Cargando…
A population-based investigation: How to identify high-risk T1-2N0 esophageal cancer patients?
PURPOSE: Newly diagnosed T1-2N0 esophageal cancer (EC) is generally deemed as early local disease, with distant metastases (DM) easily overlooked. This retrospective study aimed to describe the metastatic patterns, identify risk factors and established a risk prediction model for DM in T1-2N0 EC pat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9888256/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36733675 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1003487 |
_version_ | 1784880501079670784 |
---|---|
author | Luo, Peng Wu, Jie Chen, Xiankai Yang, Yafan Zhang, Ruixiang Qi, Xiuzhu Li, Yin |
author_facet | Luo, Peng Wu, Jie Chen, Xiankai Yang, Yafan Zhang, Ruixiang Qi, Xiuzhu Li, Yin |
author_sort | Luo, Peng |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Newly diagnosed T1-2N0 esophageal cancer (EC) is generally deemed as early local disease, with distant metastases (DM) easily overlooked. This retrospective study aimed to describe the metastatic patterns, identify risk factors and established a risk prediction model for DM in T1-2N0 EC patients. METHODS: A total of 4623 T1-2N0 EC patients were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database from 2004 to 2018. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for DM. A nomogram was developed for presentation of the final model. RESULTS: Of 4623 T1-2N0 patients, 4062 (87.9%) had M0 disease and 561 (12.1%) had M1 disease. The most common metastatic site was liver (n = 156, 47.3%), followed by lung (n = 89, 27.0%), bone (n = 70, 21.2%) and brain (n = 15, 4.5%). Variables independently associated with DM included age at diagnosis, gender, tumor grade, primary site, tumor size and T stage. A nomogram based on the variables had a good predictive accuracy (area under the curve: 0.750). Independent risk factors for bone metastases (BoM), brain metastases (BrM), liver metastases (LiM) and lung metastases (LuM) were identified, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We identified independent predictive factors for DM, as well as for BoM, BrM, LiM and LuM. Above all, a practical and convenient nomogram with a great accuracy to predict DM probability for T1-2N0 EC patients was established. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9888256 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98882562023-02-01 A population-based investigation: How to identify high-risk T1-2N0 esophageal cancer patients? Luo, Peng Wu, Jie Chen, Xiankai Yang, Yafan Zhang, Ruixiang Qi, Xiuzhu Li, Yin Front Surg Surgery PURPOSE: Newly diagnosed T1-2N0 esophageal cancer (EC) is generally deemed as early local disease, with distant metastases (DM) easily overlooked. This retrospective study aimed to describe the metastatic patterns, identify risk factors and established a risk prediction model for DM in T1-2N0 EC patients. METHODS: A total of 4623 T1-2N0 EC patients were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database from 2004 to 2018. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for DM. A nomogram was developed for presentation of the final model. RESULTS: Of 4623 T1-2N0 patients, 4062 (87.9%) had M0 disease and 561 (12.1%) had M1 disease. The most common metastatic site was liver (n = 156, 47.3%), followed by lung (n = 89, 27.0%), bone (n = 70, 21.2%) and brain (n = 15, 4.5%). Variables independently associated with DM included age at diagnosis, gender, tumor grade, primary site, tumor size and T stage. A nomogram based on the variables had a good predictive accuracy (area under the curve: 0.750). Independent risk factors for bone metastases (BoM), brain metastases (BrM), liver metastases (LiM) and lung metastases (LuM) were identified, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We identified independent predictive factors for DM, as well as for BoM, BrM, LiM and LuM. Above all, a practical and convenient nomogram with a great accuracy to predict DM probability for T1-2N0 EC patients was established. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9888256/ /pubmed/36733675 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1003487 Text en © 2023 Luo, Wu, Chen, Yang, Zhang, Qi and Li. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Surgery Luo, Peng Wu, Jie Chen, Xiankai Yang, Yafan Zhang, Ruixiang Qi, Xiuzhu Li, Yin A population-based investigation: How to identify high-risk T1-2N0 esophageal cancer patients? |
title | A population-based investigation: How to identify high-risk T1-2N0 esophageal cancer patients? |
title_full | A population-based investigation: How to identify high-risk T1-2N0 esophageal cancer patients? |
title_fullStr | A population-based investigation: How to identify high-risk T1-2N0 esophageal cancer patients? |
title_full_unstemmed | A population-based investigation: How to identify high-risk T1-2N0 esophageal cancer patients? |
title_short | A population-based investigation: How to identify high-risk T1-2N0 esophageal cancer patients? |
title_sort | population-based investigation: how to identify high-risk t1-2n0 esophageal cancer patients? |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9888256/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36733675 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1003487 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luopeng apopulationbasedinvestigationhowtoidentifyhighriskt12n0esophagealcancerpatients AT wujie apopulationbasedinvestigationhowtoidentifyhighriskt12n0esophagealcancerpatients AT chenxiankai apopulationbasedinvestigationhowtoidentifyhighriskt12n0esophagealcancerpatients AT yangyafan apopulationbasedinvestigationhowtoidentifyhighriskt12n0esophagealcancerpatients AT zhangruixiang apopulationbasedinvestigationhowtoidentifyhighriskt12n0esophagealcancerpatients AT qixiuzhu apopulationbasedinvestigationhowtoidentifyhighriskt12n0esophagealcancerpatients AT liyin apopulationbasedinvestigationhowtoidentifyhighriskt12n0esophagealcancerpatients AT luopeng populationbasedinvestigationhowtoidentifyhighriskt12n0esophagealcancerpatients AT wujie populationbasedinvestigationhowtoidentifyhighriskt12n0esophagealcancerpatients AT chenxiankai populationbasedinvestigationhowtoidentifyhighriskt12n0esophagealcancerpatients AT yangyafan populationbasedinvestigationhowtoidentifyhighriskt12n0esophagealcancerpatients AT zhangruixiang populationbasedinvestigationhowtoidentifyhighriskt12n0esophagealcancerpatients AT qixiuzhu populationbasedinvestigationhowtoidentifyhighriskt12n0esophagealcancerpatients AT liyin populationbasedinvestigationhowtoidentifyhighriskt12n0esophagealcancerpatients |