | Scheres, Lotte M. J. van den Biggelaar, Frank J. H. M. Winkens, Bjorn Kujovic-Aleksov, Stefani Müskens, Rogier P. H. M. de Waard, Peter W. T. de Crom, Ronald M. P. C. Ernest, Paul J. G. Pijl, Benjamin J. Ramdas, Wishal D. van Rijn, Laurentius J. Tan, Annelie Dirksen, Carmen D. Beckers, Henny J. M. |
author_sort | Scheres, Lotte M. J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Trabeculectomy is the “gold standard” initial surgical procedure for open-angle glaucoma worldwide. During the last decade, the introduction of less invasive procedures, including new bleb-forming surgery such as the MicroShunt, has altered the approach of glaucoma management. At present, there is insufficient evidence comparing the effectiveness between these procedures nor versus trabeculectomy. Furthermore, there is no data available on patient impact and cost-effectiveness. This study aims to address this gap in evidence and establish whether MicroShunt implantation is non-inferior compared to trabeculectomy with regard to effectiveness and whether it is cost-effective. METHODS: A multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial (RCT) studying open-angle glaucoma with an indication for surgery will be conducted. Patients with previous ocular surgery except for phacoemulsification are excluded, as are patients with ocular comorbidity compromising the visual field or requiring a combined procedure. After informed consent is obtained, patients will be randomly allocated to the intervention, a PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt implantation, or the control group, trabeculectomy, using block randomisation (blocks of 2, 4 or 6 patients). In total, 124 patients will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by centre. The primary endpoint will be intraocular pressure (IOP) one year after surgery. Secondary outcomes include IOP-lowering medication use, treatment failure, visual acuity, visual field progression, additional interventions, adverse events, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and cost-effectiveness. Study outcomes will be measured up to 12 months postoperatively. DISCUSSION: This study protocol describes the design of a multicentre non-inferiority randomised controlled trial. To this date, cost-effectiveness studies evaluating the MicroShunt have not been undertaken. This multicentre RCT will provide more insight into whether MicroShunt implantation is non-inferior compared to standard trabeculectomy regarding postoperative IOP and whether MicroShunt implantation is cost-effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT03931564, Registered 30 April 2019. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9887798 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98877982023-02-01 Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of MicroShunt implantation versus standard trabeculectomy for open-angle glaucoma (a SIGHT study): study protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial Scheres, Lotte M. J. van den Biggelaar, Frank J. H. M. Winkens, Bjorn Kujovic-Aleksov, Stefani Müskens, Rogier P. H. M. de Waard, Peter W. T. de Crom, Ronald M. P. C. Ernest, Paul J. G. Pijl, Benjamin J. Ramdas, Wishal D. van Rijn, Laurentius J. Tan, Annelie Dirksen, Carmen D. Beckers, Henny J. M. BMC Ophthalmol Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Trabeculectomy is the “gold standard” initial surgical procedure for open-angle glaucoma worldwide. During the last decade, the introduction of less invasive procedures, including new bleb-forming surgery such as the MicroShunt, has altered the approach of glaucoma management. At present, there is insufficient evidence comparing the effectiveness between these procedures nor versus trabeculectomy. Furthermore, there is no data available on patient impact and cost-effectiveness. This study aims to address this gap in evidence and establish whether MicroShunt implantation is non-inferior compared to trabeculectomy with regard to effectiveness and whether it is cost-effective. METHODS: A multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial (RCT) studying open-angle glaucoma with an indication for surgery will be conducted. Patients with previous ocular surgery except for phacoemulsification are excluded, as are patients with ocular comorbidity compromising the visual field or requiring a combined procedure. After informed consent is obtained, patients will be randomly allocated to the intervention, a PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt implantation, or the control group, trabeculectomy, using block randomisation (blocks of 2, 4 or 6 patients). In total, 124 patients will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by centre. The primary endpoint will be intraocular pressure (IOP) one year after surgery. Secondary outcomes include IOP-lowering medication use, treatment failure, visual acuity, visual field progression, additional interventions, adverse events, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and cost-effectiveness. Study outcomes will be measured up to 12 months postoperatively. DISCUSSION: This study protocol describes the design of a multicentre non-inferiority randomised controlled trial. To this date, cost-effectiveness studies evaluating the MicroShunt have not been undertaken. This multicentre RCT will provide more insight into whether MicroShunt implantation is non-inferior compared to standard trabeculectomy regarding postoperative IOP and whether MicroShunt implantation is cost-effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT03931564, Registered 30 April 2019. BioMed Central 2023-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9887798/ /pubmed/36721130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02734-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Scheres, Lotte M. J. van den Biggelaar, Frank J. H. M. Winkens, Bjorn Kujovic-Aleksov, Stefani Müskens, Rogier P. H. M. de Waard, Peter W. T. de Crom, Ronald M. P. C. Ernest, Paul J. G. Pijl, Benjamin J. Ramdas, Wishal D. van Rijn, Laurentius J. Tan, Annelie Dirksen, Carmen D. Beckers, Henny J. M. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of MicroShunt implantation versus standard trabeculectomy for open-angle glaucoma (a SIGHT study): study protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial |
title | Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of MicroShunt implantation versus standard trabeculectomy for open-angle glaucoma (a SIGHT study): study protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of MicroShunt implantation versus standard trabeculectomy for open-angle glaucoma (a SIGHT study): study protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of MicroShunt implantation versus standard trabeculectomy for open-angle glaucoma (a SIGHT study): study protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of MicroShunt implantation versus standard trabeculectomy for open-angle glaucoma (a SIGHT study): study protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of MicroShunt implantation versus standard trabeculectomy for open-angle glaucoma (a SIGHT study): study protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of microshunt implantation versus standard trabeculectomy for open-angle glaucoma (a sight study): study protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9887798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36721130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02734-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schereslottemj effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofmicroshuntimplantationversusstandardtrabeculectomyforopenangleglaucomaasightstudystudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT vandenbiggelaarfrankjhm effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofmicroshuntimplantationversusstandardtrabeculectomyforopenangleglaucomaasightstudystudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT winkensbjorn effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofmicroshuntimplantationversusstandardtrabeculectomyforopenangleglaucomaasightstudystudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kujovicaleksovstefani effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofmicroshuntimplantationversusstandardtrabeculectomyforopenangleglaucomaasightstudystudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT muskensrogierphm effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofmicroshuntimplantationversusstandardtrabeculectomyforopenangleglaucomaasightstudystudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT dewaardpeterwt effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofmicroshuntimplantationversusstandardtrabeculectomyforopenangleglaucomaasightstudystudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT decromronaldmpc effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofmicroshuntimplantationversusstandardtrabeculectomyforopenangleglaucomaasightstudystudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT ernestpauljg effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofmicroshuntimplantationversusstandardtrabeculectomyforopenangleglaucomaasightstudystudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT pijlbenjaminj effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofmicroshuntimplantationversusstandardtrabeculectomyforopenangleglaucomaasightstudystudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT ramdaswishald effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofmicroshuntimplantationversusstandardtrabeculectomyforopenangleglaucomaasightstudystudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT vanrijnlaurentiusj effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofmicroshuntimplantationversusstandardtrabeculectomyforopenangleglaucomaasightstudystudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT tanannelie effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofmicroshuntimplantationversusstandardtrabeculectomyforopenangleglaucomaasightstudystudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT dirksencarmend effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofmicroshuntimplantationversusstandardtrabeculectomyforopenangleglaucomaasightstudystudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT beckershennyjm effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofmicroshuntimplantationversusstandardtrabeculectomyforopenangleglaucomaasightstudystudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial |