Cargando…

Occupation and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk among 108 960 workers during the first pandemic wave in Germany

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify the occupational risk for a SARS-CoV-2 infection in a nationwide sample of German workers during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (1 February–31 August 2020). METHODS: We used the data of 108 960 workers who participated in a COVID follow-up su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reuter, Marvin, Rigó, Mariann, Formazin, Maren, Liebers, Falk, Latza, Ute, Castell, Stefanie, Jöckel, Karl-Heinz, Greiser, Karin Halina, Michels, Karin B., Krause, Gérard, Albrecht, Stefan, Öztürk, Ilter, Kuss, Oliver, Berger, Klaus, Lampl, Benedikt MJ, Leitzmann, Michael, Zeeb, Hajo, Starke, Karla Romero, Schipf, Sabine, Meinke-Franze, Claudia, Ahrens, Wolfgang, Seidler, Andreas, Klee, Bianca, Pischon, Tobias, Deckert, Andreas, Schmidt, Börge, Mikolajczyk, Rafael, Karch, André, Bohn, Barbara, Brenner, Hermann, Holleczek, Bernd, Dragano, Nico
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nordic Association of Occupational Safety and Health 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9888438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35670286
http://dx.doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.4037
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify the occupational risk for a SARS-CoV-2 infection in a nationwide sample of German workers during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (1 February–31 August 2020). METHODS: We used the data of 108 960 workers who participated in a COVID follow-up survey of the German National Cohort (NAKO). Occupational characteristics were derived from the German Classification of Occupations 2010 (Klassifikation der Berufe 2010). PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections were assessed from self-reports. Incidence rates (IR) and incidence rate ratios (IRR) were estimated using robust Poisson regression, adjusted for person-time at risk, age, sex, migration background, study center, working hours, and employment relationship. RESULTS: The IR was 3.7 infections per 1000 workers [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.3–4.1]. IR differed by occupational sector, with the highest rates observed in personal (IR 4.8, 95% CI 4.0–5.6) and business administration (IR 3.4, 95% CI 2.8–3.9) services and the lowest rates in occupations related to the production of goods (IR 2.0, 95% CI 1.5–2.6). Infections were more frequent among essential workers compared with workers in non-essential occupations (IRR 1.95, 95% CI 1.59–2.40) and among highly skilled compared with skilled professions (IRR 1.36, 95% CI 1.07–1.72). CONCLUSIONS: The results emphasize higher infection risks in essential occupations and personal-related services, especially in the healthcare sector. Additionally, we found evidence that infections were more common in higher occupational status positions at the beginning of the pandemic.