Cargando…

A population-based investigation: How to identify high-risk T1-2N0 esophageal cancer patients?

PURPOSE: Newly diagnosed T1-2N0 esophageal cancer (EC) is generally deemed as early local disease, with distant metastases (DM) easily overlooked. This retrospective study aimed to describe the metastatic patterns, identify risk factors and established a risk prediction model for DM in T1-2N0 EC pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luo, Peng, Wu, Jie, Chen, Xiankai, Yang, Yafan, Zhang, Ruixiang, Qi, Xiuzhu, Li, Yin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9888256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36733675
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1003487
_version_ 1784880501079670784
author Luo, Peng
Wu, Jie
Chen, Xiankai
Yang, Yafan
Zhang, Ruixiang
Qi, Xiuzhu
Li, Yin
author_facet Luo, Peng
Wu, Jie
Chen, Xiankai
Yang, Yafan
Zhang, Ruixiang
Qi, Xiuzhu
Li, Yin
author_sort Luo, Peng
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Newly diagnosed T1-2N0 esophageal cancer (EC) is generally deemed as early local disease, with distant metastases (DM) easily overlooked. This retrospective study aimed to describe the metastatic patterns, identify risk factors and established a risk prediction model for DM in T1-2N0 EC patients. METHODS: A total of 4623 T1-2N0 EC patients were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database from 2004 to 2018. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for DM. A nomogram was developed for presentation of the final model. RESULTS: Of 4623 T1-2N0 patients, 4062 (87.9%) had M0 disease and 561 (12.1%) had M1 disease. The most common metastatic site was liver (n = 156, 47.3%), followed by lung (n = 89, 27.0%), bone (n = 70, 21.2%) and brain (n = 15, 4.5%). Variables independently associated with DM included age at diagnosis, gender, tumor grade, primary site, tumor size and T stage. A nomogram based on the variables had a good predictive accuracy (area under the curve: 0.750). Independent risk factors for bone metastases (BoM), brain metastases (BrM), liver metastases (LiM) and lung metastases (LuM) were identified, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We identified independent predictive factors for DM, as well as for BoM, BrM, LiM and LuM. Above all, a practical and convenient nomogram with a great accuracy to predict DM probability for T1-2N0 EC patients was established.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9888256
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98882562023-02-01 A population-based investigation: How to identify high-risk T1-2N0 esophageal cancer patients? Luo, Peng Wu, Jie Chen, Xiankai Yang, Yafan Zhang, Ruixiang Qi, Xiuzhu Li, Yin Front Surg Surgery PURPOSE: Newly diagnosed T1-2N0 esophageal cancer (EC) is generally deemed as early local disease, with distant metastases (DM) easily overlooked. This retrospective study aimed to describe the metastatic patterns, identify risk factors and established a risk prediction model for DM in T1-2N0 EC patients. METHODS: A total of 4623 T1-2N0 EC patients were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database from 2004 to 2018. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for DM. A nomogram was developed for presentation of the final model. RESULTS: Of 4623 T1-2N0 patients, 4062 (87.9%) had M0 disease and 561 (12.1%) had M1 disease. The most common metastatic site was liver (n = 156, 47.3%), followed by lung (n = 89, 27.0%), bone (n = 70, 21.2%) and brain (n = 15, 4.5%). Variables independently associated with DM included age at diagnosis, gender, tumor grade, primary site, tumor size and T stage. A nomogram based on the variables had a good predictive accuracy (area under the curve: 0.750). Independent risk factors for bone metastases (BoM), brain metastases (BrM), liver metastases (LiM) and lung metastases (LuM) were identified, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We identified independent predictive factors for DM, as well as for BoM, BrM, LiM and LuM. Above all, a practical and convenient nomogram with a great accuracy to predict DM probability for T1-2N0 EC patients was established. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9888256/ /pubmed/36733675 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1003487 Text en © 2023 Luo, Wu, Chen, Yang, Zhang, Qi and Li. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Luo, Peng
Wu, Jie
Chen, Xiankai
Yang, Yafan
Zhang, Ruixiang
Qi, Xiuzhu
Li, Yin
A population-based investigation: How to identify high-risk T1-2N0 esophageal cancer patients?
title A population-based investigation: How to identify high-risk T1-2N0 esophageal cancer patients?
title_full A population-based investigation: How to identify high-risk T1-2N0 esophageal cancer patients?
title_fullStr A population-based investigation: How to identify high-risk T1-2N0 esophageal cancer patients?
title_full_unstemmed A population-based investigation: How to identify high-risk T1-2N0 esophageal cancer patients?
title_short A population-based investigation: How to identify high-risk T1-2N0 esophageal cancer patients?
title_sort population-based investigation: how to identify high-risk t1-2n0 esophageal cancer patients?
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9888256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36733675
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1003487
work_keys_str_mv AT luopeng apopulationbasedinvestigationhowtoidentifyhighriskt12n0esophagealcancerpatients
AT wujie apopulationbasedinvestigationhowtoidentifyhighriskt12n0esophagealcancerpatients
AT chenxiankai apopulationbasedinvestigationhowtoidentifyhighriskt12n0esophagealcancerpatients
AT yangyafan apopulationbasedinvestigationhowtoidentifyhighriskt12n0esophagealcancerpatients
AT zhangruixiang apopulationbasedinvestigationhowtoidentifyhighriskt12n0esophagealcancerpatients
AT qixiuzhu apopulationbasedinvestigationhowtoidentifyhighriskt12n0esophagealcancerpatients
AT liyin apopulationbasedinvestigationhowtoidentifyhighriskt12n0esophagealcancerpatients
AT luopeng populationbasedinvestigationhowtoidentifyhighriskt12n0esophagealcancerpatients
AT wujie populationbasedinvestigationhowtoidentifyhighriskt12n0esophagealcancerpatients
AT chenxiankai populationbasedinvestigationhowtoidentifyhighriskt12n0esophagealcancerpatients
AT yangyafan populationbasedinvestigationhowtoidentifyhighriskt12n0esophagealcancerpatients
AT zhangruixiang populationbasedinvestigationhowtoidentifyhighriskt12n0esophagealcancerpatients
AT qixiuzhu populationbasedinvestigationhowtoidentifyhighriskt12n0esophagealcancerpatients
AT liyin populationbasedinvestigationhowtoidentifyhighriskt12n0esophagealcancerpatients